The Independent, on UK Politics, 13 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Andy Burnham ‘failing families’ as data shows 40% rise in food prices, says SNP

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

We do not republish articles from The Independent. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.

Read the original article on independent.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Independent reports an SNP attack on Andy Burnham over food prices, built on House of Commons Library figures the SNP commissioned. It attributes the political charge to the SNP in the headline and body, says who commissioned the analysis and prints the government's reply. Its one weakness is that it never says when Burnham took office, so a reader cannot tell how much of the six-year rise the SNP is pinning on him actually happened on his watch.

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “as new data shows food prices have risen almost 40% in six years”

    Why this matters
    The Independent sets a six-year figure, "almost 40% in six years", directly beside the SNP's charge that Andy Burnham is "failing families", and gives no date for when his government began.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the near 40% rise in food prices happened under Burnham, and that it is the measure of his record.
    The context
    The Commons Library window runs from September 2020 to September 2026, and the SNP blames the rises on Burnham's "watch". The article never says when he took office, so the reader cannot judge how much of the 39.6% falls in his time and how much came before.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“in the six years from September 2020 to September 2026”
    • Elsewhere in the article“on his watch every major household bill has increased”
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “took office”.

What it gets right

  • “says SNP”

    The headline keeps the attribution, so the charge that Burnham is failing families reads as the SNP's claim and not the outlet's.

  • “Analysis by the House of Commons Library , commissioned by the SNP”

    It tells the reader who produced the figures and who paid for the analysis, so the source of the data is clear.

  • “A UK Government spokesperson said”

    The government's reply is printed and closes the piece, so the SNP's claims do not go unanswered.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Independent

  1. 12 NovHMRC given new powers to snoop on taxpayers6.0
  2. 12 NovDaniel Thomas admits slashing migrant boat in English Channel3.0
  3. 12 NovAndy Burnham is beginning to sound like Keir Starmer with a northern accent0.0
  4. 12 NovUK households urged to prepare for emergencies and ‘attacks’. Here's what to buy3.0
  5. 12 NovFirst Blair, now Cameron… why are two pro-EU leaders against rejoining?0.0

Everything we scored from The Independent