City AM, on UK Politics, 26 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Healey to ‘increase minimum wage by 3.9 per cent’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Chancellor John Healey will reportedly hike the minimum wage by nearly four per cent at the Budget, setting the floor for wages for all over 21-year-olds at £13.20 for the next year. Healey is expected to deliver to low-wage workers on Wednesday, according to The Times . However, the increase will also mark the end of the government’s desire to equalise wages for under 21-year-olds with other adults.

The national living wage could rise from £12.71 to £13.20 while the national minimum wage, which applies to younger workers, will also only rise by 3.9 per cent from £10.85 to £11.27. The policy is popular among voters although business chiefs have long warned that extra staff could add to pressures in the jobs market and force them to raise prices. Increases in the minimum wage by former Chancellor Rachel Reeves were cited as a reason for rising unemployment.

The unemployment rate is at 4.7 per cent, rising from around 4.4 per cent in the last two years. Labour’s manifesto promised to end a “discriminatory” minimum wage for young people. The party said it would bring wages in line with the living wage by 2030. The government takes recommendations by the Low Pay Commission, which is an independent body. It sets the commission a mandate on pay increases. Former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said the quango should be abolished in May.

Healey’s plan to balance risks Business chiefs have said a rapid rise in the minimum wage had deterred bosses from hiring younger people given added costs. The unemployment for those aged between 16 and 24 surpassed 16 per cent for the first time in over a decade. Healey and Andy Burnham have also made solving a crisis among ‘Neets’ , which are young people out of employment, education and training, a top priority. Alan Milburn, whose review on youth joblessness is set to be completed next month, linked a rise in unemployment to additional costs on employers from higher wages in a report over the summer.

Kate Nicholls, the chair of UK Hospitality, said . The Treasury declined to comment on “speculation”.

Read the original article on cityam.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

City AM reports The Times's account of a 3.9 per cent rise in the minimum wage and sources it clearly. In its own voice it calls the rise "huge", yet its own figures say the youth rate will "only" rise by 3.9 per cent, and it calls a reported plan a "decision". It quotes only business voices on young people's pay.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “a huge pay increase of 3.9 per cent”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice City AM calls the 3.9 per cent rise "huge".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the rise to be unusually large.
    The context
    City AM's own figures describe a rise of under 50p an hour, and two sentences later it says the youth rate will "only" rise by the same 3.9 per cent. The article gives no comparison that would make the rise huge.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“will also only rise by 3.9 per cent”
    • Elsewhere in the article“by nearly four per cent”

    Show it in the article

  2. Treats a reported plan as a decision

    Minor

    “as she welcomed the decision”

    Why this matters
    City AM writes of "the decision" to drop equalisation as if it had been taken.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the end of the equalisation plan to be confirmed government policy.
    The context
    The article rests on a Times report. It says the rise will "reportedly" happen, and the Treasury called it speculation.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“declined to comment on “speculation””
    • Elsewhere in the article“Chancellor John Healey will reportedly hike”

    Show it in the article

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “equalisation of wages between younger and older workers “would damage job opportunities at entry level””

    Why this matters
    The only voice City AM quotes on the youth rate is the chair of UK Hospitality. Business chiefs also fill S5 and S13.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears only the case against equalising young people's pay.
    The context
    The story concerns low-paid workers too, yet no union, low-pay campaigner or young worker is quoted. Labour's own reason for equalising, ending a "discriminatory" rate, appears only as a line from the manifesto.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“end a “discriminatory” minimum wage for young people”
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “union”.

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “according to The Times”

    It names the source of the report instead of presenting the figure as confirmed.

  • “The Treasury declined to comment”

    It reports the government's response, which tells the reader the plan is not yet confirmed.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from City AM

Everything we scored from City AM