The Independent, on Climate, 5 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

65% of Labour voters want Government to approve Rosebank oil field – survey

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Become an Independent member to bookmark this article Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today. Join today Already a member? Log in Almost two thirds of Labour supporters want to see UK ministers approve the controversial Rosebank oil and gas field, a survey suggests. found 65% of those who backed Labour in the 2024 general election wanted to see the project – which is the largest undeveloped oil field in UK waters – get the green light.

Despite Labour’s manifesto in 2024 under Sir Keir Starmer pledging that no new oil and gas licences would be granted, less than a fifth (17%) of the party’s voters said that Rosebank – which lies to the north west of Shetland – should be rejected. open image in gallery ,. (Andrew Milligan/PA) With the UK Government , now under Andy Burnham , having already approved the Jackdaw gas field off the coast of Aberdeen, the Opinium research found 68% of Labour supporters agreed this was the right decision.

Almost three quarters (72%) of those who voted for the party in 2024 agreed that oil and gas are “essential for the foreseeable future”. The polling – which questioned 2,050 adults across the UK – found that overall 55% of people were in favour of increasing the country’s domestic oil and gas production, with more than three out of five (63%) saying Rosebank should be given the go-ahead. “offer Government an opportunity to align with public opinion and start working through the pipeline of North Sea projects that are awaiting approval”.

He added: “The public are clearly in agreement with the new Prime Minister’s ‘pragmatic’ policy on the North Sea, which will once again be tested as the final decision on Rosebank is made in the coming months.” Mr Whitehouse went on to say that “investing in North Sea energy strengthens Britain’s economy, supports UK supply chains and industrial communities, and builds our energy resilience”. open image in gallery PA Graphics His comments came after the UK Government introduced its Energy Independence Bill, which includes a commitment to issue no new oil and gas licences to explore new fields in the North Sea.

Rosebank had however previously been granted a licence by the Conservative government – though it was later ruled that this was unlawful leading to the project having to be considered again. Speaking about the new legislation Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh said: “Through this Bill, we will build a clean energy future which people feel in their pockets, households and communities, ensuring support reaches those who need it most.” Conservative shadow energy secretary Andrew Bowie said the new poll showed that “the message from the public could not be louder or clearer – support the extraction of North Sea oil and gas before it’s too late”.

Mr Bowie, the MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, added: “This poll shows that Labour are blatantly ignoring the needs of the public, and even their own voters. “These findings make yesterday’s move by Labour to ban any new exploration for oil and gas in the North Sea even more ludicrous, highlighting how disconnected they are from what people in the real world think. “The reality is Andy Burnham is scared to back oil and gas because he is too weak to stand up against net zero zealots, both inside and outside his party.

“If Labour continue to wage war on oil and gas then it’s inevitable businesses will cut jobs and head for the exit, never to return. “That is why Andy Burnham must stop his reckless playground politics, listen to the public, and finally approve Rosebank to ensure North Sea drilling continues for years to come.”

Read the original article on independent.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Independent reports a poll on Rosebank and Jackdaw but never tells the reader that the body that paid for it, Offshore Energies UK, is the trade association for North Sea oil and gas companies. Its chief executive then gets three paragraphs of advocacy as if he were a neutral reader of public opinion. Opponents of the field appear only in a photo caption, while a Conservative frontbencher closes the piece.

  1. Hides who the source is

    Serious

    “Polling for Offshore Energies UK (OEUK)”

    Why this matters
    The words "Polling for Offshore Energies UK (OEUK)" name the poll's sponsor but say nothing about what the organisation is.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the 65% figure as findings from a neutral research client, with no reason to weigh who commissioned the questions.
    The context
    Offshore Energies UK is the trade association for the UK offshore industry, representing North Sea oil and gas companies, and it runs the Back the North Sea campaign. It has a direct interest in Rosebank being approved. The article never calls it a trade body or says it lobbies for the industry.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “trade”, “lobby” and “association”.

    Show it in the article

    “OEUK chief executive David Whitehouse said the survey results”

    Why this matters
    This passage introduces Mr Whitehouse only by his title at OEUK and has him read the poll for the Government.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears his call to work through the pipeline of North Sea projects as a reading of public opinion, not as the demand of an industry lobby.
    The context
    Mr Whitehouse leads the oil and gas trade body that commissioned the poll. His interpretation of it, and his claims that North Sea investment strengthens the economy, come from the industry asking for approvals. The article does not say so.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“investing in North Sea energy strengthens Britain’s economy”
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “trade”.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Polling commissioned by Offshore Energies UK, the trade body for North Sea oil and gas companies, which is pressing ministers to approve Rosebank, found 65% of 2024 Labour voters backed the project.

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Environmental campaigners are urging ministers to reject drilling at Rosebank”

    Why this matters
    The only mention of opponents of Rosebank sits in a photo caption, with no named voice and no reason given.
    The impression it gives
    A reader meets only the industry case and the Conservative case in quotation, and comes away thinking opposition to the field has no argument worth hearing.
    The context
    The OEUK chief executive gets three paragraphs and Andrew Bowie gets six, closing the article. The campaigners who oppose the field are never quoted and their reasons are never stated.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“This poll shows that Labour are blatantly ignoring”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Independent

  1. 5 NovNew oil and gas drilling in North Sea set to be banned – what we know0.0
  2. 5 NovHow El Nino and summer heatwaves have starved our Christmas trees and led to a shortage 3.0
  3. 5 NovAustralia approves seabed site where a Japanese company will store carbon pollution3.0
  4. 5 NovTurkey’s solar boom shines ahead of a UN climate summit but coal and other fossil fuels loom large0.0
  5. 5 NovBurnham set to close North Sea to new oil and gas drilling0.0

Everything we scored from The Independent