Ynet News (English), on Iran, 8 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

‘They sent missiles, we sent a bill’: Tel Aviv suburb sues Iran for NIS 250 million over wartime damages

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Bat Yam has filed a NIS 250 million lawsuit against Iran over the destruction caused by an Iranian missile strike during Operation Rising Lion, after nine residents were killed, 178 were wounded and 160 buildings were damaged in the city. Twenty-two of those buildings had to be demolished immediately. The case, initiated by Mayor Tzvika Brot, who also served as Likud’s campaign manager in Israel’s recent election, was filed in Jerusalem District Court.

The lawsuit was prepared in Hebrew and translated into Persian by an international legal team led by attorney Nitsana Darshan-Leitner of the Shurat HaDin–Israel Law Center. To move the case forward, the city needed to show that an official Iranian representative had received the lawsuit or at least been given an opportunity to read it. Brot and members of his delegation therefore traveled to Manhattan last week, where, in coordination with Israeli officials, U.S. authorities and security personnel, they sought out a diplomat from Iran’s mission to the United Nations.

The operation, which took four months to prepare, included lookouts stationed near UN headquarters while the team waited in a nearby office tower. During the preparations, the team compiled identification profiles of senior Iranian diplomats in New York, gathered information about their movements and mapped routes they were known to use with the help of local contacts. The group chose to approach the diplomat in a public area rather than on Iranian diplomatic premises, which Brot could not enter.

Lookouts eventually spotted the first secretary of Iran’s UN mission leaving a building, and Brot’s delegation followed him. When the diplomat stopped at a traffic light, Brot approached and introduced himself. The group continued alongside him through Manhattan for several minutes and read the contents of the lawsuit aloud, an effort intended to establish that he had been given notice of the proceedings.

Bat Yam was among the Israeli cities hardest hit during the June 2025 war with Iran. The missile strike left nine people dead and 178 wounded, damaged 160 buildings and forced the immediate demolition of 22. Thousands of residents were displaced, with the municipality arranging alternative housing as part of the recovery effort. Over the past year, Brot assembled the legal team that ultimately filed the case. Iran now has 60 days to respond to the lawsuit.

Bat Yam officials expect Tehran not to participate in the proceedings, which could allow the municipality to seek a default judgment. Even if it wins, however, the central question will be how the city could actually collect the money. Municipal officials are looking at funds connected to the Eilat-Ashkelon Pipeline Company, a joint Israeli-Iranian venture established before Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution, when the two countries still had diplomatic ties.

An international arbitration ruling later ordered Israel to pay Iran about $1.1 billion over its share in the project, but Israel has refused to transfer the money because of restrictions on financial dealings with an enemy state. Bat Yam hopes that if its lawsuit succeeds, part of those funds could ultimately be redirected to compensate the city. Brot received backing for the move from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as well as the Foreign Ministry, National Security Council, Justice Ministry and security officials, according to people involved in the initiative.

Government legal officials had previously opposed attempts to seize money connected to the pipeline dispute, but sources involved in the matter say that objection has since been lifted. ynet also learned that Israel previously used some of the funds in secret to help finance construction of the . The municipality gave the operation to serve the lawsuit the name “Open Account.” “Bat Yam has an open account with Iran, and that is why we called the operation that,” Brot said.

“They sent us missiles, and we sent them a bill. Their representative may have tried to get away from us on the streets of New York, but they will not escape responsibility for what they did to my city.” Darshan-Leitner added: “It is time for the Iranians to pay for their actions. We will continue fighting on behalf of terror victims until we economically bring down the ayatollahs’ regime.”

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Ynet reports Bat Yam's NIS 250 million lawsuit against Iran over a deadly missile strike, and gives the mayor and his lawyer the space and the last word. Iran appears only as a diplomat declining to engage, and the article reports no response sought from Iran's mission. Ynet also calls the wall in the occupied West Bank a 'security barrier' in its own voice.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “The Iranian representative said he was a diplomat and was not permitted to engage with them, then tried to walk away.”

    Why this matters
    Ynet gives Iran this one sentence: a diplomat declining to engage on a street corner.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears the mayor, the lawyer and Israeli officials at length, and Iran only as someone trying to escape.
    The context
    Ynet gives the closing lines to Brot and Darshan-Leitner. The article reports no response sought from Iran's mission or foreign ministry about the lawsuit or the delegation's pursuit of its diplomat.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“they will not escape responsibility for what they did to my city”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “West Bank security barrier”

    Why this matters
    Ynet uses Israel's own name for the wall, 'security barrier', in its own voice, and writes 'West Bank' without saying the territory is occupied.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the structure as a neutral security measure on undisputed ground.
    The context
    The ICJ holds that Israel's occupation of the West Bank is unlawful. The article adopts the Israeli government's description of a structure built in that territory without attribution.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds that Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem is unlawful and the settlements illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “an Iranian missile strike during Operation Rising Lion, after nine residents were killed, 178 were wounded”

    Ynet names who fired and says plainly that residents were killed, with the casualty figures given in full.

  • “in coordination with Israeli officials, U.S. authorities and security personnel”

    Ynet tells the reader the delegation acted with official Israeli and US support rather than presenting it as a private civic act.

  • “An international arbitration ruling later ordered Israel to pay Iran about $1.1 billion over its share in the project, but Israel has refused to transfer the money”

    Ynet reports that Israel owes Iran money under an arbitration ruling and has not paid, which a reader needs to judge the city's plan.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 7 NovBreakthrough ahead? US prepares to expand the blockade on Iran6.0
  2. 7 NovNew US strikes on Iran raise fears of wider war as Tehran issues stark warning3.0
  3. 6 NovUS warns Jerusalem embassy of Iranian plots to target American officials0.0
  4. 6 NovIran-linked ships spotted hovering over subsea internet cables after threats, report says3.0
  5. 6 Nov‘A miracle happened to us’: couple welcomes son after daughter killed by Iranian missile0.0

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)