i24News, on West Bank, 25 October 2026

i24News reports the siege of Hebron and the mass expulsion of residents largely through Palestinian sources, but its own vocabulary softens what Israel is doing: the headline has Palestinians 'evacuate' their own homes, and demolitions appear with no one demolishing them. The article never once calls the West Bank occupied, and it drops the fact i24 itself reported two days earlier, that Israeli forces shot the two Palestinian gunmen dead, leaving a reader unclear who died on Friday. It also omits Netanyahu's stated intent to destroy the neighbourhood and the defence minister's admission that the displaced will not be allowed back.

8.8

Serious

out of 10

What we found

  1. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “Palestinians evacuate”

    What the words do
    The headline puts Palestinians in the active voice as the ones evacuating, using the army's word for an expulsion carried out by armed soldiers.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That residents of Hebron left of their own accord, as a precaution, with no one driving them out.
    What is actually the case
    Israeli forces went house to house and forced families out; other outlets covering the same day write that Israel expelled hundreds of Palestinians and that the defence minister admitted around 2,000 were forcibly displaced.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “Evacuation of neighborhoods and closure of the city's entrances”

    What the words do
    The section heading, written in i24's own voice, describes the emptying of whole neighbourhoods as an 'evacuation' with no actor attached to it.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That neighbourhoods were cleared as an administrative or safety measure, not that an army expelled their inhabitants.
    What is actually the case
    The same sentence records that Israeli army forces began forcing residents out of their homes, and the defence minister later acknowledged forced displacement of around 2,000 people.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Hebron under siege: Israeli forces expel hundreds of Palestinian families from their homes, with thousands more facing displacement.

  2. Drops what it reported before

    Serious

    “which resulted in the killing of two Israeli soldiers and the wounding of others”

    What the words do
    The sentence names the two Palestinian shooters and records only the Israeli dead and wounded, saying nothing about what happened to the two men.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the two named Palestinians are alive and perhaps being hunted, and that the only deaths on Friday were Israeli.
    What is actually the case
    i24News reported two days earlier that both Palestinian gunmen were killed, and Anadolu reports that Israeli forces killed both attackers. This article leaves that out while naming the men.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “reshaping the geographical reality in the West Bank”

    What the words do
    Writes about land, displacement and demographic change in the West Bank without once calling the territory occupied, anywhere in the article.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Hebron sits in territory of undetermined status, where Israel's presence and its power over who may live where are ordinary facts rather than an unlawful occupation.
    What is actually the case
    The International Court of Justice found in July 2024 that Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem is unlawful and its settlements illegal. Other outlets covering this same siege write 'the southern occupied West Bank' as a matter of course.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The measures are taking place in the occupied West Bank, where the International Court of Justice ruled in July 2024 that Israel's occupation is unlawful and its settlements illegal.

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article says there are 'no clear guarantees' about residents returning and that the municipality has had no official notice. It leaves out that Israel's defence minister Israel Katz publicly said the displaced would not be allowed back until what he called 'Hamas infrastructure' in the city was dismantled, and acknowledged that around 2,000 people had been forcibly displaced. Without this, a reader believes the return of the expelled families is merely unclear, rather than barred by a stated government condition.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article reports Netanyahu promising to 'neutralize what he described as the threat' and a 'very big surprise' for the Palestinian Authority, but omits his own words about Hebron: that Israel will destroy the neighbourhood the gunmen came from and that the army will remove its residents, and that he ordered the siege itself. Without this, a reader believes the destruction and expulsions are an unexplained military development rather than something the prime minister ordered and announced.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  6. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “began with the demolition of a house belonging to the Imreish family”

    What the words do
    Reports the destruction of a family home with no one doing the destroying; the demolition simply 'began'.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the house came down without an identifiable actor, rather than that Israeli forces demolished the home of a family in the neighbourhood where the shooting happened.
    What is actually the case
    The article itself says Israel threatened to demolish buildings and facilities in the city, and the demolitions are part of the military operation it describes.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“has threatened to demolish buildings and facilities”

    Show it in the article

    “commercial facilities for storing tiles and building materials were also demolished, along with kiosks along the road leading to the northwestern entrance of the city”

    What the words do
    Puts the destruction of shops and kiosks in the passive voice with the actor removed entirely.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That businesses were flattened by no one in particular, as if by the weather of a crisis.
    What is actually the case
    These demolitions were carried out by the Israeli forces whose bulldozers the article places in the same neighbourhoods, and the article elsewhere records Israel's threat to demolish buildings and facilities.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“reinforced with military vehicles and bulldozers stormed the areas”

    Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Hebron siege: amid fears of Gaza Scenario in the West Bank

The Israeli military actions in the city of Hebron do not appear to be merely a security operation. They follow a shooting carried out on Friday by two Palestinians, Ahmd and Hamouda Al-Jabari, from the Ain Deir Bahha neighborhood, . Israel has imposed a siege on the city, forcing hundreds of families to evacuate their homes, and has threatened to demolish buildings and facilities. This raises Palestinian fears that the operation may become a new model of population pressure and , similar to what happened in Gaza during the war. Meanwhile, there are no clear guarantees regarding the residents’ return to their homes. Rabbis for Human Rights comments on detention of activists in the West Bank At dawn on Saturday, Israeli army forces began forcing residents of neighborhoods in western Hebron, particularly Deir Bahha and Al-Jalda, to leave their homes, coinciding with the continued closure of the city's entrances and the imposition of strict movement restrictions. The Hebron Municipality stated that about 1,500 Palestinians from 250 families have been forced to flee since Friday, warning that around 2,500 more people could be displaced in the coming hours as the scope of the military operation expands. According to Palestinian reports, forces reinforced with military vehicles and bulldozers stormed the areas of Deir Bahha, Al-Jalda roundabout, and Nimra, raiding and searching homes, while marks were placed on buildings whose residents had been evacuated. Hebron Governor Khaled Dudin told Agence France-Presse that about a third of the city was affected by the Israeli measures, describing what is happening as collective punishment of residents who have no connection to the operation. The Israeli army said it is carrying out what it described as precise and targeted searches, which will continue for several days, without providing details about the final geographic scope of the operation or the fate of the residents who were forced to leave. In statements to i24NEWS, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that he would work to neutralize what he described as the threat, adding that a "very big surprise" awaits the Palestinian Authority, in remarks that raised questions about the nature of Israel's upcoming actions in the West Bank. According to statements by Palestinian activists, the army distributed maps to residents listing around 150 buildings and homes. It informed them of the need to gather their belongings and evacuate the area. They indicated that the forces opened corridors for residents to leave, amid reports that some residents were beaten and arrested during the evacuation and raid operations. Suggested articles Deadly shooting prompts West Bank closures days before Israeli election | i24NEWS Harvesting olives or headlines? Lander’s detention fuels West Bank dispute | Danna Avni Ten arrested in West Bank raids after attacks on journalist and foreign diplomats | i24NEWS In parallel, the Palestinian Prisoners Club documented around 70 arrests across various governorates of the West Bank from Friday until early Saturday morning. Some of the detainees were released, while arrests and field interrogations continue. The Palestinian government warned of the escalation of Israeli operations in the West Bank, describing them as an assault targeting the Palestinians, their land, and their resources. It held the Israeli government responsible for the consequences of the escalation, and called on the international community to intervene to stop the operations in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Fears of a repeat of the Gaza scenario In Hebron, concerns are not limited to the expansion of the military operation, but also extend to the possibility that the evacuation could turn into a prolonged displacement, in the absence of a clear timetable for the residents' return. According to municipal council member Khaled Al-Natsheh, Hebron has started preparing facilities to receive displaced families, including the Childhood Happiness Complex, which has a theater and a garden. However, it is still not equipped to accommodate the expected numbers, which has prompted the municipality to look for alternative locations in cooperation with local institutions and families who have opened their guest rooms to receive the displaced. Al-Natsheh added that the municipality has not received an official notice specifying the duration of the operation, but testimonies from families forced to leave indicated that soldiers mentioned it would last ten to fifteen days, while residents quoted other soldiers as saying that returning would not be possible in the near future. The councilmember also pointed out that attempts by the Palestinian liaison to obtain information regarding the scope and duration of the siege did not yield clear answers, noting that, according to local testimonies, the military movements have exceeded the areas specified in the maps published by the army. With the city’s entrances closed, the municipality declared a state of emergency and began preparing for the possibility of continued and expanded displacement. Its efforts include searching for shelter centers, communicating with the International Committee of the Red Cross regarding the possibility of transferring patients from besieged areas, and working to deliver food to families who remain inside. Suggested articles US officials condemn settler attacks in the West Bank that injured an unarmed American journalist | i24NEWS 'This could kill somebody,' Fleur Hassan-Nahoum tells i24NEWS after Palestinian stone-throwing attack | i24NEWS Israel’s warnings of a PA attack shifts focus from the unresolved Hamas threat - analysis | Ariel Oseran Residents facing open displacement According to Palestinian reports, the Israeli measures in Hebron in the Farsh al-Hawa area, which had witnessed the shooting incident. Later, . Adnan Al-Tamimi, one of the residents who was forced to leave, said that Israeli forces stormed his family’s home after midnight on Friday and forced about 20 people living in a three-story building to evacuate it, before turning it into a military post and raising Israeli flags over it. As for Samir Skaafi, who lives in the same area, he said that evictions have started in the western neighborhoods of Ain Deir Bahha, while his family is still waiting to find out whether their home will be included in the decision. He explained that residents who initially refused to leave found themselves facing successive raids on their homes, which eventually ended with the owners being forced out. These statements, according to the concerns of residents and the municipality, reflect a crisis that goes beyond immediate evacuation to the issue of return, especially if the process is accompanied by the demolition of buildings, their conversion into military sites, or the imposition of prolonged restrictions on access to the affected neighborhoods. Security and political calculations that go beyond the operation Observers believe that the developments in Hebron may have implications that go beyond the military response to the shooting incident, in light of escalating Israeli policies in the West Bank and the internal debate regarding the government's ability to provide security, with the approach of the Israeli elections scheduled for October 27. In an analysis of the potential objectives, analysts believe that the Israeli moves can be understood within overlapping paths, starting with expanding control over land and not ending with causing demographic and geographic changes through internal displacement and pressure on the population. This overlap between security and political considerations raises questions about whether the measures in Hebron will remain limited in time and geography, or if they will turn into a broader approach that includes other areas of the West Bank, especially in light of Israeli statements mentioning additional steps that have not yet been disclosed. In light of the ongoing siege and the lack of clear information regarding when the operation will end, the key questions remain tied to the fate of the families who were forced to flee, the possibility of their return to their homes, and the extent of destruction that the area might witness. These questions put Hebron to a test that goes beyond the immediate results of the military operation, encompassing its demographic, geographic, and political repercussions on the future of the West Bank.

Read the original article on i24news.tv (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from i24News

Everything we scored from i24News