The Spectator opinion piece, on UK Politics, 27 October 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

The problem with this Paddington bear Budget

No framing issues found.

It risks turning Wednesday’s big speech into the Paddington bear Budget. The left of the Labour party, high on promises of ending 40 years of neo-liberalism, might have been hoping for a wealth tax, an exit charge, plus sweeping renationalisation of the utilities, but instead it looks like they will get something far more modest in tomorrow’s first financial statement from the new Chancellor John Healey: cheaper marmalade. Sure, that might be great if you happen to be a small bear from darkest Peru.

But it won’t do anything to turn around the British economy. Even the Treasury’s own calculations suggest that the changes will only save the average household £21 a year From all the advanced leaks, it seems like Healey is planning a dull, do-no-harm Budget. Still, he has to say something to fill up an hour or so in the House of Commons. To help set a positive mood, the government has just released a plan to lift the tariffs left over from our membership of the EU on a whole range of things, including boiled sweets, toffees, and, yes, marmalade.

As it happens, there is nothing wrong with the idea itself, even if tariffs are usually a matter for the department for trade instead of the Chancellor. It is ridiculous that more than five years after we left the EU we still impose tariffs on items such as garlic, gherkins and chocolate-coated wafers and waffles. It is hard to understand why the trade officials in Brussels think it is so important to protect the domestic boiled sweets industry.

After all, even Donald Trump, who keeps telling everyone ‘tariff’ is his favourite word, doesn’t go that far. But it makes even less sense for a relatively small, open economy such as Britain. They should have been lifted years ago. Most popular Ameer Kotecha When are we going to drop the whole reparations farce? Gareth Roberts It’s time to de-decolonise Britain Stephen Daisley What Andy Burnham can’t admit about migration Still, better late than never.

Of course, it will make the task of rejoining the Customs Union, or indeed the EU itself, a lot harder, since it will mean the tariffs will have to be re-imposed again. The bigger problem, however, is this. It won’t make any real difference to anything. Even the Treasury’s own calculations suggest that the changes will only save the average household £21 a year. The economy needs major, bold reforms if it is to start growing fast enough to create jobs, raise living standards, and finance the juggernaut of government spending.

It needs planning reform, dramatically cheaper energy, simplified taxes that don’t destroy incentives, and a determined effort to bring welfare spending under control and get people back to work. Cheaper marmalade, or even boiled sweets, won’t make any difference to any of those issues – it is just a distraction from a government that is too timid to make any serious reforms.

Read the original article on spectator.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

Matthew Lynn's Spectator column argues that lifting leftover EU tariffs on marmalade and sweets is a sensible but trivial measure, and that Healey's first Budget looks too timid to fix the economy. It is an argument about policy. It names no community, smears no one, and attributes its one figure to the Treasury, so nothing in it misleads the reader.

Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.

What it gets right

  • “Even the Treasury’s own calculations suggest that the changes will only save the average household £21 a year.”

    The column gives its one figure a source, the Treasury, and a base, the average household per year. It does not present the number as its own estimate.

  • “there is nothing wrong with the idea itself”

    The column concedes the merit of the policy it is mocking, so the reader can tell its criticism of the measure's scale apart from the measure itself.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Spectator

  1. 27 OctBritain must decide what its armed forces are for0.0
  2. 27 OctIt’s time to de-decolonise Britain0.0
  3. 27 OctDo MPs still care about the Commons?0.0
  4. 26 OctFour-day weeks won’t solve the teaching crisis in schools0.0
  5. 26 OctThe BBC can no longer ignore its anti-Semitism problem0.0

Everything we scored from The Spectator