Al-Monitor, on UK Politics, 31 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

UK police arrest Palestine Action supporters ahead of Supreme Court hearing

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

British police on Saturday arrested at least 139 Palestine Action supporters, who protested in London and Edinburgh days ahead of a court appeal over the government's contentious ban of the group. London's Metropolitan Police began detaining people shortly after hundreds started a lunchtime "mass action" outside the US Embassy, an AFP reporter witnessed. The force said in an evening update that officers were "continuing to make arrests" as they confirmed that 139 had already been detained.

Police have arrested more than 4,000 people on suspicion of showing support for Palestine Action, according to campaigners, after the British government outlawed it under anti-terror laws in July 2025. Many of those arrested, including senior citizens and Holocaust survivors, have displayed signs at rallies reading: "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action." In July, hearings related to more than 2,000 of those cases were postponed until later this year.

"It is truly dystopian that there have now been over 4,000 arrests under terror laws for peaceful vigils," Protest organisers Defend Our Juries said in a statement. The ban puts the group on a blacklist that also includes Palestinian militants Hamas and the Lebanese Iran-backed armed group Hezbollah. It made membership of, or support for, Palestine Action a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The group's co-founder Huda Ammori has legally challenged the ban, arguing it was "disproportionate" and infringed human rights.

The Supreme Court is set to hold a two-day hearing on the high-profile case from Wednesday, after the Court of Appeal in June ruled in the government's favour. - 'Losing faith' - Saturday's London protesters held banners bearing slogans such as "How is trying to stop a genocide a crime?" and "We are protesters, not terrorists." Attendee Angie Zelter, 75, told AFP she had already been charged at least eight times at previous rallies but wanted to protest again ahead of the Supreme Court hearing.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says the Court of Appeal ruled in the government's favour in June but never says the High Court had first ruled for Palestine Action and overruled the home secretary's decision. Without it a reader may think the courts have backed the ban at every stage.

How we know

"I am hoping they will come to their senses and agree PA (Palestine Action) should not have been proscribed," she said. Marji Mansfield, 70, a retired financial adviser, said she had previously been arrested about 10 times. "I am losing faith in the judicial system," she told AFP. "If they lift the ban, it would be a way out for the government," Mansfield added, while noting there was currently "no sign" of the ban's reversal. A bestselling Irish author, Sally Rooney, has entered the controversy, with her publisher Faber revealing this month it can no longer sell her books in the UK because of her support for the group.

Set up in 2020, Palestine Action's stated goal on its website -- blocked to UK internet users -- is to end "global participation in Israel's genocidal and apartheid regime". It gained visibility after Israel began bombarding Gaza following the October 7, 2023, attack by fighters from Palestinian group Hamas in southern Israel. Palestine Action has mainly targeted weapons factories in Britain, especially those belonging to the Israel-based defence group Elbit. ctx-jj/rlp

Read the original article on al-monitor.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

AFP, carried by Al-Monitor, reports the arrest of at least 139 Palestine Action supporters in London and Edinburgh days before the Supreme Court hears the challenge to the group's ban. It attributes its figures, quotes the protesters and their organisers at length, and calls the ban contentious. Its one gap is minor: it gives only the Court of Appeal ruling for the government and never says the High Court first ruled against the home secretary.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says the Court of Appeal ruled in the government's favour in June but never says the High Court had first ruled for Palestine Action and overruled the home secretary's decision. Without it a reader may think the courts have backed the ban at every stage.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “according to campaigners”

    It attributes the figure of more than 4,000 arrests to the campaigners who counted them rather than stating it in its own voice.

  • “including senior citizens and Holocaust survivors”

    It tells the reader who is being arrested and quotes the exact sign that leads to arrest, so the reader can see what conduct the terror law is being used against.

  • “the government's contentious ban of the group”

    It reports the ban as disputed rather than settled, matching the live legal challenge it goes on to describe.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al-Monitor

Everything we scored from Al-Monitor