Truthout, on Iran, 3 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

US Continues Strikes on Iran Despite Trump Claims That War Is Over

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Did you know that Truthout is a nonprofit and independently funded by readers like you? If you value what we do, please support our work with a donation . On Monday night, the United States conducted a series of strikes on Iran’s Qeshm Island, the latest in a number of strikes over the past several weeks that have previously gone unreported. Qeshm Island reportedly houses a large underground missile site and a naval base. It also has a desalination plant, which may be considered a civilian target rather than a military one.

Speaking to reporters on Monday, Trump dismissed the idea that other previously unreported strikes have been taking place. “We had a war with Iran. We won,” the president claimed during a speech at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, adding that the U.S. hasn’t engaged in “any fighting for months.” However, other officials speaking to The Wall Street Journal said that the U.S. has been launching smaller-scale strikes for several weeks , with one source telling the publication that the administration has been downplaying the attacks to avoid signaling any intention of resuming major combat operations.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never gives the US officials' stated reason for the strikes: one official described them as limited defensive strikes against Iranian attacks in the Strait of Hormuz, as the US military escorts commercial ships. Without the stated rationale, attributed as the officials' claim, the reader has no idea what Washington says the strikes were for.

How we know

Related Story Op-Ed | War & Peace As US and Israel Plot Iran Escalation, Regional Powers Scramble to Avert It Saudi, Pakistani, and Turkish leaders met with Iranian officials in Tehran, signaling their reticence to renew the war. By Mitchell Plitnick , M ondoweiss October 31, 2026 Truthout Trump has been inconsistent in his remarks regarding the future of the U.S.’s war on Iran. During his speech on Monday, he told reporters that a peace deal with the country “looks like [it’s] coming together very nicely.”

That comment came shortly after Trump stated on Truth Social that a deal “could happen,” and that Iran wanted a resolution to the conflict “as soon as possible.” But for several weeks, the president has been suggesting that major hostilities could resume shortly after the midterm elections, . Less than a day after his speech at the Reflecting Pool in which he said a deal was close, Trump indicated in an appearance on “Fox & Friends” that he may restart major attacks on Iran.

Asked by the Fox News hosts what “the next thing” in the war would be, Trump suggested that he could order the resumption of major combat operations. “I’m not looking to kill lots of people, but if we have to, we’ll have to,” Trump said . Notably, Trump spent most of the interview — including falsely claiming that “inflation is solved” and that “everything is going good” regarding the economy . In response to The Wall Street Journal report, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) expressed alarm at the revelation that the U.S. has been launching strikes without publicly announcing them.

“After eight months of an illegal war, there was finally some hope that a diplomatic agreement might be within reach and this war could end through negotiations rather than spiral into the violent scenarios being threatened after the midterm elections,” NIAC President Jamal Abdi said in a statement . “But these deeply alarming revelations suggest we may be heading in precisely the opposite direction.” Abdi added: Every day that Congress fails to intervene is another day this administration is allowed to wage an unauthorized war, conceal its military operations, and gamble with millions of lives.

Congress must immediately demand answers, oppose further military action, and use its power to cut off funding for this unauthorized war. Before you go — an appeal for your support Truthout is one of only a few platforms for justice-oriented, grassroots journalism. As Trump attempts to silence dissenting voices, we have no choice but to ask for your help. We are fundraising today to fund our basic operating expenses. If you can support Truthout with a one-time or monthly donation, you will make a significant impact on our work.

Anything you can do makes a difference — we appreciate your support. Share Share via Facebook Facebook Circle Icon Share via Bluesky Bluesky Circle Icon Share via Flipboard Flipboard Circle Icon Share via Mail Mail Circle Icon Share via Print More Share via Threads Share via Reddit Reddit Cirlce Icon Share via Pocket Pocket Circle Icon Share via Linkedin LinkedIn Circle Icon Share via Twitter Twitter Circle Icon Republish Republish This Article for Free Republishing Guidelines This article is licensed under Creative Commons ( CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 ), and you are free to share and republish under the following terms: Required: Required: You must credit Truthout and retain our links, as follows: "This article was originally published by Truthout."

Required: You must preserve the article exactly as it appears on our site. You cannot edit, shorten or otherwise alter the content. Required: You must clearly credit the author(s) and retain their byline. Prohibited: You cannot republish our photographs or illustrations without specific permission. Prohibited: You cannot use this work for commercial purposes. Article HTML Republish HTML code for copying <h1>US Continues Strikes on Iran Despite Trump Claims That War Is Over</h1> <p><strong>By Chris Walker</strong></p> <p><em>This article was originally published by </em> <a href src="https://truthout.org/articles/us-continues-strikes-on-iran-despite-trump-claims-that-war-is-over/">Truthout</a></p> <p><strong><p>The White House has not reported on the US’s strikes on Iran over the past several weeks.</p></strong></p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">On Monday night, the United States conducted a series of strikes on Iran’s Qeshm Island, the latest in a number of strikes over the past several weeks that have previously gone unreported.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/u-s-strikes-irans-qeshm-island-as-trump-talks-down-war-risks-79d73d3d">Qeshm Island reportedly houses a large underground missile site</a> and a naval base.

It also has a desalination plant, which may be considered a civilian target rather than a military one. </p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Speaking to reporters on Monday, Trump dismissed the idea that other previously unreported strikes have been taking place.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We had a war with Iran. We won,” <a href="https://www.newsweek.com/us-strikes-iran-as-trump-says-we-havent-been-fighting-for-months-12653200">the president claimed</a> during a speech at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, adding that the U.S. hasn’t engaged in “any fighting for months.” </p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, <a href="https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/u-s-strikes-irans-qeshm-island-as-trump-talks-down-war-risks-79d73d3d">other officials speaking to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> said that the U.S. has been launching smaller-scale strikes for several weeks</a>, with one source telling the publication that the administration has been downplaying the attacks to avoid signaling any intention of resuming major combat operations. </p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Trump has been inconsistent in his remarks regarding the future of the U.S.’s war on Iran.

During his speech on Monday, <a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/11/2/iran-pushing-accelerated-plan-for-ceasefire-talks-with-us">he told reporters that a peace deal with the country “looks like [it’s] coming together very nicely.”</a> That comment came shortly after Trump stated on Truth Social that a deal “could happen,” and that Iran wanted a resolution to the conflict “as soon as possible.”</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">But for several weeks, the president has been suggesting that major hostilities could resume shortly after the midterm elections, <a href="https://truthout.org/articles/trumps-genocidal-rhetoric-on-iran-deserves-legal-consequences-scholars-say/">sometimes using explicitly genocidal terms</a>.

Less than a day after his speech at the Reflecting Pool in which he said a deal was close, Trump indicated in an appearance on “Fox & Friends” that he may restart major attacks on Iran.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Asked by the <em>Fox News</em> hosts what “the next thing” in the war would be, Trump nonchalantly suggested that he could order the resumption of major combat operations.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I’m not looking to kill lots of people, but if we have to, we’ll have to,” <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/trump-rambles-killing-lots-people-134115400.html">Trump said</a>.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Notably, Trump spent most of the interview peddling blatant falsehoods — including falsely <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/trump-rambles-killing-lots-people-134115400.html">claiming that “inflation is solved” and that “everything is going good” regarding the economy</a>.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">In response to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> report, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) expressed alarm at the revelation that the U.S. has been launching strikes without publicly announcing them.</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">“After eight months of an illegal war, there was finally some hope that a diplomatic agreement might be within reach and this war could end through negotiations rather than spiral into the violent scenarios being threatened after the midterm elections,” <a href="https://x.com/NIACouncil/status/2117439321514897579">NIAC President Jamal Abdi said in a statement</a>.

“But these deeply alarming revelations suggest we may be heading in precisely the opposite direction.”</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Abdi added:</p> <blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every day that Congress fails to intervene is another day this administration is allowed to wage an unauthorized war, conceal its military operations, and gamble with millions of lives.

Congress must immediately demand answers, oppose further military action, and use its power to cut off funding for this unauthorized war.</p> </blockquote> <hr> <p><em>This <a href="https://truthout.org/articles/us-continues-strikes-on-iran-despite-trump-claims-that-war-is-over/">article</a> was originally published by <a href="https://truthout.org">Truthout</a> and is licensed under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" rel="license">Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)</a>.

Please maintain all links and credits in accordance with our <a href="https://truthout.org/republishing-policy">republishing guidelines</a>.</em></p> Copy this HTML code to republish the article on your website Close Copy HTML This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) , and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license. Chris Walker Chris Walker is a news writer at Truthout , based in Madison, Wisconsin.

Focusing on both national and local topics since the early 2000s, he has produced thousands of articles analyzing the issues of the day and their impact on people. He can be found on most social media platforms under the handle @thatchriswalker . Truthout

Read the original article on truthout.org (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Truthout reports that the US struck Iran's Qeshm Island and had been carrying out unannounced strikes for weeks, naming the US as the actor and attributing the Wall Street Journal's sourcing clearly. In its own voice it adds a few unsupported verdicts on Trump, such as 'explicitly genocidal terms', 'blatant falsehoods' and 'nonchalantly'. It also leaves out the US officials' stated reason for the strikes, which other outlets reported.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “sometimes using explicitly genocidal terms”

    Why this matters
    Truthout states in its own voice that Trump has used "explicitly genocidal terms", without quoting the terms or naming who reached that judgement.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established fact, not as an assessment, that the president has spoken in explicitly genocidal language about Iran.
    The context
    The article quotes no such terms. The nearest quote, "I'm not looking to kill lots of people", is a threat of mass killing but not what the sentence describes. The characterisation needed a quoted example or an attribution to whoever made it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“I’m not looking to kill lots of people, but if we have to, we’ll have to”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “peddling blatant falsehoods”

    Why this matters
    Truthout calls Trump's remarks "blatant falsehoods" that he was "peddling", in its own narration.
    The impression it gives
    The reader is told the economic claims are plainly false as a matter the article has shown.
    The context
    The article gives no figure or source in its text showing that the inflation claim is false. It passes a verdict with no supporting fact on the page.

    Show it in the article

    “nonchalantly”

    Why this matters
    The word "nonchalantly" describes Trump's manner when he talked about resuming major combat.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes Trump's tone as established, separate from what he actually said.
    The context
    The article quotes his words but gives nothing about his manner that supports the adverb. It is the reporter's characterisation.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“if we have to, we’ll have to”

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never gives the US officials' stated reason for the strikes: one official described them as limited defensive strikes against Iranian attacks in the Strait of Hormuz, as the US military escorts commercial ships. Without the stated rationale, attributed as the officials' claim, the reader has no idea what Washington says the strikes were for.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “the United States conducted a series of strikes on Iran’s Qeshm Island”

    Truthout names the actor in the active voice and does not hide who carried out the strikes.

  • “other officials speaking to The Wall Street Journal said that the U.S. has been launching smaller-scale strikes for several weeks”

    It attributes the claim about unannounced strikes to its source rather than stating it bare.

  • “the president claimed”

    Trump's statement that the war is over is reported as his claim, not as fact, and is then set against the officials' account.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Truthout

  1. 31 OctAs US and Israel Plot Iran Escalation, Regional Powers Scramble to Avert It6.0
  2. 29 OctSenator Briefed on Trump’s Iran War Plans Warns of “Devastating Escalation”3.0
  3. 28 OctCost of Iran War Jumps to $47 Billion — a Figure Believed to Be an Underestimate0.0
  4. 22 OctReports: US and Israel Set to Restart Major Operations in Iran After Midterms0.0
  5. 20 OctSenate Democrats Demand Trump Administration Reveal Full Costs of Iran War3.0

Everything we scored from Truthout