The Telegraph, on Climate, 4 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Andy Burnham to

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Andy Burnham is poised to ban drilling for new oil and gas in the UK to end exploration in the North Sea. The Prime Minister has backed an energy bill that would put into law a permanent prohibition on new drilling, a move to make it harder for ministers to reverse the ban in future. Energy exploration in the UK is subject to the temporary moratorium originally imposed by Ed Miliband, the former energy secretary, but this could be lifted by a future energy secretary.

Mr Burnham is now supporting new laws being introduced by Mr Miliband’s successor, Miatta Fahnbulleh, that would make it harder to reopen the North Sea. Repealing the proposed new law would need a parliamentary majority. The Government said the energy independence bill would deliver on its “pragmatic approach to the North Sea, by ending new licences to explore new oil and gas fields while supporting continued production from existing licensed areas”.

If approved by Parliament, the new laws would allow oil companies to keep operating existing licensed oil and gas fields until they are depleted. But they would be able to drill new wells only if they could be connected to existing infrastructure by subsea pipelines known as tiebacks. The move follows the approval last month of the Jackdaw gas field, which operates under an existing licence and uses a tieback to pump gas into established pipelines.

Labour is yet to make a decision on the giant Rosebank oil field , west of Shetland, which also has an existing licence. Both the Conservatives and Reform UK have pledged to restart North Sea exploration and drilling were they to win power. Andrew Bowie, the shadow energy secretary, criticised Mr Burnham’s plans warning: “Labour’s so-called energy independence bill will only make Britain more dependent on oil and gas imports. Labour might as well hang a ‘closed for business’ sign over our North Sea.”

The legislation honours Labour’s 2024 manifesto pledge, which stated: “We will not issue new licences to explore new fields because they will not take a penny off bills, cannot make us energy secure and will only accelerate the worsening climate crisis. In addition, we will not grant new coal licences and will ban fracking for good.” David Bucknall, the head of subsidiary Ineos Energy, which has a raft of North Sea assets, said: “The Government’s legislation to ban new drilling in the North Sea would actively decrease energy security in the UK.

“Leaving existing resources in the ground at home while we import the same resources from abroad makes our energy autonomy a victim of global instability.” Analyst Ashley Kelty, from Panmure Liberum, said: “This bill just highlights the lunacy of net zero dogma. “It’s risible that they try to say that it’s pragmatic to stop the UK producing more oil and gas. It’s clearly a reaction to poor polling against the Greens. I see this as more vibe driven policy making as opposed to ‘pragmatic’ policy making.”

Dan Slater, from Zeus Capital, said: “While banning new exploration licences via legislation makes resumption a more circuitous process, the logic for new licences is inescapable, and parliament is sovereign and fully has the power to reverse the new ban.” David Whitehouse, the chief executive of Offshore Energies UK, a trade body for Britain’s oil and gas producers, said the planned bill would simply make the UK more dependent on imported oil and gas.

“ We should be making the most of the energy we produce here at home rather than relying on imports.”

Read the original article on telegraph.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Telegraph's headline says new North Sea drilling will become illegal, but its own body says the bill ends new exploration licences and still allows new wells tied back to existing infrastructure. The article ends with a run of opponents and lets the oil and gas trade body's claim that the ban leaves households exposed close the piece. The only counter-argument is a Labour manifesto quote much earlier.

NewsCord staff selected this article for review and pointed the model at passages to examine. Every finding quotes the article.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “make new North Sea drilling illegal”

    Why this matters
    The headline says all new drilling in the North Sea will be made illegal.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes no new wells of any kind could be drilled in the North Sea under the bill.
    The context
    The body says the bill ends new licences to explore new fields. It says existing fields keep operating and companies can still drill new wells connected to existing infrastructure by tiebacks. The Independent describes the bill as making new exploration illegal, not all new drilling.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Minor

    “This will leave households and businesses exposed in an increasingly volatile world.”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph closes the article with Offshore Energies UK's claim that the ban leaves households and businesses exposed, followed only by its call to produce more at home.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away believing that ending new exploration will leave households less secure, and that this is where the argument rests.
    The context
    The article itself shows this claim is contested. Labour's manifesto, quoted earlier, says new licences will not take a penny off bills and cannot make the UK energy secure. Nothing is set against the trade body's claim at the end, after a run of five opposing voices.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“cannot make us energy secure”
    • Elsewhere in the article“will not take a penny off bills”

    Show it in the article

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Some energy insiders and investors disagree, including Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s Ineos group.”

    Why this matters
    This sentence opens a block of quotes from Ineos, two City analysts and the oil and gas trade body, all against the bill, after the shadow energy secretary has already attacked it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes informed opinion on the bill runs almost entirely against it.
    The context
    The only voices for the bill are a Government statement and a manifesto quote. The article quotes no independent analyst, economist or energy expert who supports ending new exploration.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“This bill just highlights the lunacy of net zero dogma”
    • Elsewhere in the article“will only make Britain more dependent on oil and gas imports”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Telegraph

  1. 5 NovLabour MPs accuse Andy Burnham of hypocrisy over North Sea drilling ban3.0
  2. 4 NovDropping milk to go vegan is bad for you, study warns3.0
  3. 3 NovKellogg’s removes rice from Rice Krispies6.0
  4. 3 NovAndy Burnham to halt wind and solar subsidies in net zero climbdown6.0
  5. 3 NovBritain set for Christmas tree shortage after heatwaves6.0

Everything we scored from The Telegraph