Daily Express, on UK Politics, 26 October 2026

The Daily Express tells readers that Andy Burnham's spokeswoman "refused to say whether he even backed Brexit", when the quotation it prints a few lines later shows she was describing the future relationship with Europe. It then states in its own voice that the episode will fuel fears among 17.4 million Leave voters that the Prime Minister is "preparing the ground" to return to Brussels, and that there was a "furious backlash from Leavers", with no poll and only Nigel Farage named. Words like "humiliating", "fiasco" and "desperately" are the paper's own verdict on an on-the-record No 10 statement.

7.3

Serious

out of 10

What we found

  1. Makes a false claim

    Serious

    “his own spokeswoman refused to say whether he even backed Brexit , saying he was "crucially not leaning either way"”

    What the words do
    Recasts the spokeswoman's quoted words as a refusal to say whether the Prime Minister supports Brexit.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That No 10 would not confirm the Prime Minister backs Brexit at all.
    What is actually the case
    The quotation the article itself prints shows she was describing the long-term relationship with Europe, saying he is "crucially not leaning either way, and that will be for the British public to decide". Nothing in the article shows she was asked whether he backed Brexit.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“it's time for us to discuss what kind of long-term relationship with Europe is best for Britain”
    • Elsewhere in the article“that will be for the British public to decide”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Asked about the Prime Minister's position, his spokeswoman said he was "crucially not leaning either way" on what kind of long-term relationship with Europe Britain should have, and that the choice would be for the public.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “will fuel fears among the 17.4million who voted Leave that the Prime Minister is preparing the ground to drag Britain back towards Brussels”

    What the words do
    States as the paper's own fact that 2016 Leave voters fear a hidden plan, and describes the Prime Minister as "preparing the ground" to "drag" the country back.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That 17.4 million people share this fear and that the Prime Minister is secretly working towards rejoining.
    What is actually the case
    The article gives no poll or survey of Leave voters; the only person quoted making this charge is the Reform UK leader. The article's own account has Burnham vowing to "never move ahead of the British public when it comes to Brexit" and ruling out free movement without a referendum.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“never move ahead of the British public when it comes to Brexit”
    • Elsewhere in the article“branded it a "betrayal"”

    Show it in the article

    “after furious backlash from Leavers on freedom of movement”

    What the words do
    Presents a "furious backlash from Leavers" as an established event in the paper's own voice.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Leave voters as a body reacted with fury and that this is what forced the clarification.
    What is actually the case
    The only named critic in the article is Nigel Farage; no other Leave voter, group or poll appears anywhere in the piece.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Mr Farage branded his comments a "total betrayal of Brexit"”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, said the Prime Minister's comments were a "total betrayal of Brexit". Downing Street said no option was being proposed and that any decision would be for the public.

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “just days after calling for an "honest discussion" about bringing it back”

    What the words do
    Writes in the Express's own voice that Burnham called for a discussion "about bringing it back", turning a call for debate into a proposal to restore free movement.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the Prime Minister asked for a discussion about reinstating EU free movement, and that officials were contradicting him.
    What is actually the case
    The spokeswoman's words printed in the same article say he "isn't proposing a return to freedom of movement, or any option", and the coverage of his original remarks records him saying free movement had "very significant challenges associated with it".

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “a humiliating Brexit climbdown after Andy Burnham's free movement fiasco”

    What the words do
    Puts "humiliating" and "fiasco" in the paper's own voice to describe a spokeswoman's clarification.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That a clear disaster has occurred inside Downing Street.
    What is actually the case
    The facts the article reports are a statement setting out what the Prime Minister is and is not proposing; the words carry a verdict those facts do not.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“A No 10 spokeswoman said”

    Show it in the article

    “his own spin-doctors were desperately rowing back”

    What the words do
    Calls the Prime Minister's press officers "spin-doctors" acting "desperately" in the paper's own voice.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That No 10 staff were panicking and manipulating the story.
    What is actually the case
    The article's only basis is the on-the-record statement quoted immediately afterwards, which sets out a position rather than retracting one.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“He is saying that it's time for us to discuss”

    Show it in the article

  5. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “'betrayal!'”

    What the words do
    Puts the attack word in quotation marks at the end of the headline with no speaker and an exclamation mark nobody used.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That "betrayal" is the agreed description of what happened, rather than one party leader's attack line.
    What is actually the case
    In the body the word belongs to Nigel Farage of Reform UK alone, who "branded it a 'betrayal'" of Leave voters.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“including Reform UK's Nigel Farage , who branded it a "betrayal"”

    Show it in the article

  6. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never reports that in the remarks at issue Burnham said free movement had "very significant challenges associated with it" and was discussing how migration had changed since Brexit. Without that, a reader believes he was arguing for free movement's return, which is the premise of the paper's "climbdown".

    Show where it belongs

  7. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article does not say what the 20 November Brussels summit is expected to cover. Other coverage of the same story reports deals on food and drink, youth mobility and emissions trading, not free movement or membership, so a reader is left believing the summit is a step towards rejoining.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Andy Burnham U-turn as PM ties himself in knots on Brexit –

Andy Burnham U-turn as PM ties himself in knots on Brexit – 'betrayal!' Downing Street forced into frantic climbdown Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments By Aaron Newbury , Political Correspondent 12:59, Mon, Oct 26, 2026 Updated: 13:13, Mon, Oct 26, 2026 Andy Burnham's spokeswoman was forced to clarify what he had said (Image: Getty) Downing Street has been forced into left his own officials unable to say what he even wants. Desperate officials had to insist the Prime Minister was not proposing a return to EU freedom of movement, . In an astonishing admission, . It comes after a challenging few days for Mr Burnham , after he appeared to tie himself in knots over his evolving position on Britain's future outside the EU. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT Nigel Farage's 65-point plan to save the economy in full – number 21 is pure gold dust Andy Burnham doubles down on Brexit betrayal in explosive GMB comments Get the latest politics news - straight from our team in Westminster and more I would like to receive emails from the Daily Express featuring our latest products, services, offers, and promotions from across the Reach Plc family . Subscribe Invalid email You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info . Just days ago, the new premier told The Sunday Times he wanted a "very factual, quite evidence-based debate" on free movement. His declaration sparked fury from Brexiteers, including Reform UK's Nigel Farage , who branded it a "betrayal" of the 17.4million Britons who voted Leave. Then, on Monday morning, he insisted he would not take Britain back into free movement without a referendum, vowing to "never move ahead of the British public when it comes to Brexit". By lunchtime, on the Prime Minister's claims. A No 10 spokeswoman said: "So, the Prime Minister isn't proposing a return to freedom of movement, or any option. He is saying that it's time for us to discuss what kind of long-term relationship with Europe is best for Britain, and he is referring to the types of areas that that agreement and long-term future could cover." Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT She added: "He is crucially not leaning either way, and that will be for the British public to decide." Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT The bewildering U-turns . Mr Burnham has already ruled out rejoining the EU in this Parliament, but signalled he could fight the next general election on a promise to take Britain back into the bloc. The options he is reported to see on the table include full EU membership or joining the single market, which would mean accepting free movement. Reform UK leader Mr Farage branded his comments a "total betrayal of Brexit". Mr Burnham will meet EU chiefs at a crunch summit in Brussels on November 20. No 10 said the PM's focus was on the summit and practical arrangements that it claimed would "add billions to the economy". Brexit News Nigel Farage European Union Andy Burnham Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments

Read the original article on express.co.uk (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Express

Everything we scored from Daily Express