GB News, on UK Politics, 29 October 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

LGBT Veterans win first stage of court battle over MoD's 'unfair and irrational' LGBT compensation scheme

No framing issues found.

Veterans win first stage of court battle over MoD's 'unfair and irrational' LGBT compensation scheme Steven Stewart, 55, and Mark Shephard, 49, received just £7,000 and £5,000 respectively Sign up to the News Newsletter I agree to receive updates and information about my account, the GB News Community, and related products and services from GB News. Email address Sign up By signing up you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy and Community Rules.

Thank you for signing up! See the latest from GB News here . Choose GB News on Google - add us as a preferred source Choose GB News Support GB News Champion free speech and independent journalism while unlocking exclusive benefits. Support us Veterans have won the first stage of their legal battle over the Ministry of Defence (MoD)'s "unfair and irrational" compensation scheme. Steven Stewart, 55, and Mark Shephard, 49, were "forced to resign" from the armed forces because of their sexuality or perceived sexuality.

A ban on LGBT+ personnel was in place between 1967 and 2000, meaning that those thought to be gay or transgender faced interrogation and dismissal. As a result of their resignations, they were eligible for the LGBT Financial Recognition Scheme, set up by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) in 2024. TRENDING Stories Videos Your Say Mr Stewart and Mr Shephard received £7,000 and £5,000 respectively, but had their applications for a larger payment refused because they were not formally dismissed or discharged.

Last week, Defence Secretary Wes Streeting told The Guardian the MoD was looking to resolve the case with a "way forward that doesn’t require legal action. But on Wednesday, a judge ruled the two men could take their claim for further compensation to a full hearing, likely to take place in January. Mrs Justice Eady said: "I am persuaded this is a matter that warrants further consideration by the court." Under the current scheme, claimants can receive a flat-rate payment of £50,000 if a veteran was dismissed or administratively discharged in the ban.

LGBT veterans dismissed can receive either a flat £50,000 or 'impact payments' of £20,000 from the Ministry of Defence | PA Or, if affected by the ban, LGBT+ veterans can receive "impact payments" of up to £20,000. Isabelle Agerbak, representing the two men, argued that this means those dismissed are eligible for up to £70,000, while those who resigned after an ultimatum are eligible for up to £20,000. The court heard how Mr Stewart, from the South West, served as a corporal in the Royal Military Police from 1988 until 1995.

He was told that "incriminating letters" had been found as he was "stripped of his duty pistol and escorted into the office of his commander". LATEST ARMY NEWS: Bring back national service in wake of new Russia threats, ex-Royal Marine Labour MP says Huge £15million museum celebrating Royal Marines' proud history opens in Portsmouth More than a fifth of veterans feel 'disconnected' at home as 'UK's Superman' reveals his solution The military now embraces the LGBT community and has marched at Pride in London (pictured) | UK MOD/CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025 He was interviewed under caution and resigned after being told he would face a court-martial and potential prison sentence.

Mr Stewart said: "Leaving under those circumstances was devastating. My military career ended overnight. The impact of that decision has stayed with me ever since. "I rebuilt my life, but what happened has stayed with me for nearly three decades. It affected my confidence, my relationships and how I saw myself." Mr Shephard, from Taunton, Somerset, served in the Royal Air Force from 1995, but in 1999 he broke down in front of his commanding officer after persistent bullying and told her he was gay, as he was unaware of the ban at the time.

He later applied to leave the Army after being told he would otherwise be summarily dismissed. The High Court judge has allowed the two men to carry their claim forward | GETTY Mr Shephard said he was "driven out of the career I trained hard to achieve and excelled at" and had only recently told his friends and family the real reason he left the RAF. In written submissions, Ms Agerbak said the scheme is "irrational and unfair". She said: "It is entirely unclear how and why the defendant arrived at an outcome whereby those who were compelled to resign would be eligible for tens of thousands of pounds less than those with similar experiences, but who were dismissed or discharged."

Amanda Jones, for the MoD, said the claim is "not arguable", adding the scheme had a "limited total budget" and was set up to "mark and alleviate harm", but did not concede any legal liability. She said £75million has been spent on the scheme and that making it available to those who were forced to resign would result in "a very significant additional sum". She said claimants who resigned rather than were dismissed benefited, including receiving a positive employment reference and not having to repay a £4,000 bonus.

It is estimated that around 200 to 250 military personnel left the service each year as a result of the LGBT+ ban. Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter News Vile thugs jailed for ‘ferocious’ attack on football fan after Old Firm derby News Ineos slams Labour's budget as 'a major missed opportunity to save British manufacturing' in scathing attack News Nottinghamshire ​minster ​could become first Church of England cathedral forced to close News Engineering company fined £20,000 after man suffers 'finger amputation' News Man killed after SUV smashes into Lidl pictured for first time News Swansea pub landlords say John Healey's Budget has not gone far enough to support hospitality sector News Jordan hits back after terror attack on church left nine Christians dead and 28 injured News National Grid boss insists he is 'right man for the job' as MPs probe 'toxic culture' amid blackout fears News Men banned from gym spa sessions as women feel uncomfortable for 'religious reasons' News Three people hospitalised after plane crash as emergency services rush to scene News Tommy Robinson found guilty of harassing two journalists News Toilet paper sales soar after Britons urged to stockpile 'be ready' emergency kits News Government website crashes just minutes after John Healey's £100 council tax payment announcement News Taxpayers foot bill for £20k 'state-of-the-art' podcast studio in high-security prison News Christmas market cancelled for SECOND year in a row as locals fume with council for refusing funding News Grief campaigner found dead on same beach her son passed away six years ago News London Tube station evacuated as emergency services rush to scene News Van driver who deliberately ran over cyclist in road rage row jailed but avoids driving ban News Teenage boy who stabbed girl 10 times after she rejected his romantic advances spared jail News Outrage as Apple admits issue with folding iPhones after customers report cracking screen News Climate change should be formally declared 'global health emergency', new study suggests News RAF Fairford suspects in court over alleged Iran-linked terror plot News Royal Navy deploys three of Britain’s four submarines armed with ballistic missiles carrying nuclear warheads News Jacob Rees-Mogg speaks out on GB News from pro-life march on anniversary of Abortion Act News Majority of Britons want UK to produce its own oil and gas instead of importing, new poll shows News Teenage waitress wins more than £13,000 in tribunal after being shouted at for dropping apple crumble News Andrew Tate investigation probed by police watchdog over handling of 'child sex' videos News Neighbour from hell hurls dirty nappies into homeowner's garden in seven-year 'torture' campaign News British experts design AI missiles that can protect UK from Russia with 'mini Iron Domes' News Residents of 'Britain’s unhappiest town' plead with Chancellor ahead of Budget: 'We need help!'

Read the original article on gbnews.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

GB News reports that two LGBT veterans who were forced to resign under the armed forces ban have been allowed to take their claim over the MoD's compensation scheme to a full High Court hearing. It attributes the claimants' case to their barrister and gives the MoD's response at length. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “Isabelle Agerbak, representing the two men, argued that this means those dismissed are eligible for up to £70,000, while those who resigned after an ultimatum are eligible for up to £20,000.”

    The article attributes the comparison of payments to the claimants' barrister instead of stating it as its own conclusion, and gives the figures the argument rests on.

  • “A ban on LGBT+ personnel was in place between 1967 and 2000, meaning that those thought to be gay or transgender faced interrogation and dismissal.”

    The article states plainly what the ban did to service personnel, giving the reader the context for why the compensation scheme exists.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from GB News

  1. 29 OctAndy Burnham gags Cabinet on rejoin EU plot as Labour braces for Brexit civil war3.0
  2. 29 OctDWP Cold Weather Payments start this weekend - check if you're eligible0.0
  3. 29 OctEconomy warning: UK living standards to flatline as Britons face £180billion tax squeeze3.0
  4. 29 OctJohn Healey insists Labour is 'doing a good job on migration' despite OBR saying arrivals may double over next five years6.0
  5. 29 OctNigel Farage says Reform UK cannot police its own members over Tommy Robinson support3.0

Everything we scored from GB News