The Independent, on Iran, 3 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

More bombing, a nuclear strike or a peace deal: Three scenarios for the war in Iran after the midterms

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Become an Independent member to bookmark this article Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today. Join today Already a member? Log in President Donald Trump launched strikes on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz on the eve of the US mid-term elections, resuming a conflict with Iran that has languished in a stalemate for months. US officials said the strikes were defensive measures against Iranians using surface-to-air ⁠missiles on a US aircraft, describing them as limited.

Iran’s state news agency IRNA reported several explosions across the island on Monday. On Monday Trump told Axios that he was in “no rush” to restart the fighting. Recent briefings from the Pentagon had suggested that the attacks could continue after the voting had taken place. Below we look at the three ways that the US could either escalate or end the war. open image in gallery The Trump administration launched strikes in Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz on Monday ( AFP/Getty ) A negotiated peace deal It is likely that discussions to end the conflict between both parties will continue, despite Trump’s recent threats.

Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said on Monday: “Consultations and discussions have become very intensive. We have set out our conditions and our plan, and everything depends on Washington’s political rationality – if they choose sincere diplomacy, we are ready to engage, and if they intend deception and military action, they will face a response more bitter and heavier than before.” A source close to the White House told Axios that talks “progressed positively” and that “mediators are working on bridging the gaps and remaining concerns shared by the two sides from yesterday’s meetings.”

Last week, the Wall Street Journal reported that vice president JD Vance had reached out to top security officials and hard-liners in Tehran . Trump said he had approved of Vance’s attempt to make contact. open image in gallery Abbas Araghchi said that talks had been going well ( AFP/Getty ) “He asked me what I thought. I said, ‘If you want to do that, that’s ok.’” More moderate members of the Trump administration will be eager to resolve the war urgently, with rising inflation and record-high gas prices affecting ordinary Americans and deepening Trump’s unpopularity ahead of the midterm elections.

Major bombing campaign Trump could also opt to continue attacking Iran in a similar vein to the campaigns conducted early on in the conflict. This could include attacks on military infrastructure, energy facilities and other key targets such as suspected nuclear plants. However, this could prove costly and . It would also likely spillover into neighbouring countries, affecting both US and Iranian partners and damaging global energy markets.

US senator Chris Murphy said that he had been briefed on the plan to resume bombing Iran - and called it “insane”. “Trump is reportedly planning to restart war with Iran after the election,” he said last week. “Some of us have been briefed on the war plan. And while I cannot disclose any details, I can say this: the plan is insane. It will not achieve objectives and will set off a new cycle of escalation.” Huge escalation open image in gallery A satellite view shows tunnel entrances at Pickaxe Mountain, of the Natanz nuclear facility, near Natanz, Iran, June 30, 2026 ( Vantor ) On Monday, Tucker Carlson made the spectacular claim that Trump could be seriously considering launching nuclear strikes on Iran “within days”, under the influence of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu .

“Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran,” Carlson wrote in a post on social media. “The target would be Pickaxe Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program.” He did not provide any evidence of his claims but cited an “informed observer”. Pickaxe Mountain is a suspected underground facility that l ies on the south side of Iran's Natanz nuclear enrichment site , an is one that was bombed by the US and Israel in June 2025.

Carlson claimed that conventional US weapons could not strike deep enough to hit the reported underground tunnels where nuclear enrichment is allegedly taking place. “The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. ‘Bibi calls Trump about it every day,’ says an informed observer,” he wrote.

Read the original article on independent.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Independent sets out three possible paths for the US war on Iran after the midterms. It attributes the US claim that the Qeshm strikes were defensive, names the US and Israel as the attackers on Natanz, and notes that Tucker Carlson gave no evidence. It slips once into its own verdict, calling the Iranian position "obstinate" when its own quotation from Iran's foreign minister shows a conditional offer to negotiate.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “further push the Iranians into an even more obstinate position”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet calls Iran's negotiating stance "obstinate", and pins it on "the Iranians" as a whole rather than on Iran's government.
    The impression it gives
    Iran's position is stubborn refusal, and the Iranian people as a whole share it.
    The context
    The article's own quotation from Iran's foreign minister sets out a conditional position: Iran is ready to engage if Washington offers sincere diplomacy. Reuters reports Tehran rejecting what it calls Washington's excessive demands. That is a negotiating position, not obstinacy, and it belongs to Iran's government, not to the Iranian people.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “President Donald Trump launched strikes on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz”

    It names who struck in the active voice instead of writing that explosions hit the island.

  • “bombed by the US and Israel in June 2025”

    It names both states that bombed the Natanz site rather than hiding the actor.

  • “He did not provide any evidence of his claims”

    It tells the reader plainly that Carlson's claim, which relies on Israeli intelligence and an unnamed observer, comes with no evidence.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Independent

  1. 3 NovIran's chief negotiator says the US must act to prevent renewed war, and other Mideast news6.0
  2. 3 NovUS strikes Iran with explosions heard on Qeshm Island in Strait of Hormuz0.0
  3. 3 NovUS military attacks Iran's Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz on the eve of midterm elections6.0
  4. 3 NovStreeting condemns Iran for labelling RAF and Royal Navy terrorist organisations6.0
  5. 2 NovStreeting condemns Iran for labelling RAF and Royal Navy terrorist organisations6.0

Everything we scored from The Independent