City AM, on UK Politics, 28 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

:

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

Britain’s biggest businesses , a City AM analysis has found, laying bare the scale of pressure facing firms amid surging employment costs and the growing tide of automation. The analysis compiled more than 250 separate media reports of layoffs, job cuts and company administrations at major businesses since Labour took office in July 2024. It identified at least 137,000 jobs lost or announcements of planned job losses across top British companies.

That includes the likes of carmaker Jaguar Land Rover, which earlier this year said it would cut as many as 4,000 roles, as well as hospitality firm Whitbread, which axed 3,800 roles, and supermarket Sainsbury’s, which last year cut 3,000 staff. The layoffs follow a jump in employment costs over the last two years, including hikes to national insurance contributions, minimum wage rises and a tightening of employment laws. Chancellor John Healey is expected to impose another above-average increase to the minimum wage at the Budget this afternoon, piling further pressure on businesses.

Shadow chancellor Andrew Griffith told City AM : “There is a direct connection between the jobs tax and firms laying off staff. “It was entirely foreseeable that when you put up the cost and the risk of something, you’ll get less of it. ” Retail and hospitality jobs on the front line Around 30 per cent of the job losses identified came from the financial, legal and professional service sectors.

That includes the likes of Barclays, which last week said it expected to shed as many as 5,000 roles through increasing use of automation, echoing similar moves among insurance businesses and big-four accounting firms. But an even bigger share of jobs cut came from the retail and hospitality sectors, which account for around 45,000 of the job cuts identified, following thousands of shop, pub and restaurant closures over the past two years.

Official government data suggests the redundancy rate has been gradually creeping higher, from as low as two redundancies per 1,000 employees in September 2023 to as high as five in September 2025, while Google data suggests the frequency of searches for “redundancy” have doubled over the same period. The UK unemployment rate hovered around five per cent in the first half of 2026, compared to around four per cent when Labour took office, while in September, the total number of vacancies fell below 700,000 for the first time in five years.

But the bigger worry for the government has been the number of young adults who are not in work, training or education, so-called ‘Neets’, which now stands at almost 1m 16-24 year olds. “Some of that is driven by increases in the National Living Wage, increases in the NICs, which has made hiring entry-level jobs much more difficult,” said Ben Caswell, senior economist at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research. “For an entry-level worker, it was a ten per cent increase in the unit labour costs of hiring someone in just a single year.

That’s going to be a pretty big driver for reducing vacancies.” Caswell said there was no “smoking gun evidence” that AI had been a major cause the steady rise in unemployment and decline in vacancies in the UK. “It’s not like those sectors where you’d expect [AI] to be more concentrated in are the ones that are seeing the big dip in vacancies. It’s quite broad-based,” he said. Insolvency expert Molly Monks of Parker Walsh said hospitality firms had accounted for the lion’s share of companies who have approached her after struggling with a cash flow crunch.

“Profit margins are so small, and the footfall isn’t what it was, that people are just finding everything a little bit too tight – and once you slip, it’s very difficult to get back [on track] – it’s a very fast downward spiral,” she said. “Business rates and rent are really difficult. And then employees [have become] very expensive… and companies are just struggling to keep up.”

Read the original article on cityam.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

City AM's headline says Britain's biggest firms cut more than 130,000 roles, but the body counts announced and planned cuts from media reports too, including 'as many as' estimates. The outlet adds its own 'Jobs apocalypse' label and gives no comparison to show whether the figure is unusual. Only the Conservative shadow chancellor speaks on the politics, with no response from the government whose policies the article blames.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “Britain’s biggest firms cut more than 130,000 roles in two years”

    Why this matters
    The headline says the firms 'cut' more than 130,000 roles, stated as completed job losses.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes more than 130,000 people have already lost their jobs at Britain's biggest firms.
    The context
    The body says the count covers 'jobs lost or announcements of planned job losses', compiled from media reports. It includes upper estimates such as Barclays expecting to shed 'as many as 5,000 roles' and Jaguar Land Rover saying it 'would cut as many as 4,000'. Some of the total are plans and ceilings, not jobs gone.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“jobs lost or announcements of planned job losses”
    • Elsewhere in the article“expected to shed as many as 5,000 roles”
    • Elsewhere in the article“said it would cut as many as 4,000 roles”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Britain's big firms have announced or made at least 137,000 job cuts in two years, City AM's count of media reports finds.

  2. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “have axed more than 130,000 jobs over the past two years”

    Why this matters
    City AM states in its own voice that firms 'have axed' the jobs, and gives the total with no earlier period or normal level of job cuts to compare it with.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the 130,000 figure is a count of jobs actually lost and that it is unusually high.
    The context
    The figure comes from compiling 'more than 250 separate media reports' and mixes planned cuts with real ones. The article offers no comparison for an earlier two-year period, so the reader cannot tell whether it is high.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“compiled more than 250 separate media reports”
    • Elsewhere in the article“announcements of planned job losses”

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Jobs apocalypse”

    Why this matters
    City AM labels the job cuts an 'apocalypse' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the labour market is collapsing.
    The context
    The article's own figures describe a gradual change. Unemployment is around five per cent against around four per cent in July 2024, and the redundancy rate is 'gradually creeping higher'.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the redundancy rate has been gradually creeping higher”
    • Elsewhere in the article“hovered around five per cent in the first half of 2026”

    Show it in the article

  4. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “But with almost zero business experience in the Cabinet, Labour didn’t listen.”

    Why this matters
    City AM gives the Conservative shadow chancellor three sentences to blame Labour and attack the Cabinet's business experience. It prints no reply from the government or the Treasury.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the government has no answer to the charge that its policies caused the job cuts.
    The context
    The article never reports a government or Treasury response, although the story is about the effect of Labour's policies.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Treasury”.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from City AM

  1. 27 OctAutumn Budget 2026: In defence of cheaper gherkins, nature’s Ozempic0.0
  2. 27 OctDevelopers urge Labour to cut red tape and boost housebuilding3.0
  3. 27 OctPension reform means Brits don’t have to wait for billionaires to give them shares0.0
  4. 27 OctPossible tax hikes for LLPs in Budget may ‘distort’ the market and push firms overseas3.0
  5. 27 OctICAEW chief: Britain can’t build a better economy one Budget at a time0.0

Everything we scored from City AM