The Telegraph, on UK Politics, 1 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Britain’s energy policy is driving us to Middle East, says gas storage boss

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

The owner of one of Britain’s biggest gas-storage facilities because of , its chief executive said. Peter Mann, head of energy group Kistos, said future spending by the company would go to places such as Oman because the UK lacked a stable tax regime for oil and gas. He said the Middle East would remain more appealing than the UK until energy strategy was taken out of ministers’ hands and given to an independent regulatory body.

Mann said this would mean “people know where they stand”. “That ultimately is the key to investment. That stability has gone in the UK,” he said. Kistos Energy owns Hill Top, one of the few remaining gas storage sites in the UK that can deliver the gas equivalent of 11pc of the UK’s daily total. The 46-year-old, son of colourful ex-army officer and mercenary Simon Mann , and, like his father, a former officer in the Scots Guards, founded the company just six years ago.

Since then it has followed a trajectory similar, albeit on a smaller scale, to that of Neo Next+, the 2018 start-up that is now the UK North Sea’s biggest operator. Both have bought up assets pioneered by energy majors but then sold off as they quit the North Sea – . Mann says he would like to invest more in the UK, including in gas storage projects like Hill Top, but is exasperated by the constant regulatory changes politicians have imposed on the oil and gas industry in recent years.

Kistos is still investing in the UK – but only just. It has bought the nearby Hole House gas caverns too and plans to reopen them for gas storage in the next couple of years. Mann thinks Kistos is the only UK company spending private capital to actually increase the country’s domestic gas storage capacity. Back in 2022, it also bought into gas production with stakes in four fields off the Shetlands known as the Greater Laggan area, along with associated pipelines and a gas plant.

But frustrated by an unpredictable windfall tax regime, bureaucratic paralysis over North Sea drilling and , Kistos’s future investments are mostly heading abroad. It has recently spent $148m (£110m) on stakes in oil fields in Oman, with plans to invest a further $100m in the next three years, plus similar amounts in Norway’s North Sea – where Kistos bought Mime Petroleum in 2023.

“I think we are the only ones in the UK investing in increasing the capacity of gas storage at this point in time ... But Kistos is not in a place where it has to do things just in the UK, so we can be selective and opportunistic in where we see value,” he says. For Britain, the consequences of this domestic investment freeze are severe – the decline of the North Sea and the UK’s inadequate storage means .

That goes on importing foreign energy – especially gas – subsidising overseas jobs and tax revenues while exposing British households to extreme winter volatility. If Britain manages to keep the lights on and avoid gas shortages this coming winter, it will be thanks in no small part to some of the nation’s largest but least visible assets which are owned by Kistos. They lie deep beneath the rolling fields of Cheshire comprising an array of giant salt caverns pumped full of pressurised natural gas which are now amongst our most vital gas supply bulwarks.

Cheshire’s salt caverns are among the UK’s least appreciated geological assets. Around 200 million years ago the region was covered in shallow seas that evaporated, leaving salt layers hundreds of metres thick, now buried deep underground. They have been mined for centuries – providing, for example, the rock salt that keeps our roads free of ice. But it’s the impermeable caverns drilled into the remaining salt, 600 metres below ground, that are now filled with gas, the region’s most vital energy asset.

“Our caverns are connected to the national transmission network,” said Mann. “We can empty them really quickly and do 11pc of [the] UK’s daily gas requirement, but then you can fill it up quite quickly in three or four days and do the same thing again.” That facility means companies like Kistos can respond fast to changes in demand for gas – releasing more if temperatures plunge and demand surges. Or soaking up surpluses when demand falls.

That buffers the UK’s gas consumers against shortages. And it’s also profitable – for example by exploiting price swings to buy when demand falls or supply surges, and then reselling as prices go up. It sounds like an easy way to make money, but Kistos is now one of just a handful of companies still operating in this market. Its nearest rival is Storengy, a subsidiary of French energy giant Engie, which runs the nearby Stublach site. Another used to be Centrica, owners of British Gas and of the much larger Rough gas storage site – a depleted gas field in the North Sea that could hold about three weeks’ worth of UK gas supply.

However, Chris O’Shea, the Centrica boss, has declared that the site cannot run at a profit and plans to shut it down next April – unless the Government provides funding. The caverns under Cheshire that now help underpin UK gas supplies could have gone the same way. Another facility at Hatfield Moor, near Doncaster, shut down two decades ago, while EDF shut down the Hole House site, in Cheshire, just a few years ago. Hole House is now being reopened by Kistos.

Those closures are one reason why the UK is facing this winter with a wafer-thin margin of gas reserves. “We now have just six or seven days of security of storage available in the UK,” warns Mann. His warnings are echoed by many others. UK storage is only 36pc full, according to energy economist Nick Butler, a former BP vice-president and Downing Street adviser. “That is well below the level in other countries across Europe ... In the circumstances, it is surprising that the UK Energy Secretary has not made a statement on the issue to Parliament,” he wrote on Substack.

, Cheshire’s salt caverns will remain an isolated buffer against the cold while British capital investment continues to find a warmer, more welcoming home under the desert sun.

Read the original article on telegraph.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Telegraph turns one oil and gas chief executive's complaints about UK energy policy into its own statements of fact, blaming politics for the majors leaving the North Sea, asserting a sector-wide mood with no source and closing on its own verdict about "commercial sanity". Its opening says Kistos is ditching UK investment, while its own body shows the company reopening a UK gas site. The Government whose policies are called crippling never answers.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “driven out by the UK’s divisive energy politics”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Telegraph states that energy majors quit the North Sea because they were "driven out" by UK politics.
    The impression it gives
    That the majors' exit from the North Sea is an established effect of UK political decisions.
    The context
    This is the causal case Mann makes. The article gives no source for it and no other explanation of why the majors left.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“because the UK lacked a stable tax regime for oil and gas”

    Show it in the article

    “a political class that treats energy policy as a tactical football”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph adopts Mann's grievances as its own description, calling the windfall tax "unpredictable", drilling decisions "bureaucratic paralysis" and politicians a class treating policy "as a tactical football".
    The impression it gives
    That these are neutral facts about UK policy, not one company's complaints.
    The context
    Elsewhere the article attributes this exasperation to Mann himself. Here the attribution is dropped and no one defends the policy.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“is exasperated by the constant regulatory changes”

    Show it in the article

    “Such views are increasingly common in the UK oil and gas sector.”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph asserts a growing sector-wide view with no survey, no second company and no named source.
    The impression it gives
    That Mann speaks for a widening consensus across the industry.
    The context
    The only industry executive quoted on investment is Mann. Nick Butler is quoted only on storage levels, not on investment.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“UK storage is only 36pc full”

    Show it in the article

    “the country haemorrhages billions each year”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph states as fact, in its own voice, that the UK loses billions a year, with no figure, base or source.
    The impression it gives
    That a measured loss of billions follows directly from the "investment freeze" Mann describes.
    The context
    The article gives no number and no source for this loss. It also links the loss to an "investment freeze" that its own body contradicts, since Kistos is still investing in UK storage.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Kistos is still investing in the UK”

    Show it in the article

    “Until the UK restores commercial sanity to its energy policy”

    Why this matters
    The news report ends on the Telegraph's own verdict that UK energy policy lacks "commercial sanity".
    The impression it gives
    That the policy is irrational as a matter of fact, not as one side's view.
    The context
    This is the argument of the company boss the piece is built on. It gets the last word and nothing is set against it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the Middle East would remain more appealing than the UK”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Mann blames the windfall tax and repeated regulatory changes for steering Kistos's future spending abroad. The Government's view of its policy is not given.

  2. Opening overstates what the body shows

    Minor

    “is ditching investment in the UK for the Middle East”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph opens by saying Kistos "is ditching investment in the UK for the Middle East".
    The impression it gives
    That the company is pulling its investment out of Britain and moving it to the Middle East.
    The context
    The article's own body says Kistos is still investing in the UK and is reopening the Hole House caverns. Its overseas spending goes to Norway as well as Oman. Mann himself says it is the only company investing in more UK gas storage.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Kistos is still investing in the UK”
    • Elsewhere in the article“plans to reopen them for gas storage”
    • Elsewhere in the article“similar amounts in Norway’s North Sea”

    Show it in the article

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “the Government’s crippling energy policies”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph builds the piece on a charge against the Government's energy policies.
    The impression it gives
    That the charge is uncontested, because nothing is offered against it.
    The context
    No minister, department or Treasury voice responds anywhere in the article. The only other voice, Nick Butler, also criticises the Government.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Treasury” and “Department”.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Telegraph

  1. 1 NovBritain has already paid reparations for slavery3.0
  2. 1 NovJobs cliff-edge looms ahead of workers’ rights overhaul6.0
  3. 1 NovMiliband refuses to investigate Man City owner over Sudan atrocities0.0
  4. 1 NovLetters: Labour’s attack on landlords puts growth even further out of reach0.0
  5. 1 NovLabour set to end almost half of Green council coalitions over Zionism row6.0

Everything we scored from The Telegraph