Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Iran, 2 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Trump on Iran: At some point, we're going to give them the hammer

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

US President Donald Trump warned Sunday that Iran could face a decisive military blow if the conflict continued, saying his desire to avoid further loss of life was the only reason the United States had not already brought the war to an end. Speaking at a campaign rally in Iowa ahead of Tuesday's midterm elections, Trump said, "The only reason we are not finished with Iran is because I want to be nice. I want to try and save all those lives if I can.

But at some point, we're going to have to give them the hammer." The President also predicted that the conflict would conclude shortly, although he did not provide a specific timetable. “It’s going to be over very soon. Very soon." Addressing the economic consequences of the war, Trump defended the increase in oil prices as a necessary cost of protecting the United States and the international community. He said he had anticipated a significantly larger increase in energy prices and predicted that oil would become substantially cheaper once the fighting ended.

“When that war is over, it’s going to come plunging," Trump said. “It’s a very small price to pay for the security of this country and for the world." Trump also . Earlier Sunday, speaking to RSBN before the Iowa rally, Trump indicated that Washington would bring the confrontation to a conclusion through either diplomacy or additional military action.

"We've had such a victory and we'll put it away very soon, one way or the other. Either they'll make a deal or we'll just end it, end it the, I guess you could say, maybe the easy way," he said. The President had expressed cautious optimism about diplomatic efforts during remarks to reporters Saturday night, describing negotiations with Iran as "going fine" and saying he was not "in much of a hurry" to reach an agreement. However, he questioned Tehran's reliability, saying the Iranians "are not very reliable. ...

They make a deal, and then they back out." Trump also identified additional Iranian nuclear facilities as potential targets, including the suspected underground installation known as Pickaxe Mountain. "We can do that in 10 minutes. We have that planned. You can look at Pickaxe Mountain. We need to take care of that. We can do that very quickly," he warned. Meanwhile, indirect negotiations between Washington and Tehran continued under Qatari mediation.

Reports on Saturday indicated that preliminary understandings had been reached concerning Iran's nuclear program, maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz and possible economic incentives for Tehran. An American delegation was also reportedly expected to meet Iranian representatives in Doha as diplomatic efforts continued.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Arutz Sheva reports Trump's threats and predictions about Iran, and it attributes his claims to him rather than stating them as fact. Trump's voice fills the piece. His claim that US strikes stopped Iran getting nuclear weapons stands with no Iranian position beside it, though other outlets that weekend carried Iranian officials' statements on its nuclear stance.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “reiterated his assertion that the American military campaign had prevented Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons”

    Why this matters
    The words "reiterated his assertion" attribute the claim correctly. The article then sets nothing beside it from Iran or the IAEA.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking Iran had been on the way to nuclear weapons and that only US strikes stopped it, with no Iranian position on the record.
    The context
    Other coverage that weekend reported Iran's top security official, Mohsen Rezaei, describing a longstanding Iranian ban on nuclear weapons. Rezaei said no formal decision had been taken to change Iran's nuclear doctrine. The article carries none of this.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “reiterated his assertion”

    The article marks Trump's claim about Iran's nuclear programme as his assertion and does not adopt it in its own voice.

  • “saying his desire to avoid further loss of life was the only reason”

    Trump's stated motive is reported as what he said, not asserted as fact.

  • “Reports on Saturday indicated”

    The claim of preliminary understandings is attributed to reports rather than stated as established.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 2 NovReport: As he weighs Iran strikes after midterms, Trump questions Pentagon leadership3.0
  2. 2 NovIran: Talks are advancing, agreement depends on US 'rationality'3.0
  3. 1 NovIran's missile threat: 1,700 ballistic missiles capable of reaching Israel6.0
  4. 1 Nov'Tough' Trump-Netanyahu call reveals disagreement over Iran war0.0
  5. 1 NovRubio: No deadline for Iran talks, military strikes remain an option3.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News