Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on UK Politics, 26 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

UK Jewish leaders declare Green Party racist over 'Zionism is racism' policy

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

The Board of Deputies of British Jews has formally declared the Green Party of England and Wales a racist organization following its adoption of a resolution equating Zionism with racism. The decision, approved by an overwhelming majority of 118 votes to one, came in response to a policy motion passed at the Greens' annual conference earlier this month. Phil Rosenberg, president of the Board of Deputies, Britain's largest Jewish representative organization, said the party had crossed a fundamental line by adopting a position that characterized a central component of Jewish identity as racist.

"By adopting an antisemitic platform, the Green Party of England and Wales has become a racist party. We will treat it accordingly," he said as quoted by the BBC . "No political party has the right to tell Jews that a central part of our identity, rooted in thousands of years of history, faith and peoplehood, is racist." "The Green Party's policy brands much of our community, including our synagogues and communal organisations, with that slur.

It gives prejudice against Jews a political licence. The Green Party's leadership must now take responsibility for reversing this policy and confronting the antisemitism it has legitimized," said Rosenberg. The Board of Deputies also called on other political parties to refrain from entering coalition agreements or other political arrangements with the Greens unless the controversial policy is repudiated. According to the resolution, parties cooperating with the Greens at either the local or national level would be "failing to take antisemitism with the requisite seriousness" unless the relevant Green leadership had explicitly rejected the motion and committed to overturning it.

The dispute centers on a resolution adopted by Green Party members earlier this month that defines Zionism as an ideology advocating "an ethnonationalist Jewish state in historic Palestine to the exclusion and/ or domination of the non-Jewish population". The motion immediately generated criticism from Jewish organizations, opposition parties, four Green members of Parliament, and two former party leaders. Prime Minister Andy Burnham, who has himself faced controversy over his positions on Israel, condemned the resolution as "completely wrong" and an example of "terrible judgement".

Burnham subsequently announced that his Labour Party would not cooperate politically with the Greens while the policy remained in effect. The Green Party rejected the Board of Deputies' latest condemnation. A party spokesman insisted that the Greens do not discriminate against individuals who identify as Zionists and rejected the Jewish organization's "characterization of this motion and our party". The spokesman added that the decision "will not stop us from speaking out against the genocide in Gaza and pushing for stronger sanctions against the Israeli government and its leaders".

Green Party leader Zack Polanski, who is Jewish, did not participate in the conference vote because he had departed early to campaign in the Holborn and St Pancras parliamentary by-election, which took place several days later. In a subsequent BBC interview, Polanski acknowledged that he wanted changes to the resolution but said he would not seek to repeal it. Under the party's rules, the policy is expected to remain in place until 2028.

Polanski also faced scrutiny during a separate interview on BBC Radio 4 , when he repeatedly declined to answer directly whether Israel has a right to exist. Presenter Nick Robinson pressed the Green leader on the question, but Polanski instead criticized Israel's treatment of and . "I don't believe any state has the right to oppress or to commit apartheid and certainly not genocide on another people," Polanski said, adding, "I don't believe that's a state that anyone should be supporting."

Robinson then asked Polanski to provide a clear "yes/no" response to the question of Israel's right to exist. Polanski again declined to give a direct answer. "I've repeated many times that I want to see equal rights for Israelis and Palestinians - at the moment Palestinians don't have equal rights so I think I'm answering your question really clearly."

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Arutz Sheva reports the Board of Deputies' vote to declare the Green Party racist. It attributes the charge to the Board and Phil Rosenberg, and gives the Greens and Zack Polanski a reply. Its faults are small: it presents genocide and apartheid only as Polanski's accusations, without the findings behind them, and it rewrites Palestinians as "Palestinian Arabs" in its own voice.

  1. Treats documented findings as one man's accusation

    Minor

    “accused the country of apartheid and genocide”

    Why this matters
    The words "accused the country of apartheid and genocide" present genocide and apartheid only as charges Polanski made while dodging a question.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes genocide and apartheid are one politician's personal accusations, with no finding behind them.
    The context
    A UN Commission of Inquiry has found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and B'Tselem have each found that Israel practises apartheid. The article mentions none of these findings.

    How we know

    • On the recordA UN Commission of Inquiry has found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordAmnesty International, Human Rights Watch and B'Tselem have each found that Israel practises apartheid against Palestinians.btselem.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Commission”, “Amnesty” and “B'Tselem”.

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Palestinian Arabs”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet calls the people Polanski spoke about "Palestinian Arabs" instead of Palestinians, the word Polanski himself used.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Palestinians as an Arab population rather than a people with its own name.
    The context
    Polanski's own words, quoted in the same passage, speak of Palestinians, and the outlet substitutes a different label in its paraphrase.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“at the moment Palestinians don't have equal rights”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “UK Jewish leaders declare Green Party racist”

    The headline keeps the charge attributed to the Board of Deputies rather than stating it as the outlet's own verdict.

  • “defines Zionism as an ideology advocating "an ethnonationalist Jewish state in historic Palestine to the exclusion and/ or domination of the non-Jewish population"”

    The outlet quotes the motion's own definition, so readers can judge what the Greens actually voted for.

  • “"will not stop us from speaking out against the genocide in Gaza and pushing for stronger sanctions against the Israeli government and its leaders"”

    The outlet gives the Green Party's reply in its own words, including its reference to the genocide in Gaza.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News