Al Jazeera English, on West Bank, 10 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Firms tied to West Bank settlements win $15m UK deals despite sanctions

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

The United Kingdom awarded 10.7 million pounds ($14.4m) in new public contracts to firms with links to illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, despite British government pledges to punish companies that profit from settlement activity, an Al Jazeera investigation reveals. The contracts were published after the British government announced new powers on September 8 to sanction companies profiting from business with Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which are illegal under international law.

Recommended Stories list of 4 items list 1 of 4 Who decides the US midterms? list 2 of 4 Alaska Senate candidates trade accusations ahead of election list 3 of 4 Voting underway in closely contested US midterm elections 2026 list 4 of 4 How India pulled 500 million people out of poverty as inequality deepens end of list An analysis of procurement records, company filings, corporate disclosures and contract data supplied by Tussell, a British public sector market intelligence firm, has found that businesses named by the United Nations over their involvement in illegal Israeli settlements – and companies that those businesses ultimately own or control as subsidiaries – have secured contracts across the British public sector.

The companies “appear to be in breach of their legal obligations under international humanitarian law”, Neve Gordon, a professor at the school of law at Queen Mary University of London, told Al Jazeera. “Any UK company that is involved in the occupation is likely to be in direct breach of the sanctions regime Ed Miliband is putting in place,” Gordon said, referring to the UK foreign secretary. This follows a previous Al Jazeera investigation in August which revealed at least 17 companies linked to illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank have been awarded UK public-sector contracts worth more than 2.1 billion pounds ($2.85bn).

Advertisement On September 8, Miliband told the House of Commons the government would now “take action against specific companies and individuals who provide services such as construction, infrastructure, financing or real estate for settlement expansion”. “To those who finance or facilitate illegal settlements, let me say this: you will face the full force of UK sanctions … Settlements are illegal.” Since the announcement, however, UK public bodies have published details of an additional 18 public contracts with companies linked to illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Former Labour Party leader and MP Jeremy Corbyn told Al Jazeera: “Britain cannot credibly claim that it is imposing sanctions on Israeli settlements while letting contracts continue through the back door. The fact that public money is still going to firms that could be targeted under the government’s own sanctions regime … is outrageous and frankly insulting to the public.” Al Jazeera contacted the Cabinet Office for comment about this but received no response.

The Cabinet Office previously told Al Jazeera that individual public authorities make decisions to exclude suppliers on a case-by-case basis for each contract they award. It said public procurement in the UK should not be used to boycott suppliers linked to other countries unless formal British sanctions, embargoes or restrictions are in place. Heidelberg Materials One group that the UN listed in its September 2026 settlement index update for its commercial use of natural resources in the occupied Palestinian territory is Heidelberg Materials, a multinational building materials firm with headquarters in Germany.

Three Heidelberg subsidiaries were named in 14 contracts worth , mostly to undertake roadworks and resurfacing for National Highways and councils in Nottingham and Lincolnshire in central-eastern England. The group has been granted at least 35 UK contracts worth about 194.7 million pounds ($261m) across five of its subsidiaries. Its Israeli subsidiary, Hanson Israel, owns the Nahal Raba quarry, south of Qalqilya in the West Bank.

The quarry sits on land belonging to the Palestinian villages of az-Zawiya and Rafat, according to Who Profits, a group that researches links between the private sector and the economy in the occupied territory. An official Civil Administration Service planning notice reviewed by Al Jazeera shows a proposal was approved to expand the site. According to the company’s website, the firm undertakes “quarrying, grinding and screening of natural dolomite or limestone rock”.

Advertisement Heidelberg has previously told Al Jazeera that Hanson Israel ceased operations at the quarry and its associated plants in 2023. But Who Profits said approval for the expansion of the quarry was granted on May 28, 2025. Heidelberg did not dispute the Who Profits assertion in its response to Al Jazeera’s questions. Motorola Solutions Two contracts, worth about 87,900 pounds ($118,000), have been awarded to Motorola Solutions and its subsidiaries to provide communications for the police service.

Motorola Solutions still accounts for the largest share by value of the contracts Al Jazeera identified, with about 1.7 billion pounds ($2.28bn), most of it through its UK subsidiary Airwave Solutions. The Home Office awarded Airwave an extension worth 1.562 billion pounds ($2.13bn) to provide the secure communications network used by police, fire and ambulance services across England, Scotland and Wales. Motorola Solutions UK separately holds contracts worth 123.9 million pounds ($170m), including a 36.5-million-pound ($49.8m) Ministry of Defence contract for Airwave radios, accessories and airtime.

The UN lists Motorola Solutions for its settlement-related activities, including the provision of security equipment and services. Procurement records reviewed by Al Jazeera show Motorola command-and-control technology used in security and surveillance infrastructure by authorities in the occupied West Bank. Al Jazeera contacted the Motorola Solutions group for comment but received no response. Fosun Chinese conglomerate Fosun International is identified by the UN under the category covering the commercial use of natural resources, particularly water and land.

Its connection to the occupied West Bank centres on Israeli cosmetics manufacturer Ahava Dead Sea Laboratories. In the UK, Breas Medical, which Fosun International owns through Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical, secured a contract worth 98,000 pounds ($131,000) with Hull hospitals. The award brings the total value of public-sector contracts held by the group to at least 1.3 million pounds ($1.74m). Al Jazeera contacted Fosun for comment but received no response.

Egis French engineering group Egis provides another type of connection via transport infrastructure linking illegal Israeli settlements in occupied East Jerusalem with the rest of the city. The UN lists Egis in connection with the “provision of services and utilities supporting the maintenance and existence of settlements, including transport”. Egis told Al Jazeera it “formally expressed its disagreement with this inclusion” in the UN database.

A new contract worth 84,000 pounds ($113,000) was awarded to Thomas & Adamson International Limited, a subsidiary of Egis. The award brings the total value of public contracts held by Egis and its subsidiaries to at least 133.7 million pounds ($179.3m).

Read the original article on aljazeera.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Al Jazeera reports its own investigation showing UK public bodies awarded 10.7 million pounds in new contracts to firms linked to illegal Israeli settlements, after the government announced sanctions powers. It names the occupied West Bank, states that the settlements are illegal under international law, reports Who Profits' account that the Nahal Raba quarry sits on the land of two Palestinian villages, and records company responses and non-responses. The only fault found is minor: one dollar conversion does not match the article's own total.

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “10.4 million pounds ($14.5m)”

    Why this matters
    The article converts Heidelberg's 10.4 million pounds into $14.5m.
    The impression it gives
    A reader may think the Heidelberg contracts alone are worth more in dollars than the whole set of new contracts.
    The context
    The article gives the full total, 10.7 million pounds, as $14.4m. A smaller sterling sum cannot convert to a larger dollar sum, so one of the two conversions is wrong.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“10.7 million pounds ($14.4m)”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “which are illegal under international law”

    Al Jazeera states the settlements' illegality in its own voice as fact, in line with the ICJ's finding (R2), rather than as one side's view.

  • “illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank”

    From the first sentence the article uses the correct legal terms, occupied West Bank and illegal settlements, with no borrowed language such as disputed territory.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al Jazeera English

  1. 10 NovIsraeli forces kill 14-year-old Palestinian boy in occupied West Bank0.0
  2. 8 NovFormer Palestinian detainees at mercy of Israel amid perpetual detention0.0
  3. 6 NovIsrael closes Hebron’s Ibrahimi Mosque to Palestinians for Jewish holiday0.0
  4. 6 NovHow Israel is tightening its grip on Palestinian schools in East Jerusalem0.0
  5. 6 NovIsraeli settlers seize 8 Palestinian homes in Jericho, displacing dozens0.0

Everything we scored from Al Jazeera English