Al Arabiya English, on Iran, 20 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran says three tankers hit mines crossing Hormuz

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) said on Tuesday that their naval mines halted three tankers attempting to travel the Strait of Hormuz via routes considered illegal by Tehran. “Two violating oil tankers were set ablaze and halted due to the explosion of mines planted by the brave sailors of the IRGC Navy at an illegal crossing point in the southern part of the Strait of Hormuz,” the IRGC said in a statement on their official Sepah News website.

For all the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app. The IRGC later said in a statement carried by state TV that a third oil tanker “exploded and caught fire after striking a naval mine south of the Strait of Hormuz.” The statement added that the tanker “carrying over two million barrels of crude oil, had deactivated all of its radar and navigation systems.” Iranian forces have, since the outbreak of the Middle East war, repeatedly targeted ships attempting to pass through Hormuz via a southern route close to the Omani coast.

The conflict began on February 28, when the United States and Israel launched attacks on Iran, killing the country’s supreme leader, along with senior military commanders. Iran has attempted to blockade the strategic waterway, demanding all ships seek its authorization to cross. In peacetime, the Hormuz strait carried around a fifth of the world’s oil supplies. , the United States has imposed a counterblockade on Iranian ports and ships.

On Tuesday, Ali Abdollahi, chief of staff of Iran’s armed forces said the country is using cheap weapons to attack expensive US equipment. “Should the enemy commit any further errors, we will neutralize the impact of their expensive, advanced equipment using a wide array of low-cost yet effective equipment.” Attacks on vessels attempting to cross the waterway have increased in recent days, as Washington seeks to escort more ships through the strait while Tehran seeks to maintain control over their passage.

The IRGC have in recent days said several tankers were hit by mines in the strategic waterway. Read more: Iran foreign minister says Russia, Iran have ‘never’ worked so closely Iran rules out transferring enriched nuclear material abroad amid US tensions Barrack: US not leaving Middle East, but regional allies must take greater responsibility Advertisement Advertisement

Read the original article on english.alarabiya.net (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Al Arabiya English reports the IRGC's claims that its mines halted three tankers south of the Strait of Hormuz and attributes each claim to the IRGC's statements. It names the United States and Israel as the side that launched the war and killed Iran's supreme leader. One phrase in the outlet's own voice casts only the US counterblockade as a response, a minor slant.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “In retaliation”

    Why this matters
    The words "In retaliation" are in the outlet's own voice. They present the US counterblockade as a response to an Iranian wrong. Iran's own measure in S8 is described only as an attempt to "blockade".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Iran's control of the strait as the first move and the US measure as a justified answer to it.
    The context
    The article itself says the war began when the United States and Israel attacked Iran. Iran's restrictions on the strait followed those attacks. The outlet gives the response framing to the US side alone, with no fact in the article to support the difference.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “when the United States and Israel launched attacks on Iran, killing the country’s supreme leader, along with senior military commanders”

    The outlet names who started the war and uses the word killing, in the active voice, for the deaths of Iran's leader and commanders.

  • “Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) said on Tuesday that their naval mines halted three tankers”

    The IRGC's claim is attributed to the IRGC rather than stated as the outlet's own fact, and the headline keeps that attribution.

  • “via routes considered illegal by Tehran”

    The outlet marks the illegality of the southern route as Tehran's view, not as an established fact.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al Arabiya English

  1. 22 OctIran warns US data centers, AI facilities could be targeted if war resumes0.0
  2. 22 OctIran’s IRGC threaten to hit US bases in retaliation for Hormuz escorts3.0
  3. 22 OctTrump says something will happen regarding Iran ‘fairly soon’ 3.0
  4. 21 OctBaghdad closes border crossing with Iran under US pressure: Iraqi sources3.0
  5. 20 OctIran rules out transferring enriched nuclear material abroad amid US tensions3.0

Everything we scored from Al Arabiya English