The Jerusalem Post, on UK Politics, 9 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Around 78% of Britons view Israel as a serious threat to world peace, survey finds

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Around four in five Britons view Israel as a serious threat to world peace, according to a new survey by the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen), published last week.A total of 78% of respondents said they view Israel as a serious threat, compared with 48% 20 years ago. The percentage has also increased a full 10% in the last year.

The number of respondents who said they view the US as a serious threat to world peace was similar to the number for Israel, at 74%. This had doubled in just two years, with the same question receiving 35% in 2024.The country deemed the highest threat to world peace was Russia (89%), followed by Israel, Iran (75%), the USA, North Korea (66%), China (62%) and Saudi Arabia (34%). Israel has surpassed North Korea in the last year.Analyzing the trend, NatCen said Israel's reputation has “seemingly suffered from its involvement in recent Middle East conflict.”“Two decades ago, a little under half regarded Israel as a serious threat to peace.

By the autumn of 2024, by which point Gaza had suffered heavy damage in the wake of Israel's response to the Hamas incursion on October 7, 2023, nearly three-quarters felt that way. And although that figure subsequently dropped a little in the autumn, to around two-thirds, in the subsequent survey this spring, following the Iran bombing campaign, 78% now saw Israel as a serious threat to global peace.”“It is, of course, plausible that, rather than simply judging Israel solely on the basis of its own actions, some people in Britain may fear the risk that developments involving Israel could trigger a much broader regional confrontation, as a catalyst for wider geopolitical instability in the Middle East.”Views on Israel vary across political spectrumViews on Israel also differed significantly by political affiliation.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that the bombing campaign against Iran, which NatCen links to the latest rise to 78%, was carried out by Israel and the US. It refers only to "the Iran bombing campaign", which a reader can take as bombing by Iran or as an event Israel had no part in. Without this fact a reader does not learn that Israel's own military action preceded the jump in the figure the article reports.

How we know

Conservative and Reform supporters were less likely than Labour, Liberal Democrat, and Green supporters to regard Israel or the US as serious threats, while being more likely to view China, North Korea, and Iran as threats.

The divide was particularly pronounced between Green and Reform supporters. Green voters were 26 percentage points more likely than Reform supporters to view Israel as a serious threat, and 46 points more likely to say the same of the US. Conversely, Reform supporters were more likely to regard China, North Korea, and Iran as threats, with gaps of 29, 30, and 35 points, respectively.Views vary across age rangeAnother trend is that younger Britons are more likely than older generations to view the US and Israel as threats to global peace, suggesting a generational shift away from traditional perceptions of Britain's democratic allies.“The findings suggest an important communication challenge for the government, which is central to its legitimacy to pursue the national interest,” .

“Public consensus appears strongest where threats are immediate, visible, and easily understood, as in the case of Russia.“By contrast, where security challenges are gradual, technologically complex, or strategically indirect, as with China, perceptions differ somewhat by age and political outlook. The patterns are even more complex when they pertain to established allies currently pursuing more high-risk foreign policies, such as the United States and Israel.”

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Jerusalem Post reports the NatCen survey figures accurately and attributes NatCen's analysis to NatCen. It refers only to "the Iran bombing campaign" and never says Israel and the US carried it out. It also misnames the source of one quotation as NatSec.

  1. Misnames the source

    Minor

    “NatSec wrote”

    Why this matters
    The Post attributes the quotation about the government's communication challenge to "NatSec".
    The impression it gives
    A different body, apparently a security organisation, wrote this conclusion.
    The context
    The survey and its analysis come from NatCen, the National Centre for Social Research, as the article says at the start.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“National Centre for Social Research (NatCen)”

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that the bombing campaign against Iran, which NatCen links to the latest rise to 78%, was carried out by Israel and the US. It refers only to "the Iran bombing campaign", which a reader can take as bombing by Iran or as an event Israel had no part in. Without this fact a reader does not learn that Israel's own military action preceded the jump in the figure the article reports.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “Green voters were 26 percentage points more likely than Reform supporters to view Israel as a serious threat”

    The party gap is reported accurately: other coverage gives Greens at 88% and Reform at 62%, a 26 point difference.

  • “NatCen said Israel's reputation has”

    The Post attributes the explanation for the trend to NatCen and quotes its words, which match other coverage of the report.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 8 NovPro-Palestine activists spread pamphlets condemning Mann antisemitism review for NHS - report0.0
  2. 7 NovBritain’s colonial legacy undermines its moral lectures against Israel - opinion6.0
  3. 5 NovUK bans Palestinian-American activist flagged by antisemitism watchdog0.0
  4. 5 NovBirmingham council votes to review Israel investments despite warnings the move may be unlawful7.3
  5. 4 NovTo save the BBC, their institutional anti-Israel bias must be investigated - opinion6.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post