Tehran Times, on Iran, 8 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

TEHRAN - A former MEK member testifies that prominent social media accounts, protest groups and opposition channels are operated from the organization's headquarters in Albania, using concealed identities to portray their content as coming from inside Iran. Iranian opposition accounts on social media, particularly on Twitter, now known as X, have long been among the most active and influential accounts during periods of unrest in Iran.

These accounts circulate narratives about what they claim is happening inside the country, publish purported firsthand reports, announce alleged casualties, make claims of revelations and release videos that have not previously appeared online. Their content often receives extensive exposure, with posts attracting hundreds of thousands or even millions of likes and sometimes trending among the platform's most prominent topics. They can generate waves of online activity, amplify particular narratives and shape public perceptions of events in Iran.

At first glance, audiences may assume that the individuals behind these accounts are Iranian citizens operating from inside the country. However, revelations have occasionally exposed a reality markedly different from what their online profiles suggest. Previous reports have raised questions about the role of social media platforms, particularly American companies, in amplifying Iranian opposition accounts, as well as alleged cooperation between platform executives and US security and intelligence agencies.

Critics have also pointed to the removal of accounts supporting the Iranian government or opposing broader US policies. Allegations concerning the Pentagon's and Israel's involvement in social media operations have likewise been the subject of previous reports and disclosures. More recently, fresh revelations concerning several prominent accounts have shed further light on the alleged organization behind such activities. The People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (MEK), also known as the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MKO), is a longstanding armed opposition organization that was previously designated as a terrorist organization by the United States and European countries.

It now operates as an opposition group against the Iranian government. According to figures cited in reports, the organization has been responsible for the killing of more than 17,000 people in Iran. Alongside its assassinations of government officials and ordinary citizens, the MEK has a history of intelligence cooperation with the United States and Israel, with numerous examples cited in accounts of its activities. Former members reveal media operations in Albania Former members of the organization and presented as material generated by individuals inside Iran.

The revelations emerged as proceedings are underway in Iran concerning allegations against the MEK leaders. During one of the hearings, a former member of the organization appeared as a witness and provided details about its media operations. The organization's media structure In his testimony, Mostafa Beheshti, referring to his brief period working in the organization's advertising and midday news department, identified Fahimeh Arvani as the department's principal official.

He said individuals including Asadollah Motanna, Ali Khodaei-Sefat and Saeed Khodaei-Sefat also worked under the department. Beheshti stressed that no independent decisions were made in Iraq, at Ashraf 3 or at other organizational headquarters. "Everything had to be coordinated with the overseas department," he said. According to Beheshti, officials in the organization's foreign department, including Mohammad Mohaddessin, (also known as the planner)- Behnam, Mohammad-Ali Towhidi, Shahin Ghobadi, Afshin Alavi and Shahzad Sadr, held weekly telephone conferences with the internal headquarters to determine what political, satirical or news content should be broadcast.

He said news lines and daily instructions were communicated in a precise and structured manner. "We would receive a ticket or an instruction saying, for example, that these particular stories had to be broadcast at 10 a.m. during the news bulletin," Beheshti said. "We had to find the images they wanted, including those specifically instructed by Brother Behnam, edit them and broadcast them." He added that the foreign department determined which stories would be aired, at what time, for how long and with which images.

In some cases, he said, instructions required content to be broadcast without images to avoid upsetting the host country, whether France or, during the organization's presence in Iraq, the government of the time. Referring to a video presented as evidence, Beheshti said the organization attempted to create the impression that its media content was being produced by young people inside Iran.

According to his testimony, individuals operating from the compound produced targeted analyses and media attacks against Iran's security and law enforcement institutions, as well as various political and social groups. Inside the network of fake accounts and front organizations Beheshti points to deceptive content-production practices at the organization's headquarters. He said the advertising department contained a room known as the "content production room," where individuals recorded videos of themselves while concealing their faces and altering their voices through editing software.

"We had been instructed that the voices must not be real and had to be changed," he said. According to Beheshti, individuals were required to conceal their faces and wear hats, while women were instructed to purchase ordinary headscarves and wear masks. The purpose, he said, was to make the recordings appear as though they had been made in Tehran or another location inside the country. The former member also discussed various media projects and social media networks operating under names and titles associated with professional groups, labor organizations and ordinary citizens.

Among the groups he identified were the Alliance of Retirees and various protest committees. Beheshti said the logos and images used by these groups were linked to teams operating from the organization's headquarters. He identified the following organizations and channels as being based at the compound: * The organizing teams behind protests by contract oil workers. *

According to Beheshti, all these groups were based at Ashraf 3's Compound, where their content, statements and protest-related news were produced. Beheshti also addressed the well-known and controversial "Heshmat Alavi" account, which has published purported documents concerning Iran's nuclear program and other similar material over the years. The identity behind the account had previously been the subject of uncertainty and speculation in US government circles and Western media.

According to Beheshti, the account was administered by Hanif Mojtahedzadeh. He said the organization had claimed that the account belonged to an anonymous Iranian operating inside the country or somewhere in Europe. However, Beheshti said the account had been handed over to Mojtahedzadeh by Afshin Alavi and Behnam Mohaddessin, and that Mojtahedzadeh operated it directly from Ashraf 3 under their supervision. He said this was something the organization did not want anyone to discover.

Beheshti also discussed the "Rasuyab" account, which publishes personal information about officials, security personnel and Basij bases. The account was operated by the communications and security department at Ashraf 3 under the supervision of Abbas Minachi, he said. According to his testimony, the account had no connection to individuals operating inside Iran. Organized account creation across social media platforms Responding to questions, Beheshti referred to his 17 to 18 years of experience working in the organization's internal and advertising departments.

Referring to the number of people involved in the operation, he said that an estimated 2,400 individuals, each creating 20 accounts, would give an indication of the scale of the activity. Beheshti said separate accounts were created for different social and professional groups, including nurses and retirees.

He added that the activity began in 2016 and 2017, when a group of approximately 10 to 12 people was formed. The group's mission, he said, was to establish Telegram accounts, gradually expand into the online environment and teach others how to create accounts. A broader information campaign The broad Media operation target countries opposed to US and Western policies, particularly Iran. According to the former MEK member, the organization sought to create the appearance of widespread domestic opposition by producing content outside Iran and presenting it as material generated by ordinary citizens, professional groups and protesters inside the country.

The objective was to influence public perceptions, amplify unrest-related narratives and shape the online environment in Iran in ways that could serve the organization's political interests. The testimony offers a glimpse into the mechanisms through which opposition networks seek to influence public opinion, while raising further questions about the identities behind prominent social media accounts and the origins of content presented as firsthand reporting from inside Iran.

Read the original article on tehrantimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

Tehran Times reports one former MEK member's testimony in Iranian proceedings against the group's leaders, but in several places it turns that testimony into its own statement of fact. It says former members 'revealed' a link to American platforms that no testimony in the body supports, and it states without attribution that named labour and protest groups were 'actually' run from Albania. None of the accused groups or people is given a response, and the headline promises an answer about Iran's opposition accounts in general that the body does not give.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “have recently revealed, for the first time, that media operations rooms exist at its Ashraf 3 compound in Albania, where extensive anti-Iranian content is produced in cooperation with American social media platforms”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses 'revealed' and plain 'exist' and 'is produced' in its own voice. It adds that the work is done 'in cooperation with American social media platforms'.
    The impression it gives
    That the media rooms and a working partnership with American platforms are established facts.
    The context
    The article's only source is one witness in Iranian proceedings against the MEK's leaders. Nothing in his reported testimony mentions cooperation with any American platform. Earlier in the piece the outlet itself treats platform involvement only as something 'previous reports have raised questions about'.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a former member of the organization appeared as a witness”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Previous reports have raised questions about the role of social media platforms”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    A former MEK member, testifying in Iranian proceedings against the group's leaders, said media operations rooms at its Ashraf 3 compound in Albania produced content presented as coming from inside Iran.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “However, the principal production facilities and operational centers behind the content were located outside Iran, at Ashraf 3 in Albania.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet drops the attribution it gave in the sentence before and states the location of the operation as its own finding.
    The impression it gives
    That it is established that the content was produced at Ashraf 3.
    The context
    This is what Beheshti said while testifying. The article has no other source for it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Beheshti said the organization attempted to create the impression”

    Show it in the article

    “These groups and channels were actually directed and managed from Ashraf 3 in Albania rather than from inside Iran.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet writes 'were actually directed and managed' in its own voice. The sentence covers labour, professional and citizens' groups that are named in the following lines.
    The impression it gives
    That groups such as the Free Union of Iranian Workers and the nurses' protest council are proven MEK fronts.
    The context
    The only basis is one witness's account. The surrounding sentences attribute these claims to him. This one turns his claim into a verdict on real, named organisations.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The former member also discussed various media projects”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Beheshti said the logos and images used by these groups”

    Show it in the article

    “The creation of social media accounts was a systematic organizational activity and that each individual was required to establish approximately 20 accounts across different platforms.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet states the scale and method of account creation with no speaker attached.
    The impression it gives
    That a systematic quota of about 20 accounts per member is a confirmed fact.
    The context
    The figure comes from Beheshti's answers to questions at the hearing. The next sentence shows the larger number is his own rough illustration.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Responding to questions, Beheshti referred”
    • Elsewhere in the article“he said that an estimated 2,400 individuals”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Beheshti told the hearing that groups including the Free Union of Iranian Workers and the nurses' protest council were run from Ashraf 3, and that each member had to create about 20 accounts. The article has no independent confirmation of either claim.

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “The Coordinating Council of Nurses' Protests, which operated under the name "Aid" at Ashraf 3. * The Coordinating Council of Khorasan Protests, managed by an individual named Hadi Jahednia. * The Free Union of Iranian Workers.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet lists named organisations and a named individual as based at an MEK compound.
    The impression it gives
    That the accusation against these groups and people stands with nothing against it.
    The context
    The article never says whether the MEK, these groups or the people named were asked for a response, or whether any of them deny the claims. The only voice is a witness in proceedings brought by the Iranian state against the MEK.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “deny” and “response”.
    • Elsewhere in the article“proceedings are underway in Iran concerning allegations against the MEK leaders”

    Show it in the article

  4. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Who is behind Iran’s most influential opposition accounts?”

    Why this matters
    The headline promises an answer about Iran's most influential opposition accounts in general.
    The impression it gives
    That the article shows who runs the main opposition accounts as a whole.
    The context
    The body rests on one witness's testimony about a handful of named accounts and groups he links to the MEK.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“A former MEK member testifies”

    Show it in the article

  5. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “anti-Iranian content”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls opposition content 'anti-Iranian' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    That criticism of Iran's government and institutions is hostility to Iran or Iranians as a whole.
    The context
    By the article's own description, the content targeted the government, its security and law enforcement institutions, and political groups. That is opposition to a government, not to a people.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“media attacks against Iran's security and law enforcement institutions”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Tehran Times

  1. 8 NovIran holds trial in lawsuit filed by 100 victims of US-Israeli aggression3.0
  2. 8 NovOil storages damaged in war 80% rebuilt, official says0.0
  3. 7 NovIRGC to unveil new underground missile city, vows uninterrupted weapons production0.0
  4. 7 NovThe Iran war signals a tectonic shift toward a non-polar world order: global affairs scholar0.0
  5. 7 NovIranian navy says tanker catches fire after striking sea mine in Strait of Hormuz3.0

Everything we scored from Tehran Times