Millions of leaseholders to be given stronger rights to challenge rip-off service charges
Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding
We do not republish articles from Daily Mirror. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
The Mirror reports new government regulations giving leaseholders in England stronger rights to challenge service charges and limiting landlords' power to pass on legal costs. Most claims are attributed to the government, the Prime Minister and ministers. In its second sentence the Mirror states in its own voice what the protections will achieve, a forecast that belongs to the government. This is a minor lapse.
States one side's claim as fact
Minor
“New protections will stop struggling households from being left out of pocket and saddled with landlords’ legal bills for challenging fees.”
Why this matters
The Mirror says the protections "will stop" households being left out of pocket and "saddled with landlords’ legal bills". It says this in its own voice, with no attribution.
The impression it gives
A reader takes it as settled fact that the rules will end the problem of leaseholders paying landlords' legal bills.
The context
This is the government's forecast. The Mirror's next sentence attributes the narrower claim to the government: it will be "harder" for landlords to pass on costs, and they must still go to a court or tribunal to do so. LBC attributes the measures to "the Government said".
How we know
Elsewhere in the article“the government said it will be harder for landlords to pass on legal costs”
“From April 2027, the government said it will be harder for landlords to pass on legal costs”
It gives the start date and attributes the core claim to the government, and it uses the measured word "harder" rather than promising an end to the practice.
“with landlords set to be forced to go to a court or tribunal to pass on any legal bills”
It explains the concrete mechanism, so a reader knows landlords can still recover costs through a court or tribunal.