LBC, on UK Politics, 26 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

'We could buy them all houses': Nick Ferrari stunned as of

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Nick Ferrari was left stunned after a minister said the Government would spend more than £850 million tackling rough sleeping - The LBC presenter calculated the figure at roughly £190,000 per person, telling Cabinet Office Minister Sally Jameson: “What on earth? We could buy them all houses.” The Government has announced more than £400 million in additional funding , taking its total package to more than £850 million, ahead of a Downing Street summit on rough sleep.

Sally Jameson, Cabinet Office Minister and Labour MP for Doncaster Central, told Nick Ferrari at Breakfast the aim was to ensure that everybody currently sleeping rough is offered a bed and wider support by Christmas. Ms Jameson said the funding would support people beyond Christmas , including through bed spaces, mental health support, substance-misuse services and help sustaining tenancies. Read More: Homeless offered free flu jabs in Burnham pledge to protect rough sleepers Read More: Andy Burnham completes Great North Run half marathon for homelessness charity Asked how many people were homeless, Ms Jameson said there had been a snapshot estimate of about 4,000 people sleeping rough on one night earlier this year, while stressing the figure could change night by night.

Ms Jameson said the £190,000 figure could not be viewed simply as a cost per individual, as it was intended to support thousands of people over time and deliver long-term help rather than only emergency accommodation. “It's not just about the bed space. It's about some of the other wider support that people need in order to really turn their lives around,” she said. “It's not about government dictating exactly how each penny should be spent,” she said.

“We're going to be working with councils and strategic authorities across the country to be guided by them about how we should best spend the money.” Prime Minister Andy Burnham has today said that his pledge is "permanent". Speaking from Downing Street, he said: "I will lead from the front. "And the first thing I can say to you, which I hope makes it feel a little different, is that for as long as I'm here, and as long as this government is in position, this will be permanent.

"This isn't an initiative that you're used to seeing that comes and goes, and then you're left thinking, what was all that about? This is a permanent drive." Ferrari also questioned whether the Prime Minister could meet the target nationally after rough-sleeping figures in Greater Manchester rose from 402 in June 2025 to 444 in June this year, according to the Manchester Evening News. Ms Jameson said the approach in Greater Manchester had made “huge progress”, but suggested people had travelled to the city to access support.

“Because he as mayor was offering that support in that city, more people went to that city in order to access support,” she said. “That’s why we've got to do it across the country so that people are accessing support in their own areas and not all going to Manchester.”

Read the original article on lbc.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

LBC's headline says a minister revealed a £190,000 per-head cost of ending homelessness. Its own body shows that Nick Ferrari worked the figure out, that the minister rejected it as a cost per person, and that the money is for rough sleeping, not all homelessness. The opening sentence also sets the whole package, which the minister says supports thousands of people over time, against a one-night count of rough sleepers, and the article's own numbers do not produce £190,000.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “minister reveals £190,000 per-head cost”

    Why this matters
    The words "minister reveals" put the £190,000 figure in the minister's mouth and present it as an official per-head cost.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the Government itself disclosed that it will spend £190,000 on each homeless person.
    The context
    The body says the presenter did the sum, and the minister disputed it. She said the figure could not be treated as a cost per individual, because the money supports thousands of people over time.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The LBC presenter calculated the figure at roughly £190,000 per person”
    • Elsewhere in the article“could not be viewed simply as a cost per individual”

    Show it in the article

    “ending homelessness”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls the package the cost of "ending homelessness".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the 4,000 people are all of Britain's homeless, and that the sum is meant to end homelessness as a whole.
    The context
    The body describes funding for rough sleeping, measured by a snapshot of about 4,000 people sleeping rough on one night. The stated aim is to offer everyone sleeping rough a bed and support by Christmas.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“snapshot estimate of about 4,000 people sleeping rough on one night”
    • Elsewhere in the article“everybody currently sleeping rough is offered a bed”
    • Elsewhere in the article“ahead of a Downing Street summit on rough sleep”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Nick Ferrari questions £850m rough sleeping package, saying it works out at £190,000 per person; minister says the money will help thousands over time.

  2. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “despite an estimated 4,000 people being counted on the streets on a single night earlier this year”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, LBC uses "despite" to set the full £850 million against one night's count of rough sleepers.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the whole package is spent on a fixed group of 4,000 people, so the sum looks excessive.
    The context
    The minister said the count changes night by night and that the money funds support for thousands of people over time, including mental health and tenancy help. The article's own numbers also do not match: more than £850 million divided by 4,000 is over £212,000, not £190,000.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“stressing the figure could change night by night”
    • Elsewhere in the article“intended to support thousands of people over time”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from LBC

  1. 26 OctBurnham is right: Britain needs an EU reset before our manufacturers are shut out0.0
  2. 26 OctAspirin shortages expose the NHS’s dangerous lack of planning0.0
  3. 26 OctBurnham reveals he 'would like UK to return to EU in his lifetime'6.0
  4. 26 OctEveryone sleeping rough to be given route off the streets by Christmas, Burnham vows3.0
  5. 26 OctThe Mansion Tax is no substitute for fixing Britain’s broken property tax system0.0

Everything we scored from LBC