The Guardian, on Climate, 30 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Britain is unlikely to hit its targets on green heating after the cuts announced by John Healey this week, experts have warned, as critics of Ed Miliband claim the former energy secretary’s green agenda is being dismantled. The chancellor unveiled more than £3bn worth of cuts to the energy department’s budget this week, much of which will pay for higher defence spending. One casualty of the cuts is the government’s scheme to subsidise heat pumps , leading to warnings that clean heating ambitions are being undermined.

Some believe the cuts are evidence of a broader shift away from the pro-renewables agenda pushed by Miliband and his successor, Miatta Fahnbulleh . However, energy department sources insisted the government’s longer-term changes will incentivise people to move towards cleaner power sources and benefit the overall green agenda. Andrew Sissons, a director at the research charity Nesta, said: “After the cuts announced on Wednesday, it is very difficult to see how we can hit our clean heating targets.

It is even possible that a Labour government will be the first to miss the targets it has signed up to in the current carbon budget.” Healey announced on Wednesday that the government would fund the defence investment plan in part through cuts to other departments. Much of that will come from the energy department, including £741m from the boiler upgrade scheme, the government’s plan to incentivise people to replace their gas boilers with electric heat pumps. skip past newsletter promotion Free newsletter | Every day Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day’s headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning Enter your email Sign up after newsletter promotion Homes across UK to get low- or no-interest loans to fund solar panels and heat pumps Read more Under the scheme, a typical household can claim £7,500 towards a heat pump, with about 60,000 a year being fitted in existing homes.

The government has a target to raise that to 250,000 a year by 2030, and was planning to increase the scheme’s funding from £400m this year to just over £700m by 2029-30. The plan forms a key part of the UK’s programme to clean up its heating networks and hit its overall emissions reduction targets. However, ministers said on Wednesday the scheme’s funding would rise only in line with inflation, meaning the number of installations is likely to stagnate or rise much more slowly than previously planned.

“It’s disappointing – so frustrating,” said Ed Matthew, the director of the UK programme at the thinktank E3G. “We are behind a lot of other countries in rolling out heat pumps and we need a sea change in take-up to change that.” Labour is still searching for an energy fix for a new world Read more The cuts to heat pump subsidies came alongside about £250m of other cuts to the warm homes plan, £500m worth of cuts to hydrogen schemes, and £200m to funding for carbon capture and storage technology – all projects once championed by Miliband.

Healey also announced that renewable projects would only be approved in future if they could be shown to bring costs down and were ready to be connected with the grid. Officials insist the government remains committed to its target of having clean power by 2030, though many experts believe that will be impossible under the new system. One government source said: “This is probably the most significant shift we have seen in energy policy since we came to office.

The emphasis now is on cost, not just building to make sure there is enough capacity to hit our green targets.” Paul Ovenden, a former adviser to Keir Starmer, said: “It is fascinating to see the energy capital budgets being raided to fund defence – this is the bones of Ed Miliband’s project being picked clean. “This was something that has been discussed in government before – but Miliband always won that argument. Now he’s not in that department any more, it’s happened.”

Ovenden added: “Had he not helped to oust Starmer and Reeves, he’d probably be in post still and it wouldn’t have been possible.” But allies of Miliband and Fahnbulleh insisted the government’s green agenda remained as strong as ever. They pointed out that Healey also announced a long-term move to shift green costs away from bills and on to taxpayers – something the two energy secretaries have both championed. They also said the government’s intention to change energy markets so electricity prices are no longer so attached to gas prices would help encourage consumers to move away from fossil fuels.

One source said: “Ed and Miatta have both made affordability their focus. It would be wrong to suggest that prioritising cost is in any way a shift away from the green agenda.” A spokesperson for the energy department said: “Over the last two years, we have made considerable progress, thanks to the momentum of clean power 2030, seeing £110bn of private-sector investment announced and securing enough clean power for over 20m homes. “We are committed to making the most of clean, homegrown power and meeting our heat pump target to protect consumers from volatile fossil fuel prices.”

Explore more on these topics Renewable energy Budget 2026 Ed Miliband Miatta Fahnbulleh John Healey Military Energy news Share Reuse this content

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Guardian reports the chancellor's cuts to the energy department, including the heat pump subsidy, and gives experts' warnings and the government's reply. In the body the expectation of missed green heating targets is attributed to experts and disputed by the department, but the headline states it in the paper's own voice. Otherwise the report is careful and sourced.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Healey’s budget cuts mean Britain is likely to miss green heating targets”

    Why this matters
    The headline states, in the Guardian's own voice, that the cuts mean Britain is likely to miss its green heating targets.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the missed targets as the paper's own settled assessment of what the cuts will do.
    The context
    The body attributes this to experts, and the energy department disputes it, saying it remains committed to meeting the heat pump target. The headline drops that attribution and the dispute, though the word likely softens it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Britain is unlikely to hit its targets on green heating after the cuts announced by John Healey this week, experts have warned”
    • Elsewhere in the article“meeting our heat pump target to protect consumers from volatile fossil fuel prices”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “meaning the number of installations is likely to stagnate or rise much more slowly than previously planned”

    The Guardian spells out what an inflation-only rise in funding means in practice for heat pump installations, so readers see the real effect of the cut.

  • “Healey also announced a long-term move to shift green costs away from bills and on to taxpayers”

    The Guardian gives the other side of the policy picture, reporting measures that support the green agenda and not only the cuts.

  • “the government’s plan to incentivise people to replace their gas boilers with electric heat pumps”

    The Guardian explains plainly what the boiler upgrade scheme is for before reporting the £741m cut to it.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 30 OctSevere rainfall and flood warnings issued for central Greece and western Turkey6.0
  2. 30 Oct‘You can see the water going down’: residents on edge as one of England’s worst-hit reservoirs dries up0.0
  3. 30 OctGreener front gardens could help combat air pollution and summer heat3.0
  4. 30 OctClimate academic Andreas Malm barred from entering UK0.0
  5. 30 OctEl Niño-driven drought in Papua New Guinea a ‘national crisis’ as rivers dry up and local farms fail0.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian