Common Dreams, on Iran, 30 September 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

'Not What I Did': GOP Senator When Asked Why He Keeps Voting for Trump's Gas Price-Hiking War

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

An embattled incumbent Republican senator when confronted with his multiple votes supporting President Donald Trump's illegal war with Iran, which has driven up gas prices across the US.During a Wednesday interview with local news station WKRC, Sen. Jon Husted (R-Ohio) was asked by reporter James Pilcher about his votes in favor of continuing the war, which the journalist noted has become "pretty unpopular.""First of all, I didn't, that's not what that vote was, it's not what I did," Husted replied.

"Here's the bottom line: These are the people that want higher gas prices right now: Iran, Russia, and the, and the Democrats in Congress. They don't want us to be successful there. They are literally... we are the party that has been, as Republicans, we've wanted more drilling. Like, we have, thank goodness, we have a great supply of domestic fuel right now, or prices would be even higher."Q: You voted in favor of the war in Iran. It's proven to be pretty unpopular.

What do you see as the offramp here?HUSTED: First of all, I didn't- that's not what that vote was. That's not what I did. Here's the bottom line. These are the people that want higher gas prices right… pic.twitter.com/t4ZEmD0q2f— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 30, 2026 Husted—whom polls show is currently trailing his rival, former Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio)—then baselessly claimed that "Russia, Iran, and Senate Democrats seem to be aligned in seeing prices go up, I'm for prices going down."

The price of energy skyrocketed in the months since Trump attacked Iran without any congressional authorization in February, and the price of diesel fuel last week hit a record high of $6.53 per gallon.Husted, meanwhile, has voted 14 times against war powers resolutions in the US Senate to compel Trump to end the conflict he started.Critics of the Ohio Republican were quick to slam him for trying to evade responsibility for the fallout of the Iran War.In a social media post, author James Surowiecki accused Husted of telling "a blatant lie" when he said he didn't vote to support the war."

This month, he cast the deciding vote against a war powers resolution in the Senate directing Trump to end the war in Iran," Surowiecki wrote. "So yes, he voted in favor of continuing the war in Iran."Husted's statement drew a similar rebuke from Kelsie Taggart, vice president of the Democratic advocacy group American Bridge."That is, in fact, what that vote was," Taggart wrote, "and Husted voted for the war FOURTEEN TIMES."Brian Finucane, a former State Department legal adviser who now advises the US Program at the International Crisis Group, argued that what Husted did was actually "even worse than voting for the Iran War.""He voted to abnegate Congress' constitutional authority over the use of military force," Finucane explained, "and to allow Trump to wage war based on his own whims."

Read the original article on commondreams.org (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Common Dreams reports Sen. Jon Husted's denial that he voted to support the US war on Iran, and sets against it his record of 14 votes against war powers resolutions and the responses of three critics. The record is reported accurately, though the headline says Husted 'Squirms', a verdict on his manner rather than a report of his words. The article also dates the interview to both Tuesday and Wednesday in the same sentence.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Squirms”

    Why this matters
    The headline says Husted "Squirms", a verdict on his manner rather than a report of what he said.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is told how to judge Husted's answer before reading it.
    The context
    The body reports his words, a denial followed by a claim about who wants higher prices. Those quotes let the reader judge the evasion without the label.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“that's not what that vote was, it's not what I did”

    Show it in the article

  2. Contradicts itself on the date

    Minor

    “squirmed on Tuesday”

    Why this matters
    The outlet says Husted squirmed "on Tuesday", then in the same sentence places the exchange in "a Wednesday interview".
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left unsure when the interview took place.
    The context
    The embedded clip is dated 30 September 2026, the day of publication, which fits the Wednesday reference, not Tuesday.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 30, 2026”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Trump attacked Iran without any congressional authorization in February”

    It names who started the war, in the active voice, and when.

  • “author James Surowiecki accused Husted of telling "a blatant lie"”

    It attributes the charge of lying to a named critic rather than making it in the outlet's voice.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Common Dreams

  1. 23 Oct'We May Do Another Little Epic Fury,' Trump Says After Claiming Not to Know About Possible Strike on Iran0.0
  2. 7 OctSenator Says Hegseth Barred Him From Gulf Base to 'Cover Up the True Cost' of Iran War3.0
  3. 29 SeptWhen War Crimes Become Normal: The Price of Impunity0.0
  4. 27 SeptOnly 'Negotiated Solution' Can Get US Out of 'Deadlock,' Iranian Diplomat Says After Trump Rejects Deal0.0

Everything we scored from Common Dreams