Al-Monitor, on Iran, 27 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

UN nuclear watchdog chief urges Iran to grant access

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

IAEA chief Rafael Grossi urged Iran during a UN Security Council meeting on Tuesday to grant immediate access to his agency so it can verify the Islamic republic's nuclear materials. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has not had access to key nuclear facilities in Iran since Israel, joined by the United States, launched a 12-day conflict in June 2025 that included strikes on nuclear sites. in , and the IAEA has repeatedly called for access.

"I invite Iran to work with the IAEA without any further delay to clarify outstanding safeguards questions and to give the IAEA the information and access the agency requires, so that it can verify all relevant facilities and material, as is Iran's legal obligation," Grossi said. The Security Council meeting followed a resolution passed by the IAEA board last month that referred Iran to the top UN body over its nuclear "non-compliance."

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article leaves out what Grossi told the Council in the same speech. IAEA inspectors are now carrying out verification at the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, and Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation engaged constructively to arrange safeguards equipment there. Grossi also said inspectors were withdrawn for safety reasons after military attacks began. Without this, a reader believes Iran is refusing the IAEA all access.

How we know

The resolution, submitted by Britain, France, Germany and the United States, marks the first time Iran has been referred to the Security Council in 20 years for failing to comply with its nuclear reporting obligations. The move has been seen as largely symbolic as China and Russia hold power to veto any sanctions against their ally Tehran. Both countries were joined by Niger in voting against the IAEA resolution. Iran's UN representative, Amir Saeid Iravani, called out the Security Council's "silence" regarding the US-Israeli strikes against his country.

"Today's meeting is an illustration of an established double standard in which the aggressor is shielded with impunity, the victim is placed under criticism, and the language of non-proliferation is cynically appropriated to advance geopolitical objectives," he said. Before the June 2025 strikes, the IAEA calculated that Iran possessed approximately 440 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent, which is close to the 90 percent needed to make a bomb and well above the 3.67-percent limit set by a 2015 now-defunct agreement with Iran.

Since June 2025, the fate of the stockpile has remained uncertain. US President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to renew strikes against Iran, possibly after the midterm elections next week. "Do I make a deal with them, or do I finish them off? That's my -- it's the only question. Do I make a deal, or do I finish them off?" he said in a Fox News interview on Sunday. pel/vla/des/pnb

Read the original article on al-monitor.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The article says the latest war simply erupted on February 28. Al-Monitor itself reported earlier in October that the war began with US-Israeli strikes on Iran. The article also puts the latest strikes on nuclear facilities in the passive, and it leaves out Grossi's remark that IAEA inspectors are working at Bushehr.

  1. Drops what it reported before

    Serious

    “the latest war, which erupted on February 28”

    Why this matters
    The word "erupted" presents the war as something that broke out on its own. Nothing in the sentence says who started it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the February war as a mutual outbreak of fighting with no side responsible for starting it.
    The context
    Al-Monitor reported on 13 October and 10 October that the war began with US-Israeli strikes on Iran. Here the outlet drops that and gives the only mention of US-Israeli strikes to Iran's envoy as his complaint.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Nuclear facilities have also been hit in the latest war, which began with US-Israeli strikes on February 28.

  2. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “Nuclear facilities have also been hit”

    Why this matters
    The words "have also been hit" put the strikes in the passive and name no one who carried them out.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left without an actor for the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in the current war.
    The context
    Al-Monitor's own earlier reporting says the war began with US-Israeli strikes, and the article names Israel and the US for the June 2025 strikes in the sentence before. The actor of the current strikes was known to the outlet.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article leaves out what Grossi told the Council in the same speech. IAEA inspectors are now carrying out verification at the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, and Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation engaged constructively to arrange safeguards equipment there. Grossi also said inspectors were withdrawn for safety reasons after military attacks began. Without this, a reader believes Iran is refusing the IAEA all access.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al-Monitor

  1. 27 OctHow wartime urgency pushed Iran to court Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan3.0
  2. 27 OctQatar says Iran needs to show good intentions for mediation efforts to succeed0.0
  3. 27 OctIranian strait authority says Sinokor vessels will face legal action3.0
  4. 27 OctIran security chief meets Supreme Leader after talks with Mecca pact countries0.0
  5. 26 OctSaudi Arabia’s KBS, top Turkish and Pakistani officials hold rare meeting in Iran: What to know3.0

Everything we scored from Al-Monitor