New York Post, on Gaza, 9 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Trump boosts statement calling Nobel Peace Prize winner Navi Pillay 'unabashed hater of America'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

WASHINGTON — President Trump re-posted a scathing statement Friday denouncing the choice of Navi Pillay, , for the prestigious annual Nobel Peace Prize . “Today the Nobel Committee shamed itself beyond repair and demeaned the once great Nobel Peace Prize by giving it to the UN’s Navi Pillay. Pillay is an unabashed hater of America and Israel,” the reposted statement from the Alabama and Georgia-based Schoen Law Firm said.

“ claiming to find that Israel committed genocide and urging prosecution. She has no credibility in any normal sphere and has never done a thing to foster peace. Just the opposite. But what could be expected from a committee that previously gave the once coveted peace prize to Yasser Arafat?” President Donald J. Trump speaks during an announcement on Trump Accounts in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Wednesday, October 7, 2026.

POOL via CNP/INSTARimages.com Trump had yet to comment in his own words on the selection — after saying for years that the panel should pick him for his role in mediating world conflicts. Pillay, a South Africa-born lawyer of Indian heritage, led the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory between 2021 and 2025. Explore More Neighbors of NJ murder-suicide family noticed small sign something was wrong at $1.7M home before killings Full texts between ‘Cornell 7’ Jane Doe, frat brother she later accused of rape revealed Multiple hospitalized after severe turbulence, 25K-foot drop forces NYC-bound flight to make emergency landing In September 2025, the panel assessed that Israel committed genocide .

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article omits that Israel refused to cooperate with the commission. It also omits that the commission found Israel's president, prime minister and former defence minister incited genocide. A reader judging the "phony investigation" charge has none of the commission's actual findings.

How we know

The Israeli foreign ministry ripped Pavi’s award, saying in a statement that “[Nazi propaganda chief] Joseph Goebbels is certainly applauding from hell.” South African lawyer Navi Pillay, right, holds flowers during a press conference at the International Nuremberg Principles Academy in Nuremberg, Germany, Friday, October 9, 2026. Pillay, a human rights defender and former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, was awarded the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize for her efforts to promote peace and international law.

DAVIDE ELIAS/EPA/Shutterstock “If there were an award for lies, hatred, and blood libels, Navi Pillay wouldn’t just be a contender. She’d be a frontrunner,” the ministry said. “Awarding Pillay the Nobel Peace Prize isn’t a recognition of justice. ”

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that Pillay has repeatedly rebuffed accusations of antisemitism and of ignoring the Hamas attacks. It also omits that praise poured in for the award, with Israel a rare dissenting voice. Without this a reader believes the award was met mainly by condemnation and that the charges against her stand unanswered.

How we know

Read the original article on nypost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The New York Post reports Trump reposting an attack on Navi Pillay's Nobel Peace Prize, and fills the piece with that statement and the Israeli foreign ministry's insults. It reduces the UN Commission of Inquiry's genocide finding to something Pillay personally "accused" Israel of, and calls Israel's genocide "the Gaza war against Hamas". It lets grave charges against Pillay stand unanswered, though other outlets reported her rebuttals and the wide praise for the award.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “a former United Nations official who accused Israel of genocide”

    Why this matters
    The words "accused Israel of genocide" turn a formal finding by a UN Commission of Inquiry into a personal accusation by one former official.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking genocide in Gaza is one woman's charge against Israel, not a documented finding.
    The context
    The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry, which Pillay chaired, found in September 2025 that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. The article itself later says the panel "assessed" this, but its opening sentence frames it as an accusation.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    President Trump reposted a statement denouncing the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Navi Pillay, who chaired the UN Commission of Inquiry that found in 2025 that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza.

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “In her position she celebrated terrorists and rewarded Hamas.”

    Why this matters
    The Post quotes the law firm's charge that Pillay "celebrated terrorists and rewarded Hamas" and never sets her answer or any fact against it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left thinking the claim that a Nobel laureate sided with terrorists is an open charge she has not answered.
    The context
    Pillay has repeatedly rebuffed critics who accused her of turning a blind eye to the Hamas attacks. The article gives no response from her.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “She conducted a phony ‘investigation’”

    Why this matters
    The phrase "phony ‘investigation’" casts doubt on the commission's work, and the Post adds nothing about what the commission found or how.
    The impression it gives
    A reader may think the inquiry was a sham with no real basis.
    The context
    The commission's 72-page report found reasonable grounds that Israel committed four of the five genocidal acts in the Genocide Convention. Israel refused to cooperate with the commission from the start.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “It’s the grotesque weaponization of an award to legitimize anti-Israel hatred and prejudice.”

    Why this matters
    The Post ends the article on the Israeli foreign ministry's charge of "hatred and prejudice", with nothing after it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader closes the piece with the charge of anti-Israel prejudice as the final word on Pillay and the prize.
    The context
    The Nobel Committee chose Pillay for her courage and integrity in advancing international law, and Israel was a rare dissenting voice as praise came in. None of this answers the closing charge.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The Israeli foreign ministry called the award an attempt to legitimise anti-Israel prejudice. Pillay has repeatedly rejected accusations of bias, and the Nobel Committee said it honoured her courage and integrity in advancing international law.

  3. Tells the event as something else

    Minor

    “during the Gaza war against Hamas”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Post describes the events the commission examined as "the Gaza war against Hamas".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the genocide finding to concern a war aimed at an armed group, Hamas.
    The context
    The commission found Israel responsible for genocide with a specific intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza. The Post's words point the reader at Hamas, while the finding concerns Palestinians as a people.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that Pillay has repeatedly rebuffed accusations of antisemitism and of ignoring the Hamas attacks. It also omits that praise poured in for the award, with Israel a rare dissenting voice. Without this a reader believes the award was met mainly by condemnation and that the charges against her stand unanswered.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article omits that Israel refused to cooperate with the commission. It also omits that the commission found Israel's president, prime minister and former defence minister incited genocide. A reader judging the "phony investigation" charge has none of the commission's actual findings.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from New York Post

Everything we scored from New York Post