The Guardian, on UK Politics, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

The UK’s policy on datacentres and AI was developed without any meetings with environmental groups, an investigation has found. The nonprofit organisation Spotlight on Corruption said a “considerable revolving door” shaped the government’s development of “AI growth zones”, a central plank of the former prime minister Keir Starmer’s AI and economic policy, with 38 ministers, senior civil servants and special advisers hired to positions in AI companies between July 2024 and September 2026.

Meanwhile, even as top officials left government for jobs at OpenAI and Anthropic, . Kamila Kingstone, a campaign lead at the NGO, said: “The government totally failed at the most senior level to speak to environmental NGOs or community groups when developing its flagship policy on AI datacentres. This is despite the serious environmental implications of its plans.”

Over 12 months, Spotlight on Corruption filed 40 freedom of information requests to 18 government agencies, seeking details of meetings and investment figures relating to the government’s policymaking on the growth zones, covering the period between July 2024 and June 2026. The investigation found that ministers, permanent secretaries and directors general involved in developing the policy met 137 businesses – some several times – to discuss Britain’s datacentre policy.

By contrast, senior officials met only two community groups and no environmental organisations. View image in fullscreen Approval has been given for a £500m redevelopment of the Truman Brewery site in Brick Lane, east London, to include a datacentre. Photograph: David Levene/The Guardian Of the 38 senior officials who left government, nine were from the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, which has played a central role in shaping Britain’s AI strategy.

These included a former minister for AI and intellectual property, a former AI adviser to the prime minister, a former director of AI opportunities, a deputy director of AI international policy and a head of AI engineering. AI growth zones were a groundbreaking policy under which the government promised to “ turbocharge the economy” and create jobs by building massive datacentres across five regions – in Starmer’s words, “mainlining AI into the veins” of the country.

The policy aimed to pave the way for Britain to build big datacentres, some of them larger than any datacentre that has been built in the country so far. These developments, often partnered with US tech companies, would supposedly bring in thousands of jobs. Investigations by the Guardian have called the policy into question, suggesting that it rests on assumptions that do not hold up, financial figures that were not audited and exaggerated projections for job creation.

In particular, the Guardian has shown there is little realism behind announced plans to power these developments, and claims that they will use purpose-built renewables. In fact, different government departments appear to diverge on how much electricity the UK’s datacentre plans will actually require – and what their environmental cost will therefore be. Meanwhile, there has been growing opposition to datacentres in Britain, with campaign groups protesting against planned developments in places ranging from Auchtertool , a rural village north of Edinburgh, to Brick Lane in east London.

View image in fullscreen Fourteen local campaigns rallied in September at Holyrood against datacentres planned in Scotland. Photograph: Murdo MacLeod/The Guardian Chi Onwurah, the MP for Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West, said the growing backlash – and the far larger opposition in the US – was a warning that the government needed to seek greater community input. skip past newsletter promotion Free newsletter | Every day Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day’s headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning Enter your email Sign up after newsletter promotion “It is critically important that AI benefits communities and is also shaped by them,” she said.

“I’ve been concerned about what we’ve seen in the US, where there’s a strong feeling that datacentres are being imposed without adequate consultation. We can see the backlash influencing the midterms. It’s really important that communities are involved in datacentres and AI growth zones and see the benefits.” Spotlight on Corruption’s investigation suggests that previous policy was largely shaped by conversations with business, and that the government “failed to take the environmental and social impacts [of datacentres] seriously”.

While the government met a handful of civil society groups, these meetings were “held a few days before the launch of the policy, meaning they had no meaningful input”, according to the report. Finally, many further meetings between businesses and Starmer’s administration would not have been disclosed, said Spotlight on Corruption. This is largely because Starmer’s policy was led by a special adviser, Jade Leung, whose role was subject to far less stringent transparency requirements.

Spotlight on Corruption also looked at how other countries – including Canada, Germany and Australia – developed policy. It found these countries consulted far more widely on introducing datacentres and had more stringent environmental criteria. It said the UK had “fallen behind equivalent jurisdictions” in developing an equitable strategy. A government spokesperson said: “We are clear that datacentres should create British jobs, strengthen supply chains and deliver benefits for the communities that host them, while prioritising clean power and using water responsibly – and meet with these companies to make sure that happens.

We want to work closely with industry, local authorities, environmental groups and communities, and welcome opportunities to hear their views. “For most proposed datacentre developments, community benefits are considered through the relevant local planning processes. We have already announced measures which will enable local authorities hosting datacentres in AI growth zones in England to keep all the additional business rates they generate.”

Explore more on these topics Datacentres - UK Planning policy AI (artificial intelligence) Computing Freedom of information news Share Reuse this content

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Guardian reports a Spotlight on Corruption investigation, based on freedom of information requests, which found that senior officials met 137 businesses and no environmental groups while developing AI growth zones. The body is careful to attribute and to set out the method, and it gives the government a full reply. The headline drops both the attribution and the body's limit to senior officials, and one sentence states the NGO's finding of a failure to engage in the outlet's own voice.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “UK government met 137 businesses over AI datacentres – but no environmental groups”

    Why this matters
    The headline states as the Guardian's own fact that the government met 137 businesses and no environmental groups. It names no source and sets no limit on which officials are meant.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the whole government had no contact with any environmental group, and that this is established fact rather than one NGO's finding.
    The context
    The body credits the count to Spotlight on Corruption's investigation and limits it to ministers, permanent secretaries and directors general. It also reports that the government met a handful of civil society groups a few days before the launch.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“ministers, permanent secretaries and directors general involved in developing the policy met 137 businesses”
    • Elsewhere in the article“senior officials met only two community groups and no environmental organisations”
    • Elsewhere in the article“While the government met a handful of civil society groups”

    Show it in the article

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “government departments largely failed to engage meaningfully with stakeholders outside the technology industry”

    Why this matters
    The Guardian writes in its own voice that departments failed to engage meaningfully. This is the verdict of Spotlight on Corruption and its campaign lead, and the sentence gives no attribution. Placing it beside the revolving door also suggests the two are linked.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the failure to engage meaningfully as settled fact and assumes it follows from officials leaving for AI firms.
    The context
    The judgement that the engagement was not meaningful belongs to the NGO, and the article quotes the NGO saying so in the next sentences. The government spokesperson says it wants to work with environmental groups and communities. The article shows no causal link between departures and the pattern of meetings.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The government totally failed at the most senior level”
    • Elsewhere in the article“We want to work closely with industry, local authorities, environmental groups and communities”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Spotlight on Corruption filed 40 freedom of information requests to 18 government agencies”

    It tells the reader how the figures were gathered and over what period, so the counts can be judged on their basis.

  • “according to the report”

    It attributes the claim that civil society meetings came too late to have any input to the report, not to the paper.

  • “A government spokesperson said:”

    It gives the government a full right of reply across four sentences, setting out its stated aims and the business rates measure.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 27 OctWhy won’t MPs tax the rich? We asked them – and their answers gave us hope0.0
  2. 27 OctUK officials discussing options including free movement with EU ahead of summit3.0
  3. 27 Oct‘We want a full apology for slavery’: Commonwealth at a crossroads as king heads to the Caribbean3.0
  4. 27 OctTwo men charged over alleged plot to assist Iran after RAF Fairford incident3.0
  5. 26 OctIf the PM reboots the UK for working-class people, unions will be with him. But the time for talking is over0.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian