LBC, on UK Politics, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Two men charged with national security offences over RAF Fairford incident

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Counter Terrorism Policing (CTP) said Mohmed Abdulkarim, 24, of London, will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court today charged with assisting a foreign intelligence service under the National Security Act 2023. He will appear alongside Nouman Essghir, 24, also of London, who is charged with entering a prohibited place for a purpose prejudicial to the UK after initially being arrested at the scene near the Gloucestershire base on September 27 and then re-arrested on October 20.

CTP said they believe the foreign intelligence service involved in the case is Iran. Read more: Counter-terror police given more time to question two men accused of assisting Iran amid RAF Fairford probe Read more: 'Highly likely' that Iran was behind the RAF Fairford 'terror plot', Burnham says as US joins UK and 20 others in condemning attacks Assistant Commissioner Laurence Taylor, head of national counter terrorism policing in the UK, said: “We have seen a range of incidents in recent months that we believe have been directed by the Iranian state, and as the director general of MI5 said just the other week, we are working together to intervene, identify and respond to that threat.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

LBC carries the police belief that Iran directed recent incidents, and links to Burnham's claim that Iran was 'highly likely' behind Fairford. It never reports that Tehran's ambassador to Britain has denied it. A reader is left thinking the Iran link goes unanswered.

How we know

“The public can help us with this, and as always I would urge them to report anything that they’re worried about – those reports can and do make a difference.” A 25-year-old dual UK/Iranian national, who was also arrested on October 20 on suspicion of aiding Iran’s intelligence service, has been released without charge but remains on police bail after being arrested on October 1 on suspicion of preparation of terrorist acts. Five other men arrested during the investigation remain on police bail.

Frank Ferguson, chief Crown prosecutor for the CPS special crime and counter terrorism division, said: “The Crown Prosecution Service has decided to prosecute two individuals with National Security Act offences following a Counter Terrorism Policing investigation into a high-profile incident involving RAF Fairford. “We will continue to work closely with our partners as this complex investigation continues.”

Read the original article on lbc.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

LBC puts 'linked to Iran' in quotation marks in its headline, though nobody in the article says those words. Its opening sentence attaches the Iran link to both men, when police tied Iran to the intelligence service in Abdulkarim's charge. LBC also never reports that Iran's ambassador to Britain has denied that Iran was behind the incident.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “'linked to Iran'”

    Why this matters
    LBC puts 'linked to Iran' in quotation marks and attaches it to both men and to the incident as a whole.
    The impression it gives
    That someone has said, in those words, that both men and the Fairford incident are linked to Iran.
    The context
    Nobody in the article says 'linked to Iran'. Police said only that the foreign intelligence service in Abdulkarim's charge is believed to be Iran. Other outlets report that only one man is suspected of assisting Iran.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Makes a false claim

    Minor

    “Two men charged with national security offences following a suspected terror plot near RAF Fairford are believed to have links to Iran, police say.”

    Why this matters
    LBC opens by saying police believe both charged men have links to Iran.
    The impression it gives
    That police have tied both Abdulkarim and Essghir to the Iranian state.
    The context
    LBC's own next sentences give two different charges. Only Abdulkarim is charged with assisting a foreign intelligence service. Essghir is charged with entering a prohibited place. Reuters and the Daily Mail both report that prosecutors accuse one of the two of helping Iranian intelligence.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    LBC carries the police belief that Iran directed recent incidents, and links to Burnham's claim that Iran was 'highly likely' behind Fairford. It never reports that Tehran's ambassador to Britain has denied it. A reader is left thinking the Iran link goes unanswered.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from LBC

  1. 28 OctChancellor scraps standing charges on gas bills as he vows to 'back entrepreneurs' in first Budget3.0
  2. 27 OctCarer's Allowance to be abolished, says Business Secretary - but admits 'fairer' tapered system 'won't be fully operational until 2030'6.0
  3. 27 OctNazi salutes and WhatsApp abuse: Jewish students vow to fight antisemitism as cases on campus 'significantly higher' after October 73.0
  4. 27 OctAndy Burnham must prove Britain can fund its public services without abandoning the world’s poorest0.0
  5. 27 OctThe economy will not improve at home until Britain gets better at selling abroad0.0

Everything we scored from LBC