BBC News, on Iran, 12 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Britain won't tolerate threats on our soil, Miliband says as he summons Iran ambassador

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

- Published

The foreign secretary has summoned the Iranian ambassador to make clear that "Britain will not tolerate threats on our soil" following last month's incident at RAF Fairford.

Ed Miliband said Iran's "continued attempts" to undermine the UK's security "through its criminal networks, proxy groups and state-backed malign activity is unacceptable".

Prime Minister Andy Burnham told MPs on Monday that the incident at the airbase in Gloucestershire was "almost certainly directed by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard".

Iran's ambassador to the UK, Seyed Ali Mousavi, said Tehran was not involved and was willing to cooperate with British authorities.

The Foreign Office has also sanctioned two Iranians, including the head of - with both men subjected to travel bans and asset freezes.

Burnham also indicated Iran could be hit with further sanctions over its suspected role.

It comes as the UK and 28 other countries - including the US, Canada, Australia, France and Germany - issued a joint statement condemning "in the strongest terms" violent attacks by Iran.

The statement accuses Tehran of carrying out "lethal plotting, arson, sabotage, cyber-attacks, and other hybrid activities" and also recognises the UK's attribution of Iranian involvement in the incident at RAF Fairford.

A huge police operation began after officers were alerted to three suspicious vehicles near the base in the early hours of 27 September.

Dozens of homes were evacuated in the nearby village of Whelford and a large cordon was put in place around the site.

So far, a total of seven men - all in their 20s - have been arrested and later bailed in connection with the incident. No one has been charged.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that police found no explosive materials in the three vans, only a quantity of petrol. It reports the ministers' language about threats and violent attacks. Without this fact a reader may picture a foiled bomb attack, when other outlets described an ambiguous episode.

How we know

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is expected to provide an update on the incident in the Commons later.

Last week, Downing Street insisted the airbase was safe after the US withdrew all of its bombers – about a dozen B-1s from the base – back to their home stations on American soil.

In July, Iran said "any base used for aggression against Iranian territory constitutes a legitimate target for our forces".

RAF Fairford, in the Cotswolds, has been used as a forward operating location by the US air force for decades.

In recent months, the US has flown B-1 and B-52 bombers from the base for the Middle East, after the UK approved an American request to use it for .

Read the original article on bbc.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The BBC reports the UK's attribution of the RAF Fairford incident to Iran's Revolutionary Guard, gives Iran's denial, and notes that no one has been charged. In its own voice it calls the US bombing raids flown from Fairford "defensive strikes on Iran", taking the British and US description of those raids as fact. It also calls Iran's government "the regime" and never says that police found no explosives in the vans.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “defensive strikes on Iran”

    Why this matters
    The BBC uses the word "defensive" in its own narration for US bombing raids on Iran flown from RAF Fairford. There is no attribution to the UK or US government.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established fact that the US strikes on Iran were defensive, and that Iran's warning about the base was a threat against a purely defensive operation.
    The context
    Calling the strikes defensive is the UK and US position. Iran calls them aggression, as the article itself shows in S15, and other coverage simply describes the base as one used to attack Iran. The label belongs to the government that approved the request, not to the BBC.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    In recent months, the US has flown B-1 and B-52 bombers from the base to strike Iran, after the UK approved an American request to use it for what the government called defensive strikes.

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the regime's counterespionage operations”

    Why this matters
    The BBC calls Iran's government "the regime" in its own narration. It also states the sanctioned man's role as fact rather than as the British government's description of him.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes in a verdict on the Iranian government through the word "regime", and takes the man's post as confirmed.
    The context
    "Regime" is a loaded term when nobody in the article is quoted using it. The post is the Foreign Office's description of the man.

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that police found no explosive materials in the three vans, only a quantity of petrol. It reports the ministers' language about threats and violent attacks. Without this fact a reader may picture a foiled bomb attack, when other outlets described an ambiguous episode.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from BBC News

Everything we scored from BBC News

See how 126 outlets covered this story