The Jewish Chronicle, on UK Politics, 5 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Sheffield Labour defies orders to break Green coalition over Zionism is racism motion

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Sheffield Labour has defied orders from the national party to break its coalition with the Greens over the “Zionism is racism” motion. The Labour group has vowed to continue its power-sharing agreement despite Sheffield Greens failing to publicly renounce the notorious motion passed at Zack Polanski’s party conference last month. The decision – a U-turn from the Labour group’s previous position – sets up a potential rift with Labour’s ruling National Executive Committee (NEC), which ordered 11 Labour council groups, including Sheffield, to end power-sharing deals unless local Greens disavowed the motion.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says what the motion actually states. It does not mention that the motion describes Zionism as an ideology supporting an ethnonationalist Jewish state in historic Palestine, or that it backs a single Palestinian state. Without this, a reader knows the motion only through the words notorious and antisemitic.

How we know

Sheffield Labour will now have to seek permission from the NEC to continue the power sharing agreement. The JC understands that Jewish leaders have made representations to Sheffield Labour about the volte face. After a council meeting on Wednesday evening, Labour council leader Fran Belbin said “there is now a basis on which Labour and the Greens can continue to work together in Sheffield.” Belbin said the local Labour group was “content that the Sheffield Greens have distanced themselves from the most divisive elements of their party conference motion which was causing such concern to our communities, most notably our Jewish residents.”

According to Belbin, Sheffield Greens have confirmed “Zionism is not inherently racist” and have stated “that they believe in self determination for all peoples”. But the Green group has not publicly disavowed the motion. The local group had previously accused Labour of “throwing away our joint working agreement because of top down demands from London”. Echoing the language of the motion, it also said: “We will continue to speak up for Palestinians and against Labour’s complicity in the genocide.”

Belbin, who had described the decision over the coalition as one that “has been the hardest since I became Leader of the Council” now says Sheffield Greens had “addressed some of the things we have been asking for”. She said a joint statement setting out how the two parties would continue governing Sheffield is expected "in coming days". The decision appears to fly in the face of a national Labour ultimatum issued from Andy Burnham after the Green Party passed the motion.

The Prime Minister told MPs in October that Labour would not partner with Polanski’s party over the "antisemitic" policy and a party order followed demanding that local Green groups disown the motion or lose their coalition deals with Labour groups. Supporters of the “Zionism is racism” motion have now claimed victory in Sheffield, with saying “Sheffield Labour capitulates. Greens didn’t give an inch.” Sheffield Labour, which relies on the Green Party’s 20 seats to bolsters its 25 in the 84-seat council, will now have to convince the NEC that its agreement with the Greens can continue.

Defra Secretary and former NEC member Dame Angela Eagle said on Thursday that the ruling executive has “made it quite clear to local Labour groups that in the aftermath of the motion on Zionism at Green Party conference that we cannot be in coalition with Green groups that don’t repudiate the awful implications of the motion that they passed. “What happens in Sheffield will be a matter for both the party chair and the NEC to decide and I hope that the Labour group in Sheffield will bear that in mind as they make their decision.”

Commenting on the announcement by Belbin, councillor Martin Smith, leader of the Liberal Democrat Group, accused the Labour group’s “extraordinary U-turn” of being a “shameful abandonment of principle”. Smith said: "Just days ago, Labour were telling us that trust with the Greens was completely broken and that they could no longer work together. Now they've decided to carry on as if nothing happened."

Read the original article on thejc.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Jewish Chronicle calls Ashok Kumar an anti-Israel activist in its own voice, and nothing in the article backs the label. It also never tells readers what the Zionism is racism motion says, so they know it only through words like notorious and antisemitic.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “anti-Israel activist Ashok Kumar”

    Why this matters
    The outlet labels a named supporter of the motion an anti-Israel activist in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is told to see Kumar as hostile to Israel as such, which colours his comment.
    The context
    Nothing in the article backs the label. The only words quoted from him are about Sheffield Labour and the Greens.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Greens didn’t give an inch.”

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says what the motion actually states. It does not mention that the motion describes Zionism as an ideology supporting an ethnonationalist Jewish state in historic Palestine, or that it backs a single Palestinian state. Without this, a reader knows the motion only through the words notorious and antisemitic.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jewish Chronicle

  1. 5 NovSupreme Court defers verdict on Palestine Action ban appeal0.0
  2. 5 NovMet settles claim by pro-Palestine activist over terror arrest6.0
  3. 5 NovHatzola, Shomrim, and CST honoured by Barnet Council for exceptional service to borough0.0
  4. 5 NovExclusive: Council to return £120k to Jewish safety after JC reveals plan to spend on ‘street art’3.0
  5. 5 NovAntisemitic harassment claims by Jewish BBC staff demand independent inquiry0.0

Everything we scored from The Jewish Chronicle