Daily Express, on UK Politics, 8 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Are you happy to pay more taxes to increase UK defence spending? Have your say

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Are you happy to pay more taxes to increase UK defence spending? Have your say Would you be willing to pay more tax to increase UK defence spending? Have your say in our poll below. Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments POLL By Lauran O'Toole , Senior Reporter 06:30, Sun, Nov 8, 2026 Healey could be forced to raise taxes to fund an increase in UK defence spending (Image: Getty) John Healey may be forced to hike taxes as pressure mounts on the Chancellor to increase defence spending.

Healy quit as defence secretary under Keir Starmer’s government back in June over a long-delayed military spending ban. In a scathing resignation letter, he said the then prime minister had been "unable" and the Treasury "unwilling" to "commit the resources that the nation needs to defend the country at this time of rising threats". However, the now-Chancellor failed to outline a clear plan for meeting the UK’s target of spending 3% of GDP on defence by 2030 and defence Secretary Wes Streeting denied "kicking the can down the road" on defence spending.

Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT Instead, Healey said he will hold off until next year’s spending review before presenting a plan to meet Labour’s pledge of devoting 3.5% of GDP to defence by 2035. A new report by the Resolution Foundation, Thin End of the Wedge, warns that he would struggle to raise the £28bn a year needed to fulfil the pledge without increasing taxes on average workers. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch criticised the Chancellor’s proposal to review the issue next year, describing it as a “plan to have a plan”.

She said: “He should have set out a plan for 3% today. So now he is the man who is increasing risk to personnel on operations, , he has failed his own test. Get the day's biggest headlines in UK and World news and more I would like to receive emails from the Daily Express featuring our latest products, services, offers, and promotions from across the Reach Plc family . Subscribe Invalid email You agree you are 18 or over.

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info . Would you be willing to pay more tax to increase UK defence spending? Have your say in our poll below: Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT Police issue major update as boy, 3, fighting for life after horror nursery emergency Boy, 3, fighting for life after horror emergency at UK nursery | UK | News | Express.co.uk “This is on him and no-one will ever forget.

If he had any decency he would resign again today. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT “What he’s done is he’s given himself a bit of breathing space until next year. Instead what we have is a plan to have a plan. I bet Putin’s really scared now.” NATO members have agreed to spend 3.5% of GDP on core defence, with an additional 1.5% on broader defence and security-related investments such as protection of key infrastructure and resilience.

NATO Defence Taxes John Healey Polls Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments

Read the original article on express.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Daily Express runs a reader poll on paying more tax for defence. It hangs the poll on Chancellor John Healey's decision to delay a defence spending plan, and it attributes the main claims to named sources. The one weakness is space: Kemi Badenoch's attack fills most of the body, and Labour's side gets a single clause and a paraphrase.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “he is the man who is making our country less safe”

    Why this matters
    The Express quotes Kemi Badenoch at length across S10 to S12 and S19 to S23. Her charge that Healey is "making our country less safe" and "increasing risk to personnel on operations" runs in full.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away with the Conservative leader's verdict on the decision as the main account of what it means for national security.
    The context
    The government's side appears only as a short clause saying Wes Streeting denied delaying, and a paraphrase of Healey's timetable. Nobody from the Treasury or the government answers the specific charge about risk to personnel or national safety.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“defence Secretary Wes Streeting denied”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Healey said he will hold off until next year’s spending review”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “A new report by the Resolution Foundation, Thin End of the Wedge, warns”

    The Express names the source and the report behind the £28bn figure and the tax warning, and does not state them in its own voice.

  • “Tory leader Kemi Badenoch criticised the Chancellor’s proposal to review the issue next year, describing it as a “plan to have a plan”.”

    The Express attributes the political attack to the named politician who made it, and does not adopt her verdict as its own.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Express

  1. 8 NovThree DWP State Pension changes hitting bank accounts after the Budget3.0
  2. 8 NovBrits with high blood pressure can qualify for £194.60 weekly payment from DWP3.0
  3. 8 NovAndy Burnham’s new £390 car tax rule change - starts in April 20277.3
  4. 8 NovState pensioners living alone handed boosted £247 from DWP6.0
  5. 8 NovHMRC April 2027 rule change 'could leave families with more tax than money'3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Express