Daily Star, on UK Politics, 26 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Andy Burnham brings in major new parking rule – here's how

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Fresh parking regulations introduced under Andy Burnham have come under fire. The Labour Party government confirmed last week that drivers will be guaranteed five minutes to decide whether to park, and 10 minutes to vacate after their parking session concludes, before facing a penalty charge under the new legislation. The prime minister announced that a new official code of practice for the industry would grant motorists in England, Scotland and Wales a host of new rights.

However, consumer watchdog Which? argued the "long overdue" regulations appeared to fall well short of what was required to help drivers fight back against private parking "cowboys". Meanwhile, campaign group IAM RoadSmart insisted more could be done for drivers, with two key updates topping their wishlist, reports Birmingham Live . Director of Policy, Nicholas Lyes said: "It is welcome to see new protections put in place for drivers through a single code of practice; however, we would have liked to see a single appeals system and action against debt recovery organisations as part of the package.

"Ultimately, we need to get to a place where parking on private land is a seamless, straightforward, and clear process, not one fraught with potential traps which leaves drivers unfairly out of pocket." Which? also criticised the government for sidestepping an independent appeals body "that could rein in the industry's worst practices" and failing to tackle private parking debt recovery fees, which it claimed were routinely added without drivers' knowledge, pushing already unjust charges even higher.

RAC head of policy Simon Williams commented: "This a step in the right direction to protect drivers from the poor practices of some private parking companies but not the leap we've been campaigning for for so long. "We've long called for the banning of debt recovery fees being added on top of parking charge notices (PCNs) and a single independent appeals body to replace the two industry-run ones, but neither have been included which is disappointing."

The Government has also announced measures to tackle second-hand car dealers who alter mileage clocks. While selling a "clocked car" is already illegal under fraud laws, adding it to an official list of prohibited practices will make it easier for enforcement bodies to intervene. Greg Smith, a shadow transport minister, said: “Andy Burnham posing as the driver’s friend is a joke. This is the same Labour Government that is doubling parking fines right across England.

Five minutes’ grace in a supermarket car park will not fool anyone.

Read the original article on dailystar.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Daily Star reports the government's new private parking code of practice, with grace periods for drivers, and gives space to Which?, IAM RoadSmart, the RAC and a Conservative shadow minister. The body is mostly attributed and fair. The headline claims the rule affects everyone when the article describes protections for drivers using private car parks.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “impacting everyone”

    Why this matters
    The words "impacting everyone" tell the reader the new rule reaches the whole population.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes every person in Britain is affected by a sweeping new parking rule.
    The context
    The body describes a code of practice for the private parking industry that gives drivers grace periods before a penalty. It applies to motorists who use private car parks, not to everyone.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“drivers will be guaranteed five minutes to decide whether to park”
    • Elsewhere in the article“parking on private land is a seamless, straightforward, and clear process”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “which it claimed were routinely added without drivers' knowledge”

    The Daily Star attributes the claim about hidden debt recovery fees to Which? rather than stating it in its own voice.

  • “consumer watchdog Which? argued the "long overdue" regulations appeared to fall well short”

    The criticism and the loaded word "cowboys" are attributed to Which?, kept in quotation marks and not adopted as the outlet's own description.

  • “Greg Smith, a shadow transport minister, said”

    The opposition attack on Burnham is clearly attributed to a named Conservative politician, not stated as the outlet's own view.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Star

  1. 26 OctUK conscription age limit raised as WW3 fears rise and Brits told to 'make sacrifices'6.0
  2. 26 OctAndy Burnham's DWP confirms these 5 groups won't receive Winter Fuel Payment0.0
  3. 26 OctAndy Burnham introduces town centre bans and curfews for one group of people3.0
  4. 26 OctWetherspoon's 'poppy ban' explained as army 'political' veteran refused entry0.0
  5. 26 OctAndy Burnham breaks silence on whether a general election will be called 'soon'0.0

Everything we scored from Daily Star