The New York Times, on Iran, 25 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

A New Level of Threat and Fear Risks Pushing the U.S. and Iran Back to Full War

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Inside the Trump administration, officials are expressing fears that Iran is in the “advanced stages” of planning attacks against U.S. officials. More than 6,000 miles away, , a final push to force Iran to surrender to U.S. demands. The conflict in the Middle East has entered a new phase in which a maelstrom of factors, from the political calendars in the United States and Israel to the potential for all sides to be seeking pretexts for action, are creating heightened levels of tension and risk.

This is how countries can escalate into full-scale war, several diplomats and outside experts noted. If the U.S. intelligence disclosed this week is right that Iran has credible plans to attack Americans at home and abroad, one senior European official said — “and it probably is,” the official added — one gunshot that appears aimed at a U.S. official could touch off a conflagration. So could a stray explosion near a bunker sheltering Iranian leaders , who already on Feb. 28.

The fact that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel and President Trump are facing critical elections that could dramatically affect the balance of power in their countries feeds into the complex set of calculations that all sides are making. Even if he is defeated on Tuesday, Mr. Netanyahu could decide to launch one last strike that he may believe his successor would hesitate to execute. Similarly, Mr. Trump, who knows how unpopular the war is even among his strongest supporters, may want to show that at least when it comes to his powers as commander in chief, his authority is undiminished.

And, as in other moments of global peril — the Cuban Missile Crisis and the decision to invade in Iraq, as examples — partial or faulty intelligence, or just a failure to understand the adversary’s true motives, can carry deadly consequences. Iraq poses another cautionary tale, when selective intelligence can be used as an actual pretext for military action. U.S. officials say they are focused on elements of the most recent intelligence suggesting that the Iranians may seek to kill U.S. ambassadors in the Middle East and American officials on U.S. soil — .

But history suggests Iran’s desires often outstrip its capabilities. It has at times hired hapless hit men who have been arrested before they could do harm. We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Times casts Iran's fear of a renewed attack as something Iranians merely 'appear convinced' of, though its own reporting days earlier said U.S. and Israeli militaries had drawn up specific strike plans. It writes the killing of Iran's former leaders as 'deaths in a decapitation strike' with no one named as the attacker. It also states U.S. intelligence's account of an Iranian unit's operations in its own voice.

  1. Hides who did it

    Serious

    “survived their predecessors’ deaths in a decapitation strike in the opening hours of the war”

    Why this matters
    The phrase gives Iran's former leaders 'deaths' rather than a killing, and 'a decapitation strike' has no attacker in the sentence.
    The impression it gives
    A reader learns that Iran's previous leaders died in a strike but is not told in this sentence who killed them.
    The context
    The Times reported that the opening phase of the war was a campaign of U.S.-Israeli strikes beginning in February, so the actor of the decapitation strike was known to the outlet.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    So could a stray explosion near a bunker sheltering Iran's current leaders, whose predecessors were killed in a U.S.-Israeli decapitation strike in the opening hours of the war on Feb. 28.

  2. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    “the Iranians appear convinced that Israel and the United States are preparing to unleash their third major attack in 16 months”

    Why this matters
    The words 'appear convinced' present the coming U.S.-Israeli attack as an Iranian belief, set against U.S. officials' fears in S1, which the article treats as probably right in S5.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking Iran's expectation of a new attack is a perception, possibly a mistaken one, while U.S. fears of Iranian plots rest on intelligence.
    The context
    Four days earlier the Times itself reported that the U.S. and Israeli militaries had developed specific plans for renewed strikes after the midterms, and that Pete Hegseth met Netanyahu to discuss them. The article drops that reporting and leaves the Iranian view looking like suspicion.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “a longtime ambition of Iran’s elite Unit 840 , which has carried out kidnappings and assassinations around the globe”

    Why this matters
    After attributing the latest intelligence to U.S. officials, the sentence switches to the outlet's own voice to state the unit's ambition and its record of kidnappings and assassinations.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the unit's global record of kidnappings and assassinations as established fact rather than as the account of U.S. or Western intelligence.
    The context
    The article gives no source for this record; the only sources in the sentence are U.S. officials, a party to the confrontation.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

  1. 28 OctIran War Cost Rises to $47.1 Billion, Pentagon Told Lawmakers3.0
  2. 26 OctNetanyahu Pushed for Attack on Iran Ahead of Israeli Election, Officials Say3.0
  3. 26 OctFlurry of Diplomacy in Iran Amid Reports of U.S. and Israeli Plans to Renew War0.0
  4. 25 OctIranians Face Anxious Wait as Threat of Attack Looms0.0
  5. 24 OctIran in ‘Advanced Stages’ of Planning Attacks Against Americans, Officials Say3.0

Everything we scored from The New York Times