Al-Monitor, on West Bank, 24 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

in Hebron as Israel begins military operation

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

JERUSALEM, Oct 24 (Reuters) - The Israeli military forced around 1,200 Palestinians to leave their homes in Hebron in the occupied West Bank, a Palestinian official said on Saturday, a day after a Palestinian attack killed two Israeli soldiers. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday had said after the soldiers were killed when when two Palestinian gunmenopened fire at a military checkpoint near the city.

The Israeli military said the gunmen were shot dead. They also said the operation in the Al-Jaladah and Ein Deir Baha neighbourhoods near the military checkpoint at the entrance of Hebron was to search for militants and weapons. In a statement, it also said the military would carry out demolitions. The Palestinian Authority criticised the operation as a "collective punishment". Yousef Zouhair Al-Jabari, the head of Hebron's municipality, said around 1,300 faced losing their homes in addition to the 1,200 already displaced.

He also said the Israeli operations were motivated by parliamentary elections on Tuesday when Netanyahu's right-wing coalition may lose his majority, opinion polls show. "Netanyahu and the radical ministers in his government are trying to win as many votes as possible from the settlers," Al-Jabari said. The non-governmental organisation the Palestinian Prisoners' Club said Israeli forces had arrested around 70 Palestinians on Friday and Saturday.

Israeli officials have not commented on any arrests. NETANYAHU'S GOVERNMENT HAS PRESIDED OVER EXPANSION OF SETTLEMENTS Al-Jabari said the military had demolished shops, factories, homes, and roads in Hebron and that the response was disproportionate and unjustified. Residents in Hebron told Reuters that the military expelled many people with no connection to the Palestinian attackers. "We are calling on officials to stand by us because we are not involved in any of this.

There are children. We are isolated; we don’t do anything. This is all arbitrary,” said Majdi Nasser, one of those driven from his home. Residents told Reuters they saw Israeli soldiers marking homes with a black X after their Palestinian occupants had been forced to leave. It was not immediately clear what the X mark meant. Netanyahu's government has presided over a rapid expansion of settlements, deemed illegal by UN bodies and ​most countries, .

Across the West Bank, Israel has blocked the entrances to most Palestinian cities and towns, severely curtailing Palestinians' freedom of movement. Yousef Mur, a resident of the Palestinian town of Yatta, said the closures meant he was unable to reach Jerusalem with his daughter for her cancer treatment. "The situation is bad, and we are suffering. When we tried to cross, they fired stun grenades towards us, and my girl got scared on the way.

They fired stun grenades towards people. The situation is very difficult," Mur said. (Reporting by Pesha Magid and Mussa Qawasma; editing by Barbara Lewis)

Read the original article on al-monitor.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Al-Monitor's Reuters report names the Israeli military as the force driving Palestinians from their homes in Hebron and gives residents and the mayor real space. It drops its own report from the day before that Netanyahu said the military would force Palestinians out of a Hebron neighbourhood, and gives the army's search for militants and weapons as the operation's aim. It also writes the settlements as deemed illegal by UN bodies and disputed by Israel, rather than as illegal under the ICJ's ruling.

  1. Drops what it reported before

    Serious

    “the military would launch a large-scale operation”

    Why this matters
    The article reduces what Netanyahu said on Friday to a plan to launch a large-scale operation. In S4 it then gives the military's stated aim, a search for militants and weapons, as the purpose.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the expulsions are a side effect of a search operation after the shooting.
    The context
    The outlet's own report the day before said Netanyahu stated the military would force Palestinians out of a Hebron neighbourhood, and compared it to the 2025 refugee camp assaults that displaced tens of thousands. B'Tselem reported that Netanyahu and Katz announced plans to forcibly displace residents.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Netanyahu had said on Friday that the military would force Palestinians out of a Hebron neighbourhood, likening it to the 2025 assaults on two refugee camps that displaced tens of thousands. The military said the operation was to search for militants and weapons.

  2. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “though Israel disputes this”

    Why this matters
    Al-Monitor writes the settlements as merely deemed illegal by UN bodies and most countries. It then closes the sentence with Israel's dispute.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the illegality of the settlements is an open question with two sides, one of them Israel.
    The context
    The International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found the settlements illegal under international law. Their legal status is settled, not a matter of opinion awaiting Israel's agreement.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Netanyahu's government has presided over a rapid expansion of settlements, which the International Court of Justice ruled illegal under international law in 2024.

  3. Headline softens an expulsion to displacement

    Minor

    “Around 1,200 Palestinians are displaced”

    Why this matters
    The headline uses the passive "are displaced" for people the body says the military forced out and expelled.
    The impression it gives
    A reader of the headline alone may take the displacement as a loose consequence of the operation.
    The context
    The body says the military forced the residents to leave, and residents say soldiers expelled people and marked their homes.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The Israeli military forced around 1,200 Palestinians to leave their homes”
    • Elsewhere in the article“the military expelled many people with no connection”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al-Monitor

Everything we scored from Al-Monitor