Press TV, on Iran, 26 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Tehran quadrilateral meeting fruit of Iranian nation’s resistance and Armed Forces’ valor: Bagheri Kani

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

A senior Iranian security official has described Monday’s quadrilateral meeting in Tehran between Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey as the direct fruit of the Iranian nation’s heroic resistance and the triumphant valor of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Speaking after the high-level gathering hosted by Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Secretary Major General Mohsen Rezaei, Deputy Secretary of SNSC Ali Bagheri Kani said the meeting reflected a shared understanding among the four parties of the need for cooperation, even as priorities and approaches differ.

He stressed that relying on internal capabilities remains the key to progress and security.

“Some regional countries once imagined that by aligning themselves with a major power like the United States they could shield themselves from any threat. In practice, however, they discovered that this notion did not align with reality,” Bagheri Kani said.

“Consequently, these nations have concluded that there is no alternative but to rely on regional engagement and to establish security based on cooperation and synergy among the countries of the region,” he stated.

He noted that Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey had previously held meetings among themselves and had expressed strong interest in Iranian participation, but conditions for Tehran’s attendance were not met. Later, the three countries themselves proposed traveling to Iran so the gathering could take place in Tehran.

During a recent visit to the Iranian capital, Pakistan’s Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir conveyed to Major General Mohsen Rezaei that one of the primary objectives of his trip was to inform Iranian officials of the three nations’ desire to convene jointly in Tehran.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says what the visiting side said the meeting was for. The Saudi Foreign Ministry said the Pakistan-initiated visit aimed to prevent further escalation. Pakistan's army chief presented Tehran with a negotiating proposal after Trump approved it, with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan and Qatar as possible guarantors. Without this, a reader believes the states came to Tehran having turned away from the US towards Iran's security model.

How we know

Bagheri Kani linked the momentum for such dialogue to .

He said that in recent years the regime had sought to project power but in reality only demonstrated its savagery and an unbridled appetite for expansion.

The concept of a “Greater Israel,” which encompasses many nations in the region, . This recognition has created a framework for consensus among regional countries aimed at establishing internal security, making bilateral and multilateral meetings centered on the Islamic Republic of Iran a necessary undertaking.

The Tehran meeting took place in the wake of significant strategic developments and .

Bagheri Kani emphasized that the resistance of Iran’s Armed Forces and people, under the prudent leadership of Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei, not only thwarted the United States from achieving its objectives but left it in a state of desperation.

The Zionist regime, he added, is also not in a favorable position; the scenario it envisioned following its aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran did not unfold according to its plans.

He highlighted two fundamental points: first, that the Islamic Republic of Iran, relying on its own national and internal capabilities, stood firm against two overt acts of aggression by two different regimes and succeeded in both instances; second, that the capacity to counter these aggressions stemmed entirely from domestic resources.

“Our equipment and weaponry are the products of the intellect and ingenuity of our nation’s young scientists, as well as the efforts of our nation’s industrial experts and technologists. These capabilities were effectively proven in the field,” he stated.

Despite decades of Western sanctions aimed at denying Iran advanced equipment and technology, particularly in the military sphere, .

“The clearest evidence of this is the fact that both the United States and the Zionist regime failed to achieve their objectives,” Bagheri Kani stated. Sanctions have taken on new forms, while .

The quadrilateral talks, also attended on the Iranian side by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, brought together Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman, Pakistani Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir, and Turkish intelligence chief Ibrahim Kalin.

A joint statement issued afterward said the participants agreed to continue the dialogue to strengthen cooperation among the four regional countries, including for peace and security in the region.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article does not mention that the Houthis launched new attacks on Saudi Arabia the same day, while Saudi Arabia's defence minister sat at the table. A reader is left with a picture of untroubled regional consensus.

How we know

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian separately hosted the visiting officials and underscored support for any understandings that reinforce unity and constructive cooperation among Muslim nations in West Asia.

The gathering aligns with broader efforts to advance endogenous security in the region, drawing on Iran’s and the participation of regional actors, free from foreign interference.

Read the original article on presstv.ir (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

Press TV reports a four-country security meeting in Tehran mostly through an Iranian official's account, then repeats his claims in its own voice: that Iran's military has 'proven' itself, that the United States is a 'terrorist administration', and that the meeting draws on 'Iran's successful model'. It leaves out what Saudi and Pakistani officials said the talks were for. Pakistan's army chief carried a negotiating proposal approved by Trump and Riyadh wanted to prevent escalation, so a reader comes away thinking the visitors came to endorse Iran's security doctrine.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “has underscored that the regime acts as a source of instability”

    Why this matters
    The words 'has underscored that the regime acts as a source of instability' set out an Iranian official's argument in Press TV's narration, with no 'he said' attached.
    The impression it gives
    That it is an established finding that a 'Greater Israel' concept has shown the region Israel is the cause of instability.
    The context
    This is Bagheri Kani's argument, which the previous sentences attribute to him. Here the attribution is dropped.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Bagheri Kani linked the momentum for such dialogue”

    Show it in the article

    “driven primarily by the brutal aggression of the Zionist regime”

    Why this matters
    Press TV states in its own voice that the developments behind the meeting were 'driven primarily' by Israel.
    The impression it gives
    That Israel's actions were the main reason the four countries met.
    The context
    Other reports give other reasons. The Saudi Foreign Ministry said the visit, initiated by Pakistan, was meant to prevent further escalation, and the talks also covered Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the advancements achieved through the dedication of young personnel within the Armed Forces have proven their efficacy”

    Why this matters
    Press TV takes Bagheri Kani's boast about Iranian weaponry and restates it as its own conclusion.
    The impression it gives
    That it is independently established that Iran's domestically built weapons have proved effective.
    The context
    The article's only basis is the official's own quoted claim. It offers no other source.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“These capabilities were effectively proven in the field,” he stated.”

    Show it in the article

    “the horrific and barbaric nature of those imposing them has become increasingly apparent to the world”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the states imposing sanctions 'horrific and barbaric' in its own narration and says the world increasingly sees them that way.
    The impression it gives
    That a global judgement on the sanctioning states is a reported fact.
    The context
    The article cites no source for what 'the world' has concluded. The verdict is the outlet's own.

    Show it in the article

    “successful model of national security-building through indigenous capabilities”

    Why this matters
    Press TV ends the article by calling Iran's security approach a 'successful model' that the gathering draws on, in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    That the visiting states came to adopt Iran's security doctrine.
    The context
    Other reports describe de-escalation talks. Pakistan's army chief brought a proposal approved by Trump for negotiations, with the three states and Qatar as possible guarantors.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Bagheri Kani said Israel's actions had driven the region towards cooperation and that Iran's domestically built weapons had proved themselves. Saudi Arabia said the Pakistan-initiated visit was meant to prevent further escalation.

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article never says what the visiting side said the meeting was for. The Saudi Foreign Ministry said the Pakistan-initiated visit aimed to prevent further escalation. Pakistan's army chief presented Tehran with a negotiating proposal after Trump approved it, with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan and Qatar as possible guarantors. Without this, a reader believes the states came to Tehran having turned away from the US towards Iran's security model.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  3. Smears a named person

    Minor

    “the terrorist administration of the United States”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the US government a 'terrorist administration' in its own narration, not in a quote.
    The impression it gives
    That the US administration being terrorist is a settled fact the outlet can simply state.
    The context
    The article gives no fact to support a terrorism charge. It is a label in the outlet's voice, not attributed to anyone.

    Show it in the article

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the destabilizing role of the Zionist regime”

    Why this matters
    Press TV uses 'Zionist regime' for Israel's government in its own paraphrase, not inside a quotation.
    The impression it gives
    That the label is a neutral description.
    The context
    'Zionist regime' is a party's term. It belongs in quotation marks, attributed to whoever uses it.

    Show it in the article

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article does not mention that the Houthis launched new attacks on Saudi Arabia the same day, while Saudi Arabia's defence minister sat at the table. A reader is left with a picture of untroubled regional consensus.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 26 OctVessels violating Iran’s protocols in southern waters will suffer damage: Top commander3.0
  2. 26 OctLeader outlines roadmap for an ‘ever-stronger Iran,’ urges elites to break scientific boundaries0.0
  3. 26 OctIran, Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia hold security meeting in Tehran6.0
  4. 26 OctIran’s president urges regional unity as he hosts Pakistani, Saudi, Turkish officials6.0
  5. 26 OctIran, Turkey, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia could advance region-led security framework in Tehran: FM spox3.0

Everything we scored from Press TV