The Scotsman, on UK Politics, 3 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Reform UK to force MSPs to vote on burqa ban in Scotland

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Reform UK is set to force a vote on banning burqas in Scotland, saying other political parties “conspired” to end their previous debate on the issue “prematurely”. Last month, the party’s deputy Scottish leader Thomas Kerr led a members’ business debate on restricting face-coverings in public, including the burqa and the niqab. During that debate, Mr Kerr described the veils as “oppressive” and said they had “no place in modern Scotland”, arguing that a ban is needed in the interests of public safety.

However , with Reform UK being accused of racism and . MSPs do not vote on members’ business debates, but Reform UK has now tabled an opposition debate on the same issue for Wednesday afternoon. Unlike members’ business debates, MSPs will be required to vote in an opposition debate. Subscribe to The Steamie morning politics newsletter Mr Kerr told The Scotsman the previous debate was cut short before many Reform UK MSPs were able to have their say.

He said: “During the previous face-covering debate, I was the only Reform MSP who had the chance to speak before other parties conspired to bring the debate to a premature end. “A members’ debate had not been denied a continuation in this way before. “My fellow MSPs who hold a variety of views regarding face-coverings in public places intended to speak on that evening so this second debate effectively follows up the original slot to allow the full spectrum of those voices to be heard.”

The debate on Wednesday afternoon will be led by the party’s health spokeswoman Helen McDade MSP. Her motion asks MSPs to “note the ongoing debate across Scotland regarding the wearing of full-face coverings, including the burqa and niqab, in public places”. She adds that further restrictions on these veils could improve “public safety, individual liberty and community cohesion”. The burqa is a veil worn by some Muslim women that covers the face and body, leaving a mesh screen over the eyes to see through.

The niqab is a similar veil that leaves the area around the eyes clear. A number of European countries have either banned or restricted the wearing of burqas and other full-face veils in public spaces in recent years, including France, Belgium, Bulgaria, Austria, Denmark, The Netherlands, Germany, Luxembourg, Portugal and Italy. Under section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, police officers can stop and search pedestrians and vehicles for offensive weapons.

While the legislation does not allow police to remove face coverings, it does authorise searches, during which this could happen. In England and Wales, police officers can order people to remove face coverings under similar circumstances. As of April, police officers elsewhere in the UK also have the powers to declare mask-free zones for up to 24 hours during protests, but there are exemptions for religious, health and work reasons. Those in breach of these rules can face fines of up to £1,000 and up to one month in jail.

SNP MSP Steven Bonnar said: “This is yet another dangerous attempt by Reform at sowing division in our communities. “Women should be free to choose to wear what they want - the SNP will always back their right to do so and stand squarely against Reform’s toxic agenda of inciting racial tension in our society.”

Read the original article on scotsman.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Scotsman reports Reform UK's plan to force a Holyrood vote on a burqa ban. It attributes Reform's claims to the party and ends on an SNP rebuttal. In its own voice it says the earlier debate "descended into chaos" without saying what happened, and the Muslim women the ban targets, including those who protested, are never heard.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the debate descended into chaos”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice The Scotsman says the debate "descended into chaos", yet the only facts it gives are that Reform UK was accused of racism and that women protested outside the parliament.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away believing the chamber saw disorder, which also lends weight to Reform's later claim that the debate was wrongly cut short.
    The context
    The article describes no disorder inside the chamber. It reports only that the debate ended early. Mr Kerr's account of that is his own claim: "other parties conspired to bring the debate to a premature end".

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“other parties conspired to bring the debate to a premature end”

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “women protesting outside the parliament”

    Why this matters
    The Scotsman mentions women protesting outside the parliament but quotes none of them. Reform UK gets four sentences of quotes and its motion is quoted twice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears the case for the ban at length and the case against it only from an SNP politician.
    The context
    The garments in question are worn by Muslim women, as the article itself says. No Muslim woman, and no protester, is quoted anywhere in the piece.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a veil worn by some Muslim women”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “saying other political parties “conspired” to end their previous debate on the issue “prematurely””

    The article attributes Reform's charge of a conspiracy to the party, in quotation marks, rather than adopting it.

  • “The burqa is a veil worn by some Muslim women”

    The article describes the garment neutrally and says "some" Muslim women wear it, without framing the community as a threat.

  • “Women should be free to choose to wear what they want”

    The article closes on a rebuttal to Reform's proposal, so the party's public safety claim does not get the last word.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Scotsman

  1. 3 NovScottish police officers call for more powers to tackle e-bikes after 1,000 seized this year0.0
  2. 3 NovAnother general election! Why Labour is preparing to go to the polls early – Brian Monteith0.0
  3. 2 NovImmigration retreat shows Burnham is less keen to fight his own MPs than Starmer3.0
  4. 2 NovScots Labour MP warns Andy Burnham against rejoining 'imperialist' EU0.0
  5. 2 NovSwinney under fire for 'spineless refusal' to back Rosebank despite Adura meetings3.0

Everything we scored from The Scotsman