The Jerusalem Post, on West Bank, 25 October 2026

The Jerusalem Post tells the Hebron operation entirely through Israeli military and government voices. It writes the removal of about 2,000 Palestinians as an evacuation with no actor, states in its own voice that it was meant to protect them, and never reports that the Palestinian Authority and B'Tselem called the demolitions and removals collective punishment. It uses eliminate for the killing of two men, ties a whole Hebron clan to the attack when the paper itself reported a day earlier that the military had no specifics on the 2,000 expelled, and never says the West Bank is occupied or that the occupation has been ruled unlawful.

9.7

Serious

out of 10

What we found

  1. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “approximately 2,000 residents were evacuated”

    What the words do
    Writes the removal of 2,000 Palestinians from their homes as an evacuation in the passive voice, with no actor and no word that it was forced.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That people were moved out for their own safety, by nobody in particular, in a routine precaution.
    What is actually the case
    The Jerusalem Post's own earlier article says Israeli troops, Shin Bet and Border Police forcibly evacuated 2,000 Hebron-area Palestinians, and the Times of Israel reported the Palestinian Authority calling it collective punishment.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces, Shin Bet and Border Police forcibly removed about 2,000 Palestinians from their homes in the Hebron area, a step the Palestinian Authority and B'Tselem called collective punishment.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “the evacuation was intended to protect them from potential clashes”

    What the words do
    Asserts in the paper's own voice what the expulsion of 2,000 Palestinians was intended to achieve, with no attribution and no challenge.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the removal was a protective measure taken for the Palestinians' benefit.
    What is actually the case
    B'Tselem said Israeli leaders were announcing plans for collective punishment and acts that could constitute war crimes, and Israel's finance minister said publicly that the demolitions were ordered to exact a price for the attack.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The military said the removals were to let it search the area; the Palestinian Authority and B'Tselem called them collective punishment, and the finance minister said demolitions were ordered to exact a price.

  3. Writes the death out

    Serious

    “to eliminate them”

    What the words do
    Uses eliminate for killing two men, in the paper's own voice, when describing the drone the military could not deploy.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the military was prevented from carrying out a technical removal rather than from shooting two people dead.
    What is actually the case
    The article itself says the two men were killed, in the next sentence, so the euphemism is the paper's choice and not the only wording available to it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“actively engaged the terrorists and killed them”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    During that time the military was unable to deploy an attack drone or aerial surveillance to kill them.

  4. Judges a whole people on a few

    Serious

    “The terrorists came from a very large clan in Hebron, one of whose members was released as part of the Gilad Schalit prisoner exchange deal.”

    What the words do
    Ties an entire Hebron family to the attack through two attackers and one relative freed in a prisoner exchange years ago, placed directly after a call to dismantle terrorist networks.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the clan as a whole is a terrorist network and that removing its 2,000 members was therefore justified.
    What is actually the case
    The Jerusalem Post reported a day earlier that the military gave little information about any offences by the 2,000 expelled Palestinians and that its own sources had no specifics linking clan members to terror.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The two attackers belonged to a large Hebron clan; the military has not said what, if anything, links the clan's other members to the attack.

  5. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “tensions in the West Bank are escalating”

    What the words do
    Describes Israeli military operations, demolitions and mass removals in the West Bank without once saying the territory is occupied or that the occupation has been ruled unlawful.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Israeli forces are policing ordinary territory where tensions happen to be rising.
    What is actually the case
    The International Court of Justice found in July 2024 that Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem is unlawful; the word occupied appears nowhere in this article about demolitions and expulsions there.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    In the occupied West Bank, where the International Court of Justice has found Israel's occupation unlawful, Israeli occupation forces have deployed an additional divisional headquarters.

  6. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article never reports that the Palestinian Authority and B'Tselem called the demolitions and removals collective punishment, with B'Tselem warning of forcible displacement and acts that could constitute war crimes. Without this a reader believes the operation drew no objection and was a protective measure.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  7. Drops what it reported before

    Serious

    What is missing

    The paper reported a day earlier that the military gave almost no information about any offences by the 2,000 expelled Palestinians beyond their family connection, and that its own military sources had no specifics. This article drops that and instead presents the clan link as explanation.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  8. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “This was not the work of a lone attacker, but rather an organized terrorist network that received assistance from additional operatives in obtaining a handgun, an M4 rifle, ammunition, and training.”

    What the words do
    States the conclusion of an unfinished security-service investigation as established fact, with no source attached.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That an organised network behind the attack has been identified and proved.
    What is actually the case
    The article says two sentences earlier that the IOF and Shin Bet are still investigating to determine which network, if any, assisted the attackers, and it offers nothing beyond the security services' assessment.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“are still investigating the incident”

    Show it in the article

    “The terrorists studied the terrain, conducted reconnaissance, and developed operational plans”

    What the words do
    Presents the attackers' preparations as known detail in the paper's voice.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That investigators have established exactly how the two men prepared.
    What is actually the case
    The only basis given anywhere in the piece is the military and Shin Bet assessment, which the article says is still being investigated; no evidence for the reconnaissance claim is offered.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“to determine what terrorist network assisted the attackers”

    Show it in the article

  9. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “According to the defense minister”

    What the words do
    Sources the account of 2,000 people losing their homes to the Israeli defence minister alone; the Israeli military, Shin Bet, the Central Command chief, the prime minister and the defence minister are the article's only voices.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the operation is fully accounted for by the Israeli officials carrying it out.
    What is actually the case
    No Palestinian resident, official or rights group is quoted anywhere, although the Palestinian Authority and B'Tselem both responded publicly to the same operation.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  10. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article does not say that Israeli forces closed five of the seven entrances to the Hebron region, home to over a million Palestinians, bringing life in the West Bank's main economic hub to a halt. Without it a reader believes the operation amounted to searches of 200 buildings and a temporary removal.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

IDF pushing for Hebron attack to be classified as clash between soldiers, terrorists, not terror

The IDF is making an effort to characterize Friday's incident in Hebron as an encounter between combat troops and two terrorists, rather than a terrorist attack, in an attempt to avoid professional criticism over the advance preparations of the Judea Regional Brigade, operating under the 98th Division.At the same time, however, the military says the troops' response prevented a larger attack. The IDF and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) are still investigating the incident to determine what terrorist network assisted the attackers. At the time of writing, the assessment is that the attack was carried out by a Hamas cell that received assistance from the organization's headquarters in Turkey. that enabled them to hold off IDF forces for more than 20 minutes. During that time, the military was unable to deploy an attack drone or an aerial surveillance system .Nevertheless, the IDF has noted that the bravery of the soldiers must be acknowledged. The regional defense officer, who found himself caught up in the incident, and the deputy battalion commander actively engaged the terrorists and killed them.There is no doubt that this terrorist network operated under the noses of IDF and Shin Bet intelligence officials, despite a general warning that Hamas intended to carry out attacks in the area ahead of the elections scheduled for this coming Tuesday.Shin Bet, IDF arrest suspects for possible knowledge, support of terror attackOver the past 24 hours, IDF and Shin Bet forces have arrested several Palestinians suspected of assisting the terrorists, or at least knowing that they were preparing to carry out an attack.The suspects were transferred to the Shin Bet for questioning, and further arrests are expected.IDF Central Command chief Maj. Gen. Avi Bluth emphasized that the military acted as a protective barrier, shielding the civilian population from terrorism, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz spoke of offensive operations.At a time when , and the IDF has deployed an additional divisional headquarters, the 98th Division, to improve command and control capabilities in violent hotspots and areas facing an immediate terrorist threat, the question must be asked: What has the IDF actually done so far?IDF demolishes illegal structures in HebronThe IDF demolished illegal structures in the Hebron area earlier in the morning, demolitions that had already been planned and were unrelated to the terrorist attack. Troops searched 200 buildings in Hebron without finding weapons, ammunition, or terrorist infrastructure. , .It is clear that these residents will return to their homes shortly and that while IDF forces searched the area.A new and effective approach is needed to address terrorist hotspots in a city such as Hebron, which presents different challenges from the refugee camps in Jenin, Tulkarm, and Nablus. Such an approach is necessary not only to prevent copycat attacks and attacks inspired by this incident, but also to dismantle organized terrorist networks. The threat of further terrorist attacks continues to loom.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post