LBC, on UK Politics, 7 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Private school teacher who gave vulnerable student explicit books: 'I don't believe in censoring arts'

No framing issues found.

A private school teacher who gave a vulnerable pupil books containing images of sex, drugs and nudity defended her actions by saying A-level students are “young adults”. Fiona Simpson taught A-level photography at £51,552-a-year Burlington House School, which caters for pupils with special educational needs in Fulham, west London. When complaints were raised about the books she provided to a pupil, Ms Simpson claimed she did not believe in “censoring the arts”.

The books, which contained images of drug use, oral sex, a naked man with an erect penis and a blood-splattered bedroom, were Diary by Corinne Day, and Emotions & Relations. Ms Simpson told a Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) conduct panel: “As far as allowing students to access specific books, I absolutely do not believe in censoring the arts. Read more: Katie Price’s ex-husband breaks silence on 'five years of hell' after being cleared of raping girl, 13 Read more: Russell Brand a "seriously unwell sex addict", says woman at centre of 2008 Sachsgate scandal “These are not primary school children; they are young adults.

They should definitely know about the history of photography and the key figures within it," she added. Despite the panel saying her explanation was “misguided”, Ms Simpson avoided a teaching ban. The panel said the use of the artists was not inherently inappropriate, but that the concern “is about the apparent disregard for the needs of a vulnerable pupil”. It added: “There was no evidence to suggest there was any material supervision, support or contextualisation provided in the directed research to these highly graphic images.

“It ought to have been readily apparent to Ms Simpson that providing this material in such an unstructured fashion to a vulnerable pupil came with significant risk to their wellbeing. “There was no suggestion that Ms Simpson gave any consideration to this risk or explored how it might be best to approach such sensitive imagery with other professional colleagues.” Ms Simpson, who joined the independent school in November 2022, was also found to have tapped the pupil on the bottom with a book or magazine.

CCTV footage showed her swinging the item towards the pupil as they walked ahead of her, the panel wrote. She said the contact was unintentional and was a gesture encouraging the pupil to return to class. But the panel concluded the contact was “inappropriate” and “entirely unwarranted”. She also took an unwell pupil to a cafe during school hours, which the panel ruled was a safeguarding failure. Burlington House School dismissed Ms Simpson during her probationary period in March 2023 and referred her to the TRA that June.

After a hearing in October 2026, the panel found Ms Simpson guilty of unacceptable professional conduct. But it recommended that she should not be banned from teaching, saying her misconduct was at the “lower possible end of the spectrum”. The panel said there was no evidence Ms Simpson had developed insight into her behaviour and warned there was a risk it could be repeated. But it concluded that publishing its findings would alert any employers to the risks and allow schools to put appropriate supervision in place.

Read the original article on lbc.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

LBC reports a Teaching Regulation Agency panel's findings against Fiona Simpson, a former photography teacher at a special educational needs school, and its decision not to ban her from teaching. The article attributes the findings to the panel, gives her own explanations, and reports that the panel placed her misconduct at the lower end of the spectrum. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “The panel said the use of the artists was not inherently inappropriate, but that the concern “is about the apparent disregard for the needs of a vulnerable pupil”.”

    LBC makes clear the panel did not condemn the photographers' work itself, only how it was given to a vulnerable pupil. This stops the reader taking the headline's "explicit books" as the panel's verdict on the art.

  • “She said the contact was unintentional and was a gesture encouraging the pupil to return to class.”

    LBC gives the teacher's own account of the contact before reporting the panel's conclusion, so a named person facing allegations is heard in her own words.

  • “saying her misconduct was at the “lower possible end of the spectrum””

    LBC reports the panel's own judgement of how serious the misconduct was, attributed and quoted, so the reader can weigh the findings in proportion.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from LBC

  1. 7 NovOne of Scotland's last surviving D Day veterans died a week before Remembrance Sunday0.0
  2. 7 NovRecord-breaking £1.7m raised by Poppy Appeal ahead of Remembrance Day0.0
  3. 7 NovTrump deserved thrashing in US mid-term election, says Kemi Badenoch0.0
  4. 7 Nov'We fought for the country, will this country fight for us?': Homeless veterans camping on Salisbury Plain ahead of Remembrance Sunday3.0
  5. 6 NovLondon Tube drivers to go on series of strikes across three months in row over four-day working week6.0

Everything we scored from LBC