Antiwar.com, on Iran, 25 October 2026

Antiwar.com reports an Israeli television account of a clash between Netanyahu and the Israeli military chief over an order for unspecified action against Iran, attributing each element to the outlet or source that carried it. It tells readers plainly that there is no evidence Iran decided to pursue nuclear weapons and that this was the US intelligence consensus, and it marks Netanyahu's nuclear claim as a claim. We found nothing in it that misleads the reader.

0.0

Nothing found

out of 10

Israeli Media: IDF Chief Resisted Netanyahu Order for Military Action Related to Iran

Israeli media reported on Sunday that an “unprecedented confrontation” is unfolding between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, as the army chief is resisting an order to take unspecified military action related to Iran ahead of Tuesday’s Knesset elections. It’s unclear exactly what Netanyahu has ordered, but the report from Israel’s Channel 12 said that the clash between the two is related to the “Iranian issue” and “the concern of Zamir and the military echelon that the political echelon could lead Israel into a scenario of miscalculation facing Iran just before the elections.” According to The Times of Israel , a military source said that it “relates to an action that could lead to a lightning confrontation with Iran, at a sensitive and dramatic moment, creating this [potential] miscalculation.” Other sources said military leaders were concerned about an effort by political leadership “to utilize the Iranian issue for political benefit,” while a political source was quoted as calling the allegations a “lie.” Zamir and Netanyahu in August 2025 (Israeli Government Press Office) The report came after Netanyahu shared an AI-generated image of an atomic blast in Tel Aviv that included comments made by Yuval Blumberg, an Israeli political commentator, that said Israel is in “real and tangible existential danger” over the alleged threat of Iran acquiring a nuclear bomb. Netanyahu has ramped up his rhetoric about Iran as the election approaches and has gone back to claiming Iran is trying to build a nuclear bomb, a claim he’s been making for decades. While both Netanyahu and President Trump frame the conflict with Iran as being about preventing a nuclear-armed Iran, there was no evidence either before the June 2025 war or the current war that Tehran had decided to pursue nuclear weapons, and that was the consensus of the US intelligence agencies. In the post on Sunday that quoted Blumberg, Netanyahu wrote that Israel has “another two years of Trump to finish the work in Iran, and there’s no telling what will come after that—whether it’s Kamala Harris or some other mediocre figure.” Israel’s Channel 12 reported that some US officials were concerned that Iran could take the statement as a threat and that it could lead to an Iranian attack on Israel. If you liked this article, please support Antiwar.com. We are 100% reader-supported.

Read the original article on news.antiwar.com (opens in a new tab)

What it gets right

  • “there was no evidence either before the June 2025 war or the current war that Tehran had decided to pursue nuclear weapons, and that was the consensus of the US intelligence agencies”

    It refuses to presuppose that Iran's nuclear programme is a weapons programme and sets the US intelligence finding against Netanyahu's and Trump's framing, instead of leaving that framing to stand.

  • “the alleged threat of Iran acquiring a nuclear bomb”

    It marks the nuclear-bomb threat as an allegation rather than stating it as the outlet's own fact.

  • “has gone back to claiming Iran is trying to build a nuclear bomb, a claim he’s been making for decades”

    It names whose claim this is and tells the reader how long it has been repeated, rather than reporting it as a new development.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Antiwar.com

Everything we scored from Antiwar.com