Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Iran, 3 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran rejects US response to peace proposal, insists on its seven conditions

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Iran on Tuesday rejected the United States' response to its latest proposal for ending the conflict, insisting that Washington meet all seven of Tehran's demands before the Strait of Hormuz can be reopened. “America’s response to Iran’s rights and demands was not convincing, and they must fully and explicitly address Iran’s seven conditions and act upon them," Iranian Security Chief Mohsen Rezaei wrote on X. “Only in this case will the Strait of Hormuz be reopened," he added.

Tehran has maintained that its seven-point proposal is the only acceptable framework for an agreement. Its demands include American compensation for war damage, an end to US economic pressure, and the lifting of the naval blockade on Iranian ports. The proposal also requires an end to hostilities throughout the region, including in Lebanon and Gaza, where Iranian-backed terrorist organizations operate. Additional conditions include the release of billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets and a reduction in the American military presence in the Middle East.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article reports Iran's demand for 'American compensation for war damage' and calls the war 'the conflict', but never says that the US and Israel launched the war against Iran on 28 February. Without this the reader cannot see why Iran asks for compensation, and the demand reads as unfounded.

How we know

Iran is also demanding a permanent end to the war rather than a temporary ceasefire. The proposal rules out future negotiations over the country's nuclear and missile programs. Rezaei's comments came amid uncertainty over whether President Donald Trump would authorize additional military strikes against Iran. On Monday, Trump downplayed speculation that major hostilities could resume immediately following Tuesday's midterm elections, arguing that the United States had already achieved victory.

“We had a war with Iran. We won," Trump told reporters. “I don’t know if you even call it a war because we haven’t been doing any fighting for months." The President subsequently expressed optimism about reaching an agreement that would reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end Iran's nuclear program. "Oil Prices are DROPPING LIKE A ROCK, down almost $10 a Barrel, A RECORD, because people feel that there will not be a War with Iran. Iran wants a settlement, as soon as possible.

It could happen!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. In an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News later Monday, Trump reiterated that preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons remained a central American objective. "We cannot let Iran, an evil nation, who has killed many of our people, Soleimani is an example, no longer with us, but killed many of our people, we cannot let them have a nuclear weapon, and we won't," he stated. Trump also warned that the United States retained the capability to strike Iran's Pickaxe Mountain nuclear facility at short notice.

"We bombed out all of their potential nuclear power. Now, we might have to go after Pickaxe [Mountain], but that's not a big deal. We can do it in, literally, we can do that in one hour, okay, as soon as we want, at any time we want." Despite the warning, Trump maintained that Tehran remained interested in negotiations, saying the Iranians ", there's a very good chance we make a deal."

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Arutz Sheva reports Iran's rejection of the US response to its seven-point proposal, then gives most of the article to Trump's remarks. It closes on his claim that Iran badly wants a deal, with no Iranian reply set against it. It also never says that the US and Israel launched the war whose damage Iran wants compensated.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “want to make a deal very badly”

    Why this matters
    The outlet closes the article on Trump's account of what Iran wants, after giving Trump fifteen sentences against two lines from Rezaei.
    The impression it gives
    The reader comes away believing that Iran is eager for a deal on US terms.
    The context
    Iran's negotiator Qalibaf said the same day that the decision on war now rests with Washington. The article quotes no Iranian response to Trump's claims.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article reports Iran's demand for 'American compensation for war damage' and calls the war 'the conflict', but never says that the US and Israel launched the war against Iran on 28 February. Without this the reader cannot see why Iran asks for compensation, and the demand reads as unfounded.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 3 NovFears of Iranian chemical weapons: Israel's warning to Washington6.0
  2. 3 NovTrump: US could strike Iran's Pickaxe Mountain in one hour3.0
  3. 3 NovReport: CIA Director urges Trump to maintain 'no war, no deal' Iran strategy6.0
  4. 3 NovReport: US hit Iran's Qeshm Island as part of secret strikes campaign3.0
  5. 3 NovVance: Trump and I feel pretty good about prospects of Iran deal6.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News