The National, on Iran, 28 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

UAE's Gargash says 'wars only lead to further crises' amid concerns of Iran escalation

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

<a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/gulf/2026/10/12/gargash-calls-for-stronger-gulf-security-and-collective-defence/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/gulf/2026/10/12/gargash-calls-for-stronger-gulf-security-and-collective-defence/">Dr Anwar Gargash</a>, diplomatic adviser to the UAE President, has warned that "wars lead only to further crises" amid mounting concerns over the growing possibility of a renewed US offensive on <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/28/live-iran-war-qatar/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/28/live-iran-war-qatar/">Iran</a>.

He emphasised that diplomacy remained the "most effective path" to achieving peace and security in the region, in a message on social media on Wednesday. Dr Gargash set out the UAE's stance in response to "growing speculation over possible escalation and confrontation". “The UAE’s approach remains firm and clear, based on wisdom, balance and prioritising dialogue and political solutions,” Dr Gargash wrote on X. “Regional experience has shown that wars lead only to further crises, and that diplomacy is the most effective path to safeguarding security and achieving peace and stability." <i>The Wall Street Journal</i> reported that the Trump administration warned several Gulf states to prepare for a possible renewed US military campaign against Iran after the November 3 midterm elections.

Mr Trump is leaning towards a short but intense wave of strikes, possibly aimed at Iranian nuclear sites, missile and drone arsenals and critical infrastructure, although he has not made a final decision and diplomatic efforts continue, the<i> Journal </i>said, quoting sources. Meanwhile, Qatari ​mediators ​presented ​Iran ⁠with a new ⁠draft deal ​on Sunday, aimed at reaching a permanent settlement to the war, a source told Reuters on Wednesday.

Tehran was ⁠considering ‌the proposal and expected to send a response by the end of the week, Reuters said. At the peak of the war, which started on February 28, Iran struck the UAE and other Gulf states with ballistic missiles and drones, attempting to strike civilian infrastructure, including energy sites and airports. <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/lifestyle/2026/08/13/how-25000-bars-of-soap-rallied-uae-community-to-save-home-grown-business/" target="_blank" rel="">The UAE was the most heavily attacked</a> country, facing more than 550 ballistic missiles and 2,265 drones, most of which were intercepted or destroyed before reaching their targets.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says only that the war "started on February 28" and then lists Iran's strikes on the Gulf. It never says the war is a United States and Israel war on Iran, and Israel does not appear in the article at all. Without this a reader takes Iran's missile and drone strikes as the start of the war rather than part of it.

How we know

A ceasefire began in June when the US and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding intended to pave the way for a final peace settlement. Mr Trump declared the truce and MoU “over” in early July after renewed Iranian attacks on ships in the Strait of Hormuz and retaliatory American strikes. Both sides have indicated in recent weeks that they are preparing for a resumption of hostilities.

Read the original article on thenationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The National reports Anwar Gargash's call for diplomacy and the Wall Street Journal's account of a possible renewed US campaign against Iran. Its short history of the war lists Iran's strikes on the Gulf but never says the United States and Israel waged the war on Iran, and Israel does not appear in the article at all.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says only that the war "started on February 28" and then lists Iran's strikes on the Gulf. It never says the war is a United States and Israel war on Iran, and Israel does not appear in the article at all. Without this a reader takes Iran's missile and drone strikes as the start of the war rather than part of it.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The National

  1. 28 OctIran 'welcomes negotiations' after reported Qatari-mediated draft deal3.0
  2. 28 OctOman calls for economic and security pact between Iran and Gulf countries3.0
  3. 28 OctIran war puts Republican foreign policy hawks under pressure before midterms0.0
  4. 27 OctIran-linked Handala hacking group sends bouquets and letters to Israel polling sites6.0
  5. 27 OctInside Tehran talks: Iranians link Houthi de-escalation to US approval of regional truce6.0

Everything we scored from The National