Antiwar.com, by Dave DeCamp, on Iran, 9 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Iran Responds to Rubio’s Rejection of Its Peace Proposal

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Iran has responded to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s rejection of its proposal to fully open the Strait of Hormuz and start negotiations on a final deal, as a breakthrough between the two sides still appears unlikely. Rubio said on Sunday that Iran’s conditions, which include the US ending its blockade of Iranian ports and providing sanctions relief, are “outrageous and ridiculous” and cast doubt on the chances of a deal. “The president would always prefer to solve this and every problem diplomatically.

Sometimes that’s not possible, unfortunately,” Rubio told reporters in Florida. “If there’s a chance to do it, we’ll explore it. Right now, it hasn’t been very productive because the Iranian demands are simply not just unacceptable, but in some cases, outrageous and ridiculous, and really not realistic,” he added. departs Homestead, Florida, en route to Paris, France for the G7, November 8, 2026. (Official State Department photo by Freddie Everett) Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei was asked about Rubio’s remarks during a press conference in Tehran on Monday.

“What is unreasonable about Iran’s demand that the United States lift its illegal sanctions before any negotiating process can begin?” he said. “What is unreasonable about asking the United States to end its naval blockade and what it has called ‘economic exclusion operations’? What is unreasonable about the Iranian people’s demand that the war on all fronts be stopped before any negotiating process begins? What is unreasonable and absurd is the US attack on Iran in the middle of negotiations,” Baghaei added.

The Iranian spokesman also referenced Iran’s “two-day proposal” to open the strait, calling it the most reasonable offer on the table. “Could there be a more reasonable proposal than this: if the United States meets Iran’s demands, positive developments will follow across the region within two days, and security will return to the Strait of Hormuz?” he said. The comments come after US Central Command announced it was expanding its blockade on Iran to include land routes, and the US continues launching strikes against Iran’s Qeshm Island.

, saying on Sunday that the US has picked out 38 bridges “that we can knock down in literally ⁠one ​hour.” If you liked this article, please support Antiwar.com. We are 100% reader-supported.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article leaves out that in the same Sunday remarks Trump said renewed fighting was highly unlikely, that he was reluctant to knock down bridges, and that any strike depended on whether Iran signed an agreement. Without this, a reader takes the 38 bridges quote as evidence of a campaign already escalating, rather than as a conditional threat.

Read the original article on news.antiwar.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Antiwar.com reports Rubio's rejection of Iran's conditions and Baghaei's reply fairly, quoting both men at length and naming the US blockade and US strikes on Qeshm Island. In its own voice, though, it says Trump continues to escalate into a full-scale bombing campaign against civilian infrastructure, when the evidence it gives is a threat. It leaves out that on the same day Trump said he was reluctant to act and that his decision depended on a deal.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Trump also continues to escalate into a full-scale bombing campaign that targets civilian infrastructure”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, Antiwar.com says Trump "continues to escalate into a full-scale bombing campaign that targets civilian infrastructure". The only support it gives is Trump's remark that the US has picked out 38 bridges it could knock down.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes a full-scale US bombing campaign against Iran's civilian infrastructure is under way and growing.
    The context
    Trump's bridges remark was a threat about possible strikes. Euronews reports that in the same remarks he said he was reluctant to act and that his decision depended on whether Iran signed an agreement. The article itself records only strikes on Qeshm Island, not a full-scale campaign against bridges or power plants.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Trump threatened to widen the bombing to Iran's civilian infrastructure, saying on Sunday that the US has picked out 38 bridges "that we can knock down in literally one hour", though he said he was reluctant to act and that his decision depended on a deal.

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article leaves out that in the same Sunday remarks Trump said renewed fighting was highly unlikely, that he was reluctant to knock down bridges, and that any strike depended on whether Iran signed an agreement. Without this, a reader takes the 38 bridges quote as evidence of a campaign already escalating, rather than as a conditional threat.

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Antiwar.com

  1. 8 NovKatz Says Israel’s War Against Iran Is ‘Not Complete’0.0
  2. 8 NovUS Bombs Commercial Ship as CENTCOM Expands Iran Blockade to Land Routes0.0
  3. 4 Nov‘You’re Either With Us or Against Us’: Bessent Doubles Down on Economic War Against Iran After Midterms0.0
  4. 4 NovIran’s Ghalibaf: ‘Americans Said No to War’3.0
  5. 3 NovTrump Says US Watched Iran Build Air Defense Facility on Qeshm Island Before Bombing It0.0

Everything we scored from Antiwar.com