Press TV, on Iran, 29 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Former US president Obama warns war on Iran has left US ‘more vulnerable’ as Tehran holds Hormuz ‘veto power’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Former US president Barack Obama has warned that the war on Iran has left the US “more vulnerable” as the Islamic Republic continues to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed, effectively holding “veto power” over the strategic waterway.

Speaking at a campaign rally in suburban Atlanta, Georgia, on Wednesday, Obama slammed US President Donald Trump’s handling of launched jointly with Israel against Iran on February 28.

“I didn’t have to fire any missiles. I engaged in diplomacy,” Obama said, criticizing Trump’s hostile policy against Iran, eight months after the war, whose costs ballooned to $47 billion, according to official figures.

“Our allies and bases have been attacked. Americans have been killed. Hundreds of Americans have been wounded. We have run down our stock of missiles, making us more vulnerable, and Iran now has veto power over the Strait of Hormuz,” Obama added during his speech delivered as part of his cross-country campaign tour before next week’s midterm elections, a vote that could shape the final two years of Trump’s presidency.

This is the “reason why the price of oil is up,” the former president stressed, referring to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly one-fifth of global oil demand passes. The waterway is one of the world's most strategically important maritime chokepoints.

Iran has so far refused to ease its restrictions on transit through Hormuz, saying the key international energy waterway will be fully reopened once the US permanently ends its aggression and lifts its maritime blockade and sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

Under Obama, the US signed the landmark nuclear agreement with Iran, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), in 2015 after 20 months of marathon negotiations. The other signatories were China, France, Germany, Russia, and the United Kingdom.

Under the agreement, the US and the EU agreed to remove anti-Iran sanctions imposed over the years in exchange for Iran limiting its uranium enrichment and reducing its existing stockpile.

However, on May 8, 2018, then US president Trump officially announced that he was unilaterally withdrawing the US from the JCPOA and imposed the “strongest sanctions in history” on Iran under the so-called “maximum pressure” campaign.

Read the original article on presstv.ir (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Press TV reports Barack Obama's campaign criticism of Trump's war on Iran with his words quoted and attributed. In its own voice the outlet calls the war 'unprovoked' and a 'war of aggression' and says Iran 'defended itself', loaded wording it could have attributed to Tehran, as it does with Iran's conditions for reopening Hormuz.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “the unprovoked 40-day war of aggression”

    Why this matters
    In its own narration, not in Obama's quoted words, Press TV calls the war "unprovoked" and a "war of aggression".
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes it is settled fact, and Obama's own verdict, that the war was unprovoked aggression.
    The context
    This is one party's legal and political characterisation. The article itself attributes the word "aggression" to Iran later on. Obama is quoted only as criticising Trump's handling and saying he chose diplomacy, not as calling the war unprovoked.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“once the US permanently ends its aggression”
    • Elsewhere in the article“I engaged in diplomacy,” Obama said”

    Show it in the article

    “During the aggression, Iran defended itself by striking US bases and assets in West Asia.”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the war "the aggression" again and describes Iran's strikes on US bases as Iran having "defended itself". This sentence is in the outlet's voice with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes it as established that Iran's strikes were lawful self-defence. That is not presented as Iran's position.
    The context
    Whether the strikes were self-defence is Tehran's stated position. The outlet could have attributed it to Iran, as it does with Iran's conditions for reopening Hormuz. Obama's quoted words describe the strikes only as attacks on allies and bases.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Our allies and bases have been attacked.”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 29 OctIran6.0
  2. 29 OctIRGC Navy captures, lands US spy drone intact in Strait of Hormuz7.3
  3. 29 OctIran6.0
  4. 29 OctIRGC Navy captures, lands US spy drone intact in Strait of Hormuz6.0
  5. 28 OctIran0.0

Everything we scored from Press TV