Le Monde (English), on Climate, 8 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

COP31: Can global climate conferences be reformed?

No framing issues found.

A sign showing the way to the site of COP31, near the entrance to the Antalya Expo grounds in Antalya, Turkey, on September 30, 2026. GOKSEL YAPAR / AFP They have been accused of producing results that fall far short of the reality of the climate catastrophe. Of having become "monsters," with tens of thousands of participants traveling each year from one end of the planet to the other. Of throwing open the door to fossil fuel lobbyists.

They have also come under fire for their organization, sometimes entrusted to countries that disregard human rights and are major producers of hydrocarbons. Too large, too slow, too inefficient: The United Nations Climate Change Conferences, known as conferences of the parties (COP), whose 31 st session begins Monday, November 9, in Antalya, Turkey, have faced mounting criticism from negotiators, experts and non-governmental organizations alike.

These critiques have, in turn, sparked calls and proposals for reform. In recent years, dozens of prominent figures have urged a "fundamental overhaul of the COP," while 200 civil society organizations have demanded "urgent, drastic and comprehensive change." The issue also came up during COP17 on biodiversity, which concluded on October 31 in Armenia. You have 86.12% of this article left to read. The rest is for subscribers only.

Read the original article on lemonde.fr (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

Le Monde sets out the criticisms made of the UN climate conferences as COP31 opens in Antalya: results short of the climate catastrophe, sheer size, fossil fuel lobbyists and hosts that produce hydrocarbons. It reports the calls for reform and attributes each criticism to the people making it. Only the opening of the piece is visible, and nothing in that part misleads its reader.

What it gets right

  • “fall far short of the reality of the climate catastrophe”

    Le Monde treats the climate catastrophe as a reality in its own voice. It does not hedge the science as one side of a debate.

  • “have faced mounting criticism from negotiators, experts and non-governmental organizations alike”

    The article says who is making the criticisms, so the reader knows these are critics' views and not the outlet's verdict.

  • “Of throwing open the door to fossil fuel lobbyists.”

    The article names the fossil fuel lobby's presence at the talks as a concern. It does not leave the industry's role unmentioned.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Le Monde (English)

  1. 8 NovCOP31 conference in Turkey aims to move climate up the agenda in a crisis-rocked world0.0
  2. 8 NovCOP31 memo: Schedule, organization and key issues at the Antalya climate conference0.0
  3. 6 Nov2026 'most likely' to be second-hottest year on record says EU monitor0.0
  4. 3 NovBilly Barr, a modern hermit and climate sentinel in Colorado's Rocky Mountains0.0
  5. 3 Nov'Super El Niño' continues to intensify: 'It has already reached unprecedented levels'3.0

Everything we scored from Le Monde (English)