Anadolu Agency (English), on Gaza, 12 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Turkish unions highlight at COP31

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findingsSee them marked on aa.com.tr

Exhibition centers on a resilient olive tree symbolizing Palestinians' attachment to their homeland and keys representing displaced families' enduring hope of return Turkish labor unions highlighted the humanitarian and environmental devastation in Gaza at COP31 with an exhibition. The Hope of Return: Al-Awda – The Story of the Olive Tree opened in Türkiye's Mediterranean city of Antalya, which is hosting the UN climate summit. The Turkish Confederation of Civil Servant Unions (Memur-Sen) and the International Labour Confederation (ILC) organized the exhibition.

The exhibition also features a selection of photographs taken by Anadolu Agency photojournalists working in Gaza, alongside works by Palestinian painters and graphic artists. The exhibition will remain open to visitors at the COP31 Green Zone Congress Center foyer from Nov. 9 to 20. Through interactive installations, visitors journey from Gaza's once-vibrant streets to , accompanied by personal testimonies recorded amid the rubble.

The exhibition displays everyday objects brought from Palestine as silent witnesses to . At its center stands a damaged yet resilient olive tree, symbolizing the Palestinian people's enduring attachment to their homeland. Rooted in the past and reaching toward the future, the tree represents peace, solidarity and the promise of life despite widespread destruction. A map of Palestine made from keys representing homes in Gaza also highlights the plight of displaced Palestinian families.

Many Palestinian families forced to leave in 1948 took their house keys with them, believing they would eventually return, and passed them down through generations. The keys have since become powerful symbols of the Palestinian right of return. The exhibition also features a selection of photographs taken by Anadolu Agency photojournalists working in Gaza, alongside works by Palestinian painters and graphic artists. Animated visuals comparing Gaza before and after the destruction further illustrate .

Gaza's environmental devastation The exhibition also highlights the scale of environmental destruction in Gaza. It presents figures on explosive munitions, carbon emissions, damaged infrastructure, agricultural losses, and cultural heritage. According to the figures, the explosive force of munitions dropped on Gaza is equivalent to approximately 13 times the force of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945. The exhibition also states that carbon emissions generated during the first 60 days of the conflict exceeded the annual emissions of 20 countries.

Agricultural destruction is another central focus, with the displayed figures indicating that the number of olive trees in Gaza has fallen from approximately 2 million before the attacks to just 150,000. The exhibition further reports that , leaving more than 61 million tons of rubble. Meanwhile, 97% of agricultural land is reportedly unusable, and 45 of Gaza's 54 water facilities are said to be no longer operational.

The destruction extends to Gaza's historical and cultural heritage, with 208 of 325 historical and cultural sites reported to have been destroyed. Through these figures, the organizers seek to demonstrate that but also Gaza's soil, water resources, air quality and historical heritage. At the exhibition's exit, an interactive installation allows visitors to submit digital messages of hope and solidarity for Gaza and humanity.

Read the original article on aa.com.tr (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Anadolu reports an exhibition at COP31 on the destruction of Gaza, and it gives the exhibition's figures on munitions, rubble, farmland and water. The article never names Israel. Munitions are 'dropped', structures 'damaged' and 'the attacks' happen with no attacker, though Anadolu's own reporting the week before named Israel's genocidal war. It also calls the genocide 'the conflict' in its own voice.

  1. Hides who did it

    Serious

    “Gaza's humanitarian, environmental devastation”

    Why this matters
    The headline presents 'Gaza's humanitarian, environmental devastation' as a condition of the place, with no one causing it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader who sees only the headline learns that Gaza is devastated but not who devastated it.
    The context
    Anadolu's own reporting days earlier described families in Gaza 'devastated by Israel's genocidal war'. The word Israel appears nowhere in this article.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the devastation wrought by the war”

    Why this matters
    The phrase 'wrought by the war' makes the war itself the agent of the devastation.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the destruction as something a war produced, as if it had no author.
    The context
    The outlet's own earlier report names the actor: 'Israel's war in Gaza, which began in October 2023, has killed more than 74,000 Palestinians'.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “approximately 81% of structures in Gaza have been damaged”

    Why this matters
    The passive 'have been damaged' reports the destruction of most of Gaza's buildings with no actor.
    The impression it gives
    The reader is told the damage happened, not that someone did it.
    The context
    The same outlet attributes the destruction of Gaza's infrastructure to Israel's war in its own earlier reporting.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the attacks have affected not only buildings and infrastructure”

    Why this matters
    The article names 'the attacks' as the cause, yet it never says whose attacks they were.
    The impression it gives
    The reader knows there were attacks but has to guess at the attacker.
    The context
    Anadolu's earlier report names Israel's genocidal war as what devastated Gaza's families. The article itself refers to 'the attacks' in S19 without naming the attacker there either.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Turkish unions highlight Israel's destruction of Gaza at COP31. According to the exhibition's figures, the explosive force of munitions Israel dropped on Gaza equals about 13 Hiroshima bombs, and Israel's attacks have damaged about 81% of structures.

  2. Calls the genocide a conflict

    Minor

    “lives interrupted by the conflict”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet calls Israel's assault on Gaza 'the conflict' and describes lives as 'interrupted'.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the destruction as the result of a two-sided conflict.
    The context
    The UN Commission of Inquiry found that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. Anadolu itself called it 'Israel's genocidal war' a week earlier.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the consequences of the conflict”

    Why this matters
    The phrase 'the consequences of the conflict' again frames the before and after images of a destroyed Gaza as the outcome of a mutual conflict.
    The impression it gives
    The reader sees ruin with a symmetrical label attached to it.
    The context
    The destruction shown is the result of Israel's assault, which the UN Commission of Inquiry found to be genocide.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Anadolu Agency (English)

  1. 12 Nov53 countries, organizations urge Israel to allow rapid humanitarian access to Gaza0.0
  2. 12 NovLewis Hamilton condemns Gaza genocide, urges Israel to ‘let the aid trucks in’0.0
  3. 12 NovGaza's memory brought to COP31 through 'Hope of Return: Al-Awda' exhibition3.0
  4. 12 NovIsraeli strike kills Gaza goalkeeper days after final honoring slain athletes0.0
  5. 12 NovUS activists urge ICC to issue arrest warrants for Trump and Rubio over Gaza0.0

Everything we scored from Anadolu Agency (English)