The Guardian, on UK Politics, 14 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

‘The social contract is broken’: young people on feeling shut out of careers

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

We do not republish articles from The Guardian. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Guardian tells the stories of four young people struggling to find work, mostly in their own words and with their claims attributed to them. In one sentence it adopts in its own voice Peter's view that AI is having a devastating impact on entry-level jobs, which the article elsewhere reports only as his belief. Nothing else in it misleads.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Peter is also well aware of the devastating impact AI is having on opportunities”

    Why this matters
    The words "well aware of the devastating impact" put the claim that AI is devastating graduate opportunities in the outlet's own voice, as a known fact Peter has grasped.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that AI is already destroying entry-level software jobs, not as one interviewee's explanation.
    The context
    The article gives no figure or source for this. Elsewhere it reports the same idea as Peter's own view, and Peter himself names other causes, such as many computer science graduates and his lack of work experience.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“He blames AI for destroying entry-level jobs.”
    • Elsewhere in the article“it seems that everyone has a computer science degree”

What it gets right

  • “He blames AI for destroying entry-level jobs.”

    The caption keeps the claim about AI attributed to Peter rather than stating it as fact.

  • “believes some employers also fail to understand the adaptations that would help him succeed”

    It reports Liam's experience as an autistic job seeker in his terms and attributes the criticism of employers to him.

  • “All names have been changed”

    It tells the reader plainly that the interviewees' names are changed, protecting private people who share personal detail.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 14 NovTorture survivors may have been sent to Sussex asylum camp unlawfully, documentary reveals0.0
  2. 14 NovGuardian to follow lives of eight young people in their search for work0.0
  3. 14 NovUK-EU breakthrough will allow airport-style checks at Eurotunnel to avoid border ‘chaos’ 0.0
  4. 14 NovIt’s absurd that ‘Black English’ is not on the census. We should be free to claim that identity if we choose0.0
  5. 14 NovUK tells blind Nigerian pensioner to go home to India3.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian