Tehran Times, on Iran, 2 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Top judge calls for expedited, thorough judicial proceedings into

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

TEHRAN — Iran’s Judiciary Chief Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei has called for the expeditious handling of cases concerning US crimes against the Iranian nation, stressing that prompt judicial proceedings must be accompanied by meticulous examination of the evidence and the issuance of well-reasoned, legally sound judgments. Speaking at a meeting of the Judiciary High Council on Monday, November 2, 2026, Mohseni-Ejei addressed the .

He described these actions as clear instances of state-sponsored terrorism and violations of fundamental principles of international law, emphasizing that the cases must be adjudicated without undue delay while fully observing the requirements of judicial scrutiny, due process, and legal precision. The judiciary chief stressed that expediting proceedings should not come at the expense of a comprehensive examination of the evidence or the legal soundness of the final judgments.

In another part of his remarks, Mohseni-Ejei underscored the judiciary's responsibility to support productive businesses and legitimate economic operators, describing this as a fundamental and continuing institutional obligation. He said the importance of such support was particularly pronounced under the current circumstances, which he described as an all-out economic war imposed on the Iranian nation by its adversaries. November 4 symbolizes resistance, pursuit of justice: Mohseni-Ejei Commemorating November 4, Iran's National Day of Fighting Global Arrogance and Students' Day, Mohseni-Ejei described the occasion as a symbol of the Iranian nation's resistance and steadfastness.

November 4, corresponding to Aban 13 in the Iranian calendar, commemorates three pivotal events in contemporary Iranian history: the exile of Imam Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic, in 1964; the killing of protesting students by the Pahlavi regime in 1978; and the takeover of the former US embassy in Tehran in 1979. Iran observes the date as the National Day of Fighting Global Arrogance. Mohseni-Ejei said that, under Imam Khomeini's leadership, the Iranian people had challenged American power and prestige from the early days of the Islamic Revolution, adding that what he described as successive US defeats in confronting the Iranian nation had continued ever since.

He characterized the struggle against global arrogance as an expression of the pursuit of justice, the defense of fundamental values, opposition to oppression and solidarity with the oppressed. The judiciary chief also highlighted the significance of Students' Day, saying that during the Pahlavi era, the ruling establishment and its supporters had sought to prevent Iranian schoolchildren and university students from developing a commitment to truth-seeking and resistance to injustice.

Today, however, thanks to the Islamic Revolution, even young Iranian children are learning the principles of justice and opposition to oppression, he said.

Read the original article on tehrantimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Tehran Times reports the judiciary chief's call for quick but careful trials over US actions against Iran. In its headline and in its own narration it calls those actions "US crimes" as settled fact, though the proceedings have not reached judgment and the body shows the label is his. The rest of the report attributes his views to him with care.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “US crimes against Iran”

    Why this matters
    The headline attributes the call for proceedings to the judge, but the words "US crimes against Iran" stand in the outlet's own voice. Nothing marks them as his description.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that the acts in question are crimes, and that the courts are only working out the details.
    The context
    The body shows the characterisation is Mohseni-Ejei's. It also says the trials are still to be decided, with final judgments yet to come. The headline turns one side's charge in pending cases into the outlet's verdict.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“He described these actions as clear instances of state-sponsored terrorism”
    • Elsewhere in the article“the legal soundness of the final judgments”

    Show it in the article

    “judicial proceedings concerning US crimes against Iran, including the assassination of the country's senior officials”

    Why this matters
    In its own narration the outlet names the subject of the proceedings as "US crimes" and includes the assassinations of senior officials within them. It does not attribute either the label or the classification to the judge.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the outlet itself has found these acts to be crimes, before any court has ruled.
    The context
    In the very next sentence the article frames the legal characterisation as what the judge "described". The judge himself stresses that the cases still require examination of the evidence and well-reasoned judgments. Pending charges are presented as the outlet's fact.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“He described these actions as clear instances”
    • Elsewhere in the article“meticulous examination of the evidence and the issuance of well-reasoned, legally sound judgments”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Tehran Times

  1. 2 NovIran rejects uranium transfer abroad, says Hormuz reopening depends on US ending blockade3.0
  2. 2 NovNo stable security can emerge without Iran 3.0
  3. 2 NovPolice chief warns enemy interests worldwide could be targeted in future war0.0
  4. 2 NovIran’s SNSC secretary and Putin discuss West Asia in phone call0.0
  5. 1 NovLeader marks anniversary of Operation Zulfaqari, hails Iranian people’s role in Abadan victory0.0

Everything we scored from Tehran Times