Tehran Times, on Iran, 25 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

‘Rings of Revenge’: Tehran Women Rise for Vengeance

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

‘Rings of Revenge’: Tehran Women Rise for Vengeance

Iranian women donate wedding rings and gold to avenge as revenge vow enters ninth month

TEHRAN – Since February 28, and other martyrs of the war, and in the latest step, groups of women are offering their wedding rings and gold to pursue that revenge.

This is part of the first message by Ayatollah Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei on March 12, 2026, in which the issue of avenging the blood of the war martyrs was raised for the first time:

"I assure everyone that we won’t forgo avenging the blood of your martyrs. The revenge we have in mind is not just because of the martyrdom of the illustrious Leader of the Revolution. Every member of the nation who is martyred by the enemy constitutes a separate case that demands seeking revenge. A limited portion of this seeking revenge can already be seen. But until we completely take revenge, this file will remain on top of all the others.

We’re even more sensitive with regard to the blood of our children and infants. The crime deliberately committed by the enemy against the Shajarah-Tayyibah School in Minab and other similar cases will receive particular attention in this process of taking revenge."

Red flags of revenge have been present at nightly gatherings that began at the start of the war and have now passed more than 240 nights, with their largest presence at the vast, multi-million funeral of the martyred Leader of the Revolution.

Multiple rewards for avenging the assassins of the martyred Leader have so far been announced. For example, a campaign for revenge against Trump was launched from the early days of the war. The campaign’s website states:

Following the hostile actions of Zionist terrorist regimes and the United States of America in violating the sacred soil of Iran and assassinating the Leader of the Islamic Ummah, Grand Ayatollah Imam Khamenei (may his soul rest in peace), we, the free nations of the world, unanimously express our outrage against the perpetrators of these crimes. In light of the jihad decree issued by the supreme religious authorities in response to the assassination of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Seyyed Ali Khamenei, and the oppression of the Iranian people, the campaign “Kill Trump” has been launched with the aim of providing financial rewards for the assassin of Donald Trump, the criminal president of the United States.

By submitting the required information, you can join this international movement.

According to organizers, more than 665,000 people have so far joined this campaign, and more than $116 million has been allocated for it.

Rings that become a noose

In the latest move for revenge, groups of Iranian women have formed a separate campaign. A popular women’s group called “Madari” (Motherhood) is behind the initiative.

On Thursday night, October 22, hundreds of women held a gathering called “Rastakhiz of Tehran Women” (The Uprising of the Women of Tehran) in front of the main gate of the University of

Tehran in the city center. Women from different walks of life, including wives and daughters of martyrs of the two recent wars, volunteers and students, took part in the gathering, which featured speeches by women activists, choir performances and elegies, with “revenge” as the common thread and soul of the program.

Alongside the gathering, registration began for donating wedding rings to the avenger of Trump. A group of women under the name “Madaraaneh” (Maternal) has launched the “Rings of Revenge” campaign. These women have declared their wedding rings as the prize for revenge, and in a symbolic visualization, it was shown that each of the women’s rings will become a hangman’s noose around Trump’s neck.

The revenge-seeking women also joined the “Golden Retribution” drive by donating gold and money to share in every bullet spent for revenge. Notably, the “Nehzat-e Madari” movement, which runs the drive, gifted gold donors a bracelet with a bullet plaque as a reminder of this revenge and blood-seeking. The bracelets are a sign that these women consider retribution for as their mission.

Zahra, 36, an engineer and mother of three, said as she joined the drive: "This gold necklace is the only keepsake I have from my mother, and I am certain that if she were alive, she too would have prioritized avenging the Leader just as we do. So I donate it to share in every bullet fired in retribution against Trump."

Reyhaneh, 25, a graduate student who joined the drive by donating her bracelet, said: "The Iranian woman will not let these aggressor murderers go until we have taken retribution for each and every one of our martyrs. Gold is nothing; we will give our lives to eliminate these child-killers who bereaved us of our martyred Leader."

Marzieh, 45, a tailor and mother of four, explained why she joined the drive. "I had struggled to save this money to buy a new sewing machine; but if the spilled blood of my martyred Imam goes unanswered and I cannot see my young Imam [Ayatollah Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei], I want nothing. Punish the murderers so severely that they will never again dare to insult our Imam."

Ayatollah Seyed Mojtaba Khamenei had stressed in a message issued on July 9, coinciding with the funeral of the martyred Leader:

"Now, I offer these words to our martyred Leader: O unjustly slain Leader! O you who’ve been oppressed but are exalted! O righteous servant of God! As we bid farewell to your body with tearful eyes and broken hearts, we pledge to safeguard your legacy, to steadfastly traverse the straight path you laid out, to fear no hardships along the way, and to attach our hearts to divine promises and glad tidings as you did. We pledge to avenge your pure blood and the blood of all the martyrs of these two wars by taking revenge against the criminal, disgraceful murderers.

This vengeance is what our nation is demanding, and this must definitely be done. These criminals, whose names are fully documented from the highest to the lowest ranks, will carry their dream of a peaceful death in bed to the grave. They must know that this action doesn’t depend on my presence or that of any other official. Whether we are here or not, this will be done. Soon, free-spirited people throughout the world will each carry out a part of this divine mission."

Justice, not emotion

,

In an unprecedented move, after waving to cameras and reporters and boarding Air Force One, to head to Britain.

After the incident, Trump said his life is always in danger. It seems he will likely now also fear the wedding rings of Iranian women.

Read the original article on tehrantimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The Tehran Times reports a women's campaign that offers wedding rings and gold as a bounty for killing Donald Trump. In its own voice it presents a few hundred women at one gathering as the will of all Iranians, and it recasts a cash bounty for an assassination as a demand for justice. It also states as fact, with no source, that fear of Iranian revenge drove Trump's departure from Turkey.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “The shadow of revenge weighs so heavily on Trump that his exit from Turkey after the NATO summit in July turned into a historic scandal for the U.S. president.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet states as fact, with no source, that fear of Iranian revenge caused how Trump left Turkey. It also calls the departure a "historic scandal".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes it is established that Trump changed planes because he feared Iranian revenge.
    The context
    The article cites nobody for this cause. The only statement it reports from Trump is a general remark that his life is in danger, with no mention of Iran. The outlet asserts a leader's private motive as fact.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Trump said his life is always in danger”

    Show it in the article

    “Trump secretly exited through another door of the plane, boarded a catering truck and was transferred to another aircraft”

    Why this matters
    The outlet gives a detailed account of a secret switch of aircraft in its own voice, with no source.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the account as verified fact.
    The context
    The article names no witness, report or official for any part of this account. It then closes on speculation ("It seems he will likely now also fear") that it builds on this unsourced account.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“It seems he will likely now also fear”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    After the NATO summit in Turkey in July, Trump said his life is always in danger. The article offers no source linking his departure arrangements to Iranian threats.

  2. Judges a whole people on a few

    Minor

    “Iranians have pledged to avenge the blood of their martyred Leader”

    Why this matters
    The words "Iranians have pledged" give a vow of revenge to the Iranian people as a whole, in the outlet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the whole nation has made this pledge.
    The context
    The article's own reporting describes one gathering of hundreds of women, a few named donors and a website campaign whose figures come from its organisers. Nothing in the article measures what Iranians as a people want.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“hundreds of women held a gathering”
    • Elsewhere in the article“According to organizers, more than 665,000 people”

    Show it in the article

    “The demand for revenge has since become one of the most serious public demands in Iran.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet asserts, with no source, that revenge now ranks among the most serious public demands in the country.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes this has been established as the country's public opinion.
    The context
    The article offers no measure of public opinion. Its only evidence is nightly gatherings, a campaign website and a women's event of a few hundred people. It treats the government's people and its policies as the same thing.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“hundreds of women held a gathering”

    Show it in the article

  3. Tells the event as something else

    Minor

    “while such a demand must be seen through the lens of “justice.””

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet tells the reader that the campaign must be understood as justice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the campaign is a pursuit of justice, a legal or moral reckoning.
    The context
    The article's own account shows a cash bounty for whoever kills a named person, a campaign openly called "Kill Trump". That is a reward for an assassination, not a process of justice.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“providing financial rewards for the assassin of Donald Trump”
    • Elsewhere in the article“These women have declared their wedding rings as the prize for revenge”

    Show it in the article

    “If criminals do not face justice, they see the way paved for repeating their crimes.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet adds an unattributed argument that presents the bounty as a deterrent to crime, in its news narration.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes this as the outlet's settled view that rewarding a killing is a way of bringing criminals to justice.
    The context
    Nothing in the article describes any court, charge or legal process. The only mechanism it reports is money and gold offered for bullets and an assassin.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“to share in every bullet spent for revenge”

    Show it in the article

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “martyred Leader”

    Why this matters
    In its own narration the outlet calls Ali Khamenei the "martyred Leader", a religious honorific that carries a verdict.
    The impression it gives
    A reader receives the government's religious framing of his death as the outlet's neutral description.
    The context
    The plain description is that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed. "Martyred" belongs inside quotation marks from the officials and campaigners who use it.

    Show it in the article

    “the murderer of the martyred Leader”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet calls the killer a "murderer" and again uses "martyred" while explaining what the women believe.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the outlet's own verdict as part of the explanation of the bracelets.
    The context
    The sentence is meant to report what the women think. The outlet blends its own loaded terms into that report instead of attributing them.

    Show it in the article

  5. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Some American media and analysts try to portray the issue of revenge as emotional”

    Why this matters
    The outlet mentions critics only as unnamed "American media and analysts", sums up their view in a few words and dismisses it at once.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the only objection to the campaign is that it is emotional.
    The context
    The article quotes campaign supporters and officials at length. No named critic, US official or other voice is quoted on a public bounty for killing a head of state.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Tehran Times

  1. 25 OctNothing will be the same as it was before 40-day war: Araghchi3.0
  2. 24 OctTwelve countries condemn any attack or threat against nuclear facilities0.0
  3. 24 OctFurther escalation between US and Iran would have no winners, says French FM0.0
  4. 24 OctSenior adviser to IRGC chief: Netanyahu has strengthened Iran and Palestinian cause3.0
  5. 24 OctNo Persian Gulf for old carriers6.0

Everything we scored from Tehran Times