LBC, on Iran, 8 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Trump says he is 'unlikely' to order Iran attack if talks progress

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

Donald Trump has said he is highly unlikely to order fresh attacks on Iran as long as talks to end the conflict progress. Speaking on Sunday about the possibility of further strikes on Iran, the US President said, "it depends on whether or not they sign a very strong agreement". He said that it is "highly unlikely" that strikes will be necessary. But he added that if strikes resume, the US has identified potential infrastructure targets, including 38 bridges "that we can knock down in literally one hour". ​Trump had hinted at renewing major attacks on Iran ​after ⁠last week's US midterm elections, but there has been no sign of a large-scale US military operation.

Iran has said it would respond by striking US and Israeli targets. Read more: UFC boss to meet with Trump over press secretary job offer Read more: Trump deserved thrashing in US mid-term election, says Kemi Badenoch Iranian media suggested that explosions in southern Iran on Saturday were related to Iranian military activities rather than US strikes. Iran's state television said officials had not confirmed any missile strikes on Iranian territory following blasts heard in several areas, including on Qeshm Island in the strait.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

LBC reports that Iranian media linked blasts, including on Qeshm Island, to Iranian military activity rather than US strikes. It also says there has been no sign of a large-scale US operation. It leaves out that Washington said on 2 November that it had struck the island, calling this a limited defensive measure. Without it a reader may take it that the US has not struck Iranian territory in recent days, and has less basis for understanding why US strikes were suspected.

How we know

Both the US and Iran have continued strikes on vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, however, restricting exports of energy and other commodities vital to the world economy. Iran's state television said the evening explosions might be related to Iranian military activity in the waterway, where Iran said two vessels had hit mines and a third had caught fire. The US said its air force had disabled a vessel in the Gulf of Oman beyond the strait.

Since the US and Israel began attacks on Iran in February, Tehran has sought the upper hand by hitting vessels in the Strait of Hormuz to block Gulf energy exports, while US forces began blockading movements to and from Iranian ports in April.

Read the original article on lbc.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

LBC reports Trump saying fresh strikes on Iran are 'highly unlikely' if talks progress, and that the US has identified targets including 38 bridges if strikes resume. It attributes the competing accounts of the explosions and the vessel attacks to Iranian state television and the US, and names the US and Israel as the side that began the attacks in February. The one gap is minor: LBC leaves out the US statement that it struck Qeshm Island on 2 November, which gives context for why the blasts there were linked to possible US strikes.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    LBC reports that Iranian media linked blasts, including on Qeshm Island, to Iranian military activity rather than US strikes. It also says there has been no sign of a large-scale US operation. It leaves out that Washington said on 2 November that it had struck the island, calling this a limited defensive measure. Without it a reader may take it that the US has not struck Iranian territory in recent days, and has less basis for understanding why US strikes were suspected.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “Since the US and Israel began attacks on Iran in February”

    LBC names who started the attacks in its own voice, rather than describing a war that simply erupted.

  • “Iran's state television said the evening explosions might be related to Iranian military activity in the waterway”

    LBC attributes Iran's account of the explosions to its source and keeps the uncertainty, rather than stating a cause as fact.

  • “The US said its air force had disabled a vessel”

    The US military claim is attributed to the US, given the same treatment as Iran's claims in the same passage.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from LBC

  1. 7 NovUS offers $20m reward for information about Iran's nuclear programme3.0
  2. 3 NovUS launches fresh strikes on Iran hours before Americans to vote in midterms as Trump gives closing campaign speech3.0
  3. 28 OctFamily of UK couple jailed in Iran demand stronger action after Miliband meeting0.0
  4. 27 OctIranian spy ‘ordered men to drive petrol-filled vans to RAF base used by US bombers’, court hears6.0

Everything we scored from LBC