Daily Mail, on UK Politics, 29 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Labour desperately backpedals on - amid outcry at failure to act in Budget

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Labour was left today after John Healey appeared to promise the benefits bill will be cut before the next election today. The Government's position on welfare descended into confusion as aides denied a commitment had been made - despite the Chancellor giving a seemingly clear response in an interview. The row erupted amid a furious backlash over the absence of any action in the Budget yesterday, with Kemi Badenoch accusing Labour of being 'addicted' to welfare.

Detailed forecasts revealed that welfare spending will be £6billion higher in 2030-31 than anticipated just in March. Benefits uprating and more universal credit claims accounted for most of the change. Health and disability benefits will exceed £100billion a year by the 2028-29 financial year, up from £85.6billion in 2025-26. It was previously forecast to top £100billion a year in 2029-30. But in his speech Mr Healey merely said the overall bill would be curbed in a 'Labour way', pointing to ongoing reviews by Alan Milburn into the youth unemployment crisis and PIP by disability minister Stephen Timms.

Asked directly if there 'will be cuts in welfare before the election', John Healey (pictured with Andy Burnham yesterday) replied: 'There will be, there will be a reduction in the benefits bill' Office for Budget Responsibility forecasts yesterday revealed the pressure on welfare spending in the coming years The Treasury's independent watchdog broke down the factors in the increase In a round of interviews after his Budget, Mr Healey was pressed repeatedly on what he would do about the issue and dismissed 'crude cuts'. 'I've said clearly, the Prime Minister said as well, we have to bring the benefits bill down,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. 'You don't do that by crude cuts, especially when people are feeling the cost of living pressures.'

He insisted the Government had already been reducing the 'rate of increase in the welfare bill compared to the previous period'. That included bringing back face to face assessments for claimants, he said. Pushed again what the Government would do, Mr Healey said: 'This system is unsustainable. I've been clear about that. 'The Prime Minister's been clear about it. The question is what you do about it.' Asked directly if there 'will be cuts in welfare before the election', the Chancellor replied: 'There will be, there will be a reduction in the benefits bill. 'We'll do that in a Labour way and we will do that because it is simply not good for Britain or progressive to have a bigger and bigger benefits bill... 'I feel a moral duty to deal with these youngsters who at the moment have been written off by previous governments.'

Aides told the BBC that Mr Healey had not been making any commitment on when there would be cuts. Sources accused the broadcaster of 'editorialising' by highlighting the exchange, even though the Chancellor's response appeared clear. A video has emerged of Mr Healey downing a pint after delivering his Budget yesterday

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Daily Mail reports a row over whether Chancellor John Healey committed to cutting the benefits bill before the next election, quoting his words and his aides' denial. Its headline turns what the body calls an apparent promise into a firm vow. It also describes Labour's response as desperate in its own voice. Both are minor problems in an otherwise checkable report.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Chancellor's vow to bring down benefits bill before election”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls Healey's answer a "vow" to bring down the benefits bill before the election. It states this as settled fact.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that the Chancellor made a clear, firm pledge on timing that Labour is now retreating from.
    The context
    The body hedges. It says Healey "appeared to promise" and gave a "seemingly clear response", and it reports that aides said he made no commitment on when cuts would come. The headline drops that hedge.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“appeared to promise the benefits bill will be cut”
    • Elsewhere in the article“had not been making any commitment on when there would be cuts”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “desperately backpedalling”

    Why this matters
    The Mail says in its own voice that Labour was "desperately backpedalling". It does not attribute the description to anyone.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that Labour is in a panicked retreat.
    The context
    The facts the article gives are that aides told the BBC Healey had made no commitment on timing. That is a clarification, and the word "desperately" adds a verdict those facts do not show.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Aides told the BBC that Mr Healey”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Asked directly if there 'will be cuts in welfare before the election', the Chancellor replied: 'There will be, there will be a reduction in the benefits bill.”

    It gives the question and the Chancellor's answer word for word. Readers can judge the exchange for themselves.

  • “Health and disability benefits will exceed £100billion a year by the 2028-29 financial year, up from £85.6billion in 2025-26.”

    It gives the figure with its base year and comparison. The next sentence adds the previous forecast.

  • “Aides told the BBC that Mr Healey had not been making any commitment on when there would be cuts.”

    It reports the Government's side of the dispute rather than leaving the Chancellor's words unanswered.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 29 OctALEX BRUMMER: Healey has shrunk in cowardice from the hard but necessary choices. We will all pay a price for his warped priorities0.0
  2. 29 OctBBC Radio Scotland loses 40K listeners in last year0.0
  3. 29 OctANDREW NEIL: Labour believes in deficit reduction on the never-never. The more Healey talked of prudence, the more we noticed his profligacy...0.0
  4. 29 OctWorse off under Burnham: The middle-earners and families struggling with bills who face a fall in living standards under Labour's 'is that it?' Budget3.0
  5. 29 OctMinisters urged to break cover and publicly back crackdown on Facebook owner Meta over plans to 'steal' UK publishers' content to train AI models, with publishing industry accusing Government of 'absence of any public support'6.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail